Zwickel Theresa, Klaffke Horst, Richards Keith, Rychlik Michael
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str 8-10, D-10589 Berlin, Germany; Technische Universität München, Chair of Analytical Food Chemistry, Freising, Germany.
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str 8-10, D-10589 Berlin, Germany.
J Chromatogr A. 2016 Jul 15;1455:74-85. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.04.066. Epub 2016 May 6.
An analytical method based on high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) detection for the simultaneous quantification of 12 Alternaria toxins in wine, vegetable juices and fruit juices was developed. Excellent chromatographic performance was demonstrated for tenuazonic acid (TeA) in a multi-analyte method. This comprehensive study is also the first to report the determination of TeA, alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), tentoxin (TEN) and altenuene (ALT), altertoxin I (ATX-I), altertoxin II (ATX-II), altenuisol (ATL), iso-altenuene (isoALT), altenuic acid III (AA-III) and the AAL toxins TB1 und TB2 in samples from the German market. Several types of HPLC columns were tested for the liquid chromatographic separation of the toxins of interest that widely differ in their polarities. The focus was on gaining suitable retention while avoiding derivatization steps especially for TeA and AA-III. Three atmospheric pressure ionization techniques used with liquid chromatography (electrospray, chemical and photo ionization) were tested to obtain the best selectivity and sensitivity. Samples were diluted with sodium hydrogen carbonate buffer and extracted on a diatomaceous earth solid phase extraction cartridge. Method validation was carried out by using tomato juice, citrus juice and white wine as blank matrices. Limits of detection ranged from 0.10 to 0.59μgL(-1) and limits of quantification ranged from 0.4-3.1μgL(-1) depending on the toxin and matrix. Recoveries were around 100±9% for all toxins except stemphyltoxin III (STTX-III) and altenusin (ALS) due to instability during sample clean up. Matrix-induced effects leading to ion suppression especially for ATX-I, ATX-II and AA-III were investigated. Relative standard deviations of repeatability (RSDr) and intermediate reproducibility (RSDR) were ≤9.3 and ≤17.1, respectively, for the toxins in different matrices at levels of 5 and 30μgL(-1). Finally, 103 commercially obtained wine and juice samples from the German market in 2015 were analysed. TeA was found most frequently (68% of all analysed samples) in concentrations of up to 60.0μgL(-1). AOH, AME and TEN were detected in fewer samples (37%, 16% and 30%) at lower concentrations of up to 8.2, 1.5 and 10.3μgL(-1), respectively. AA-III and ATL were detected for the first time in 3% and 17% of food all samples, in concentrations of up to 6.0μgL(-1) and 5.9μgL(-1), respectively.
建立了一种基于高效液相色谱(HPLC)和串联质谱(MS/MS)检测的分析方法,用于同时定量葡萄酒、蔬菜汁和果汁中的12种链格孢菌毒素。在多分析物方法中,细交链孢菌酮酸(TeA)表现出优异的色谱性能。这项全面的研究也是首次报道在德国市场的样品中测定TeA、交链孢酚(AOH)、交链孢酚单甲醚(AME)、细交链孢菌毒素(TEN)、互隔交链孢酚(ALT)、互隔交链孢霉毒素I(ATX-I)、互隔交链孢霉毒素II(ATX-II)、互隔交链孢酚异构体(ATL)、异互隔交链孢酚(isoALT)、互隔交链孢酸III(AA-III)以及AAL毒素TB1和TB2。测试了几种类型的HPLC柱,用于对极性差异很大的目标毒素进行液相色谱分离。重点是在避免衍生化步骤的同时获得合适的保留时间,尤其是对于TeA和AA-III。测试了三种与液相色谱联用的大气压电离技术(电喷雾、化学和光致电离),以获得最佳的选择性和灵敏度。样品用碳酸氢钠缓冲液稀释,并在硅藻土固相萃取柱上进行萃取。通过使用番茄汁、柑橘汁和白葡萄酒作为空白基质进行方法验证。检测限范围为0.10至0.59μg L⁻¹,定量限范围为0.4至3.1μg L⁻¹,具体取决于毒素和基质。除了茎点霉毒素III(STTX-III)和互隔交链孢菌素(ALS)外,所有毒素的回收率约为100±9%,这是由于在样品净化过程中它们不稳定。研究了基质诱导效应导致的离子抑制,特别是对于ATX-I、ATX-II和AA-III。对于不同基质中浓度为5和30μg L⁻¹的毒素,重复性(RSDr)和中间精密度(RSDR)的相对标准偏差分别≤9.3和≤17.1。最后,对2015年从德国市场购买的103个商业葡萄酒和果汁样品进行了分析。TeA的检出频率最高(占所有分析样品的68%),浓度高达60.0μg L⁻¹。AOH、AME和TEN在较少的样品中被检测到(分别为37%、16%和30%),浓度分别高达8.2、1.5和10.3μg L⁻¹。AA-III和ATL首次在3%和17%的食品样品中被检测到,浓度分别高达分别高达6.0μg L⁻¹和5.9μg L⁻¹。