Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜修补中小尺寸中线腹疝时桥接与补片增强的效果比较。

Outcomes of bridging versus mesh augmentation in laparoscopic repair of small and medium midline ventral hernias.

作者信息

Mitura Kryspin, Skolimowska-Rzewuska Marzena, Garnysz Karolina

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Siedlce Hospital, ul. Starowiejska 15, 08-110, Siedlce, Poland.

Panmed, Błonie 8, 08-110, Siedlce, Poland.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):382-388. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4984-9. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bridging of the hernia defect in laparoscopic repair (sIPOM) technique does not fully restore the abdominal wall function. Closure of hernia defect in IPOM-plus technique leads to the restoration of abdominal wall function and improved long-term treatment outcomes. Against the expectations, the studies confirm the formation of intraabdominal adhesions to the mesh. Regardless of the above, the search of the proper technique for mesh implantation and fixation is still ongoing. There have also been attempts to identify groups of patients who may still benefit from IPOM procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with midline abdominal wall hernias up to 10 cm wide were enrolled in the study except for subxiphoid and suprapubic hernias. Between 2011 and 2014 we performed 82 hernia repairs using the laparoscopic technique with Physiomesh. Patients were divided into sIPOM and IPOM-plus groups. The study included 44M and 38F patients aged 27-84 years. After 12-months and again in August 2015 a survey was posted to all patients with questions regarding potential recurrence.

RESULTS

After 12 months, eight patients (20 %) in sIPOM group reported subjectively perceived recurrence and none in IPOM-plus group (p = 0.002). Six patients (14.3 %) in sIPOM group reported suspected recurrence, as compared to three patients (7.1 %) in IPOM-plus group (p = 0.13). These patients were invited for a follow-up physical examination and sonography. Eventually, four cases of hernia recurrence were confirmed in sIPOM group (10 %) and none in IPOM-plus group (p = 0.018). Other patients presented with mesh bulging.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is generally safe and is associated with the low recurrence rate. Closure of fascial defects before mesh insertion offers better treatment outcomes. Non-closure of fascial defects with only bridging of the hernia defect (sIPOM) causes more frequent recurrence and bulging. As a result, patient satisfaction with treatment is lower, and they are concerned about hernia recurrence.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜修补术(sIPOM)技术中对疝缺损进行桥接并不能完全恢复腹壁功能。IPOM-plus技术中对疝缺损进行闭合可恢复腹壁功能并改善长期治疗效果。与预期相反,研究证实腹腔内会与补片形成粘连。尽管如此,寻找合适的补片植入和固定技术的工作仍在继续。也有人试图确定可能仍能从IPOM手术中获益的患者群体。

材料与方法

纳入腹壁中线疝宽度达10 cm的患者进行研究,但剑突下疝和耻骨上疝患者除外。2011年至2014年期间,我们使用Physiomesh腹腔镜技术进行了82例疝修补术。患者分为sIPOM组和IPOM-plus组。该研究纳入了44名男性和38名女性患者,年龄在27至84岁之间。在12个月后以及2015年8月再次向所有患者发放了一份关于潜在复发问题的调查问卷。

结果

12个月后,sIPOM组有8名患者(20%)主观感觉有复发,而IPOM-plus组无患者有此情况(p = 0.002)。sIPOM组有6名患者(14.3%)报告怀疑复发,而IPOM-plus组有3名患者(7.1%)报告怀疑复发(p = 0.13)。这些患者被邀请进行随访体格检查和超声检查。最终,sIPOM组确诊4例疝复发(10%),而IPOM-plus组无复发(p = 0.018)。其他患者出现补片膨出。

结论

腹腔镜腹疝修补术总体安全,复发率低。在植入补片前闭合筋膜缺损可提供更好的治疗效果。仅对疝缺损进行桥接而不闭合筋膜缺损(sIPOM)会导致更频繁的复发和膨出。因此,患者对治疗的满意度较低,且担心疝复发。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验