Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜下腹直肌前鞘修补术(LIRA)与腹腔内补片加强(IPOM plus)治疗腹壁疝的比较分析。

Laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM plus) for ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis.

机构信息

Unit of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital de Río Tinto, Huelva, Spain.

Unit of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Quirónsalud Sagrado Corazón, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):167-177. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02858-0. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Primary aim of this study is to compare the postoperative outcomes of the laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique to the intraperitoneal onlay mesh closing the defect (IPOM plus), in terms of recurrence and bulging rates at one-year follow-up; secondary aim is to compare the postoperative complications, seroma and pain at 30 days and one-year after surgery.

METHODS

Patients with midline ventral hernia of 4-10 cm in width were included. Computed tomography scan was performed before, 1 and 12 months after surgery. Pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

Forty-five and forty-seven consecutive patients underwent LIRA and IPOM plus, respectively. Preoperatively, smoke habits and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease rates were statistically significantly higher in the LIRA group (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.012, respectively). Two bulgings (4.4%) occurred in the LIRA group, while in the IPOM plus group occurred 10 bulgings (21.3%) and three recurrences (6.4%) (p = 0.017 and p = 0.085, respectively). Postoperatively, seven (15.6%, Clavien-Dindo I) and four complications (8.5%, two Clavien-Dindo I, two Clavien-Dindo III-b) occurred in the LIRA and in the IPOM plus group, respectively (p = 0.298). One month after surgery, clinical seroma, occurred in five (11.1%) and eight patients (17%) in the LIRA and in the IPOM plus group, respectively (p = 0.416). During follow-up, pain reduction occurred, without statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, even if we analysed a small series, LIRA showed lower bulging and recurrence rates in comparison to IPOM plus at one-year follow-up. Further prospective studies, with a large sample of patients and longer follow-up are required to draw definitive conclusions.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是比较腹腔镜腹直肌前鞘修补术(LIRA)与腹腔内网片修补术(IPOM plus)治疗中线腹壁疝的术后结果,比较 1 年随访时的复发率和膨出率;次要目的是比较术后 30 天和 1 年的并发症、血清肿和疼痛。

方法

纳入宽度为 4-10cm 的中线腹壁疝患者。术前、术后 1 个月和 12 个月行 CT 扫描。疼痛采用视觉模拟评分法进行评估。

结果

45 例和 47 例连续患者分别接受 LIRA 和 IPOM plus 治疗。LIRA 组术前吸烟和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的发生率明显高于 IPOM plus 组(p=0.0001 和 p=0.012)。LIRA 组发生 2 例膨出(4.4%),IPOM plus 组发生 10 例膨出(21.3%)和 3 例复发(6.4%)(p=0.017 和 p=0.085)。术后,LIRA 组和 IPOM plus 组分别发生 7 例(15.6%,Clavien-Dindo I 级)和 4 例并发症(8.5%,2 例 Clavien-Dindo I 级,2 例 Clavien-Dindo III-b 级)(p=0.298)。术后 1 个月,LIRA 组和 IPOM plus 组分别有 5 例(11.1%)和 8 例(17%)出现临床血清肿(p=0.416)。随访期间,疼痛减轻,但无统计学差异。

结论

本研究虽然分析了一个小系列,但与 IPOM plus 相比,LIRA 在 1 年随访时显示出较低的膨出率和复发率。需要进一步进行前瞻性研究,纳入更多患者和更长的随访时间,以得出明确的结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验