• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜下腹直肌前鞘修补术(LIRA)与腹腔内补片加强(IPOM plus)治疗腹壁疝的比较分析。

Laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM plus) for ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis.

机构信息

Unit of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital de Río Tinto, Huelva, Spain.

Unit of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Quirónsalud Sagrado Corazón, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):167-177. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02858-0. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-023-02858-0
PMID:37592164
Abstract

PURPOSE

Primary aim of this study is to compare the postoperative outcomes of the laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique to the intraperitoneal onlay mesh closing the defect (IPOM plus), in terms of recurrence and bulging rates at one-year follow-up; secondary aim is to compare the postoperative complications, seroma and pain at 30 days and one-year after surgery.

METHODS

Patients with midline ventral hernia of 4-10 cm in width were included. Computed tomography scan was performed before, 1 and 12 months after surgery. Pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

Forty-five and forty-seven consecutive patients underwent LIRA and IPOM plus, respectively. Preoperatively, smoke habits and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease rates were statistically significantly higher in the LIRA group (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.012, respectively). Two bulgings (4.4%) occurred in the LIRA group, while in the IPOM plus group occurred 10 bulgings (21.3%) and three recurrences (6.4%) (p = 0.017 and p = 0.085, respectively). Postoperatively, seven (15.6%, Clavien-Dindo I) and four complications (8.5%, two Clavien-Dindo I, two Clavien-Dindo III-b) occurred in the LIRA and in the IPOM plus group, respectively (p = 0.298). One month after surgery, clinical seroma, occurred in five (11.1%) and eight patients (17%) in the LIRA and in the IPOM plus group, respectively (p = 0.416). During follow-up, pain reduction occurred, without statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, even if we analysed a small series, LIRA showed lower bulging and recurrence rates in comparison to IPOM plus at one-year follow-up. Further prospective studies, with a large sample of patients and longer follow-up are required to draw definitive conclusions.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是比较腹腔镜腹直肌前鞘修补术(LIRA)与腹腔内网片修补术(IPOM plus)治疗中线腹壁疝的术后结果,比较 1 年随访时的复发率和膨出率;次要目的是比较术后 30 天和 1 年的并发症、血清肿和疼痛。

方法

纳入宽度为 4-10cm 的中线腹壁疝患者。术前、术后 1 个月和 12 个月行 CT 扫描。疼痛采用视觉模拟评分法进行评估。

结果

45 例和 47 例连续患者分别接受 LIRA 和 IPOM plus 治疗。LIRA 组术前吸烟和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的发生率明显高于 IPOM plus 组(p=0.0001 和 p=0.012)。LIRA 组发生 2 例膨出(4.4%),IPOM plus 组发生 10 例膨出(21.3%)和 3 例复发(6.4%)(p=0.017 和 p=0.085)。术后,LIRA 组和 IPOM plus 组分别发生 7 例(15.6%,Clavien-Dindo I 级)和 4 例并发症(8.5%,2 例 Clavien-Dindo I 级,2 例 Clavien-Dindo III-b 级)(p=0.298)。术后 1 个月,LIRA 组和 IPOM plus 组分别有 5 例(11.1%)和 8 例(17%)出现临床血清肿(p=0.416)。随访期间,疼痛减轻,但无统计学差异。

结论

本研究虽然分析了一个小系列,但与 IPOM plus 相比,LIRA 在 1 年随访时显示出较低的膨出率和复发率。需要进一步进行前瞻性研究,纳入更多患者和更长的随访时间,以得出明确的结论。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM plus) for ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis.腹腔镜下腹直肌前鞘修补术(LIRA)与腹腔内补片加强(IPOM plus)治疗腹壁疝的比较分析。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):167-177. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02858-0. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
2
Primary closure of the midline abdominal wall defect during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: analysis of risk factors for failure and outcomes at 5 years follow-up.腹腔镜腹疝修补术中中线腹壁缺损的一期缝合:5 年随访失败的风险因素分析及结果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9064-9071. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09374-9. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
3
Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with fascial repair (IPOM-plus) for ventral and incisional hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)联合筋膜修复术(IPOM-plus)治疗腹疝和切口疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):385-400. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02983-4. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
4
Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging.使用带腹膜桥接的腹腔内置片修补术进行腹腔镜腹侧和切口疝修补术
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):635-646. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02502-9. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
5
Is fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh superior to standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh for laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia?对于腹腔镜修补大型切口疝,采用腹腔内置入补片并封闭筋膜缺损的方法是否优于标准的腹腔内置入补片法?
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Nov;11(4):378-384. doi: 10.1111/ases.12471. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
6
Laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA technique): a step forward in minimally invasive abdominal wall reconstruction for ventral hernia repair (LVHR).腹腔镜下腹直肌前鞘重建术(LIRA 技术):微创腹壁重建治疗腹疝修补术(LVHR)的新进展。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3502-3508. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6070-y. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
7
Comparison of outcomes of the extended-view totally extraperitoneal rives-stoppa (eTEP-RS) and the intraperitoneal onlay mesh with defect closure (IPOM-plus) for W1-W2 midline incisional hernia repair-a single-center experience.扩大视野完全腹膜外Rives-Stoppa术(eTEP-RS)与腹腔内置片修补术(IPOM-plus)治疗W1-W2型中线切口疝的疗效比较——单中心经验
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3260-3271. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09922-x. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
8
Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up.术后并发症作为腹腔镜腹疝修补术后复发的独立危险因素:一项对417例患者进行长期随访的前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1469-1477. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
9
Closure versus non-closure of fascial defects in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs: a review of the literature.腹腔镜下腹壁和切口疝修补术中筋膜缺损的闭合与非闭合:文献综述
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):764-73. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1219-y. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
10
Expanding indication of laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) to suprapubic area: LIRA & TAPE.腹腔镜腹直肌前鞘折叠术(LIRA)在耻骨上方区域的适应证扩大:LIRA&TAPE。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Oct;100(10):641-643. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.08.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparosocpic "Intraperitoneal Underlay Mesh"-Plus: A Viable Approach for Incisional-Ventral Hernia Repair.腹腔镜“腹腔内补片下层修补术”加:一种可行的切口疝修补方法。
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jun 18;4:14459. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14459. eCollection 2025.
2
Robotic-assisted surgical treatment of complex giant incisional hernias: A report of 3 cases.机器人辅助手术治疗复杂巨大切口疝:3例报告
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Oct 28;49(10):1700-1705. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.240293.
3
Short‑term outcomes of minimally invasive endoscopic onlay repair for diastasis recti and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic Intracorporeal Rectus Aponeuroplasty: Early Experience of a New Surgical Technique for Ventral Hernia Repair.机器人腹腔内直肌筋膜切开术:一种新的腹疝修补术的早期经验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Oct;32(10):1092-1096. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0303. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
2
Primary closure of the midline abdominal wall defect during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: analysis of risk factors for failure and outcomes at 5 years follow-up.腹腔镜腹疝修补术中中线腹壁缺损的一期缝合:5 年随访失败的风险因素分析及结果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9064-9071. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09374-9. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
3
微创内镜下腹直肌分离及腹疝修补术的短期疗效:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1490-1500. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11555-1. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
4
The Evolving Applications of Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Rectus Aponeuroplasty (LIRA) in Ventral Hernia Repair-A Systematic Review.腹腔镜体内腹直肌筋膜成形术(LIRA)在腹疝修补术中的应用进展——一项系统评价
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Oct 23;3:13497. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13497. eCollection 2024.
5
Short-Term Outcomes of Transabdominal Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair With Rectus Aponeuroplasty (TAPPRA) for the Management of Incisional Hernias.经腹腹膜前腹直肌前鞘修补术(TAPPRA)治疗切口疝的短期疗效
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Sep 11;3:13195. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13195. eCollection 2024.
6
Robotic-assisted endoscopic onlay repair (R-ENDOR) for concomitant ventral hernias and diastasis recti: initial results and surgical technique.机器人辅助内镜上修补术(R-ENDOR)治疗合并腹疝和腹直肌分离:初步结果和手术技术。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5413-5421. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11100-6. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
7
Laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair (LaHRR): a case-series of 17 patients treated with a novel technique for laparoscopic ventral hernia and diastasis repair.腹腔镜肌后疝修补术(LaHRR):采用一种新的腹腔镜腹疝和分离修补技术治疗的 17 例患者的病例系列。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4745-4752. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11012-5. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
8
[Incisional hernias: minimally invasive surgical procedures].[切口疝:微创手术方法]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Jan;95(1):20-26. doi: 10.1007/s00104-023-02000-x. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: does IPOM plus allow to increase the indications in larger defects?
腹腔镜下腹膜前疝修补术:IPOM 附加技术是否能扩大较大缺损的适应证?
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):525-532. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02506-5. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
4
Endoscopic retromuscular technique (eTEP) vs conventional laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair with defect closure (IPOM +) for midline hernias. A case-control study.内镜经肌入路技术(eTEP)与传统腹腔镜经腹或经腹正中切口疝修补术(IPOM+)治疗中线疝的对比:一项病例对照研究。
Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):1061-1070. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02373-0. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
5
Minimally invasive repair of ventral hernia with one third of tackers and fibrin glue: less pain and same recurrence rate.使用三分之一的缝合钉和纤维蛋白胶微创修复腹疝:更少的疼痛和相同的复发率。
Minerva Chir. 2020 Oct;75(5):292-297. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08468-0.
6
Retroprosthetic Seroma After Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Is Related to Mesh Used?腹腔镜腹疝修补术后假体后血清肿与所用补片有关吗?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Mar;30(3):241-245. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0646. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
7
Minimally invasive component separation technique for large ventral hernia: which is the best choice? A systematic literature review.微创型腹部分离技术治疗大型腹疝:哪种是最佳选择?系统文献回顾。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):14-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07156-4. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
8
Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach?原发性非复杂性中线腹前壁疝:腹腔镜 IPOM 仍是合理的方法吗?
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):915-925. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02031-6. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
9
Primary Fascial Closure During Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Improves Patient Quality of Life: A Multicenter, Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜腹外疝修补术中一期筋膜关闭术改善患者生活质量:一项多中心、盲法随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2020 Mar;271(3):434-439. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003505.
10
Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.腹腔镜治疗腹前壁和切口疝指南更新(国际腹内疝学会(IEHS))-A 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3069-3139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7. Epub 2019 Jun 27.