Suppr超能文献

系统评价:用于综合初级保健环境的行为筛查措施的分类准确性

Systematic Review: Classification Accuracy of Behavioral Screening Measures for Use in Integrated Primary Care Settings.

作者信息

Lavigne John V, Meyers Kathryn Mendelsohn, Feldman Marissa

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University.

出版信息

J Pediatr Psychol. 2016 Nov;41(10):1091-1109. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsw049. Epub 2016 Jun 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the classification accuracy of measures of overall psychopathology recommended for pediatric primary care screening.  METHOD : A systematic review identified relevant instruments described in the literature. Subsequent systematic reviews identified studies of sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) of each measure for various cutoffs and different criteria for disorder (e.g., caseness determined by structured interview, exceeding a cutoff score, referral for psychiatric evaluation).  RESULTS : Measures include the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), Brief Infant-Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), and the Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional scale (ASQ:SE). For three measures (CBCL, PSC, and SDQ) studied extensively, achieving relatively high SE and SP values (≥ .70) simultaneously occurred in only 30-55% of the studies reviewed. There are relatively few studies of the ASQ:SE and BITSEA, or of relatively new measures.  DISCUSSION : Documented utility of these measures as screening instruments is limited.

摘要

目的

检验推荐用于儿科初级保健筛查的总体精神病理学测量方法的分类准确性。方法:系统评价确定了文献中描述的相关工具。随后的系统评价确定了每种测量方法在不同临界值和不同疾病标准下的敏感性(SE)和特异性(SP)研究(例如,通过结构化访谈确定的病例、超过临界分数、转介进行精神评估)。结果:测量方法包括儿童行为检查表(CBCL)、儿科症状检查表(PSC)、优势与困难问卷(SDQ)、婴幼儿简短社会情感评估(BITSEA)以及年龄与阶段问卷:社会情感量表(ASQ:SE)。对于三项经过广泛研究的测量方法(CBCL、PSC和SDQ),在仅30 - 55%的纳入研究中同时实现了相对较高的SE和SP值(≥ 0.70)。关于ASQ:SE和BITSEA或相对较新测量方法的研究相对较少。讨论:这些测量方法作为筛查工具的已记录效用有限。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验