Ferrante Jeanne M, Seaman KelliAnn, Bator Alicja, Ohman-Strickland Pamela, Gundersen Daniel, Clemow Lynn, Puhl Rebecca
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA; Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Preliminary Medicine, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Obes Sci Pract. 2016 Jun;2(2):128-135. doi: 10.1002/osp4.40. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
To evaluate how perception of weight stigma among underserved women with obesity impacts doctor-patient relationships.
This study consisted of an interviewer-administered survey of 149 women with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m) immediately after their physician visit at four Federally Qualified Health Centers. Perceptions of weight stigma and physician empathy were measured using the Stigma Situations in Health Care instrument and Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure, respectively. Associations of CARE and Stigma scores with BMI and patient characteristics were analyzed using Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test and ordinal logistic regression.
The mean CARE score was 42.1 (sd 8.4; range 11.0-50.0) and mean Stigma score was 4.6 (sd 7.6; range 0-43.0). Each increase in BMI category was associated with almost 2-fold increased odds of higher perception of Stigma (OR, 1.90, 95% CI 1.30-2.78, p=0.001). BMI was not associated with CARE. However, for each increase in stigma category, the odds of lower CARE score doubled (OR, 0.52, 95% CI 0.36-0.75, p=0.0005).
While BMI was not associated with perception of physician empathy, higher frequency of weight stigmatizing situations was negatively associated with perception of physician empathy. Reducing weight stigma in primary care could improve doctor-patient relationships and quality of care in patients with obesity.
评估肥胖的医疗服务不足女性对体重污名的认知如何影响医患关系。
本研究包括在四个联邦合格健康中心对149名肥胖女性(体重指数≥30kg/m)在就诊后立即进行的访谈式调查。分别使用医疗保健中的污名情况工具和咨询与关系同理心(CARE)量表来测量对体重污名的认知和医生的同理心。使用Mantel-Haenszel卡方检验和有序逻辑回归分析CARE和污名得分与体重指数及患者特征之间的关联。
CARE量表的平均得分为42.1(标准差8.4;范围11.0 - 50.0),污名量表的平均得分为4.6(标准差7.6;范围0 - 43.0)。体重指数类别每增加一级,对污名的更高认知几率几乎增加1倍(比值比,1.90,95%置信区间1.30 - 2.78,p = 0.001)。体重指数与CARE量表得分无关。然而,污名类别每增加一级,CARE量表得分较低的几率翻倍(比值比,0.52,95%置信区间0.36 - 0.75,p = 0.0005)。
虽然体重指数与对医生同理心的认知无关,但更高频率的体重污名化情况与对医生同理心的认知呈负相关。减少初级保健中的体重污名可能会改善肥胖患者的医患关系和护理质量。