Santos Lissandra Amorim, Pérez-Escamilla Rafael, Cherol Camilla Christine de Souza, Ferreira Aline Alves, Salles-Costa Rosana
Department of Social and Applied Nutrition, Institute of Nutrition Josué de Castro, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Oct 3;3(10):e0002324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002324. eCollection 2023.
It is well known that female-headed households (FHHs) are more likely to experience food insecurity (FI) than male-headed households (MHHs), however there is a dearth of evidence on how gender intersects with other social determinants of FI. Thus, this paper investigated changes in the prevalence of household FI in Brazil from 2004 to 2018 by the intersection of gender, race/skin color and marital status of the household reference person. Data from three cross-sectional nationally representative surveys that assessed the status of FI using the Brazilian Household Food Insecurity Measurement Scale were analyzed (N2004 = 107,731; N2013 = 115,108, N2018 = 57,204). Multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between profiles of gender, race/skin color, marital status of the head of the household with household FI stratified by the presence of children <5 years of age. Over time, FHHs had a higher prevalence of mild and moderate/severe FI than did households headed by men. Food security prevalence increased from 2004 to 2013 and decreased between 2013 and 2018 for households headed by men and women. In 2018, households headed by black/brown single mothers with children < 5 years of age were at the highest FI risk. The probability of reporting moderate/severe FI in these households were 4.17 times higher (95% CI [2.96-5.90]) than for households headed by married white men. The presence of children in the household was associated with a higher probability of moderate/severe FI, especially for households headed by black/brown individuals regardless of the reference person's gender. The results suggest that gender inequities combined with darker skin color and the presence of children at home potentiate the risk of moderate/severe FI. Policy makers need to consider the principles of intersectionality when investing in codesigning, implementing, evaluating, and scaling up evidence-based programs to reduce FI.
众所周知,女性为户主的家庭(FHHs)比男性为户主的家庭(MHHs)更易经历粮食不安全(FI),然而,关于性别如何与FI的其他社会决定因素相互交织,却缺乏相关证据。因此,本文通过家庭参考人的性别、种族/肤色和婚姻状况的交叉分析,调查了2004年至2018年巴西家庭FI患病率的变化。分析了三项全国代表性横断面调查的数据,这些调查使用巴西家庭粮食不安全测量量表评估了FI状况(2004年N = 107,731;2013年N = 115,108,2018年N = 57,204)。采用多项逻辑回归模型,研究了户主的性别、种族/肤色、婚姻状况与按5岁以下儿童的存在情况分层的家庭FI之间的关系。随着时间的推移,FHHs中轻度和中度/重度FI的患病率高于男性户主家庭。2004年至2013年,男性和女性户主家庭的粮食安全患病率有所上升,而2013年至2018年有所下降。2018年,有5岁以下儿童的黑人/棕色单身母亲为户主的家庭面临的FI风险最高。这些家庭报告中度/重度FI的概率比已婚白人男性为户主的家庭高4.17倍(95%CI[2.96 - 5.90])。家庭中有儿童与中度/重度FI的较高概率相关,特别是对于由黑人/棕色个体为户主的家庭,无论参考人的性别如何。结果表明,性别不平等、较深的肤色以及家中有儿童会增加中度/重度FI的风险。政策制定者在投资共同设计、实施、评估和扩大基于证据的减少FI的项目时,需要考虑交叉性原则。