Enewold Lindsey, Thomas Anish
Healthcare Assessment Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 13;11(6):e0156728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156728. eCollection 2016.
Despite being the basis of one of the most effective interventions in lung cancer, little is known about the patterns of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing in the general population. We assessed the frequencies and determinants of EGFR testing and erlotinib treatment among a population-based sample. A random sample (n = 1,358) of patients diagnosed in 2010 with histologically-confirmed NSCLC, as reported to the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program, had their medical records abstracted and treating physicians queried. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with EGFR testing and erlotinib treatment. Survival was examined using Cox proportional hazards regression. The frequency of EGFR testing was 16.8% overall and 22.6% for stage IV adenocarcinoma patients. Given an EGFR mutation, 33.6% of all patients and 48.3% of stage IV patients received erlotinib. Among stage IV patients, increased age, Medicaid/no/unknown insurance status, death within 2 months of diagnosis and comorbidity were inversely associated with EGFR testing; erlotinib treatment was less likely among smokers and patients with non-adenocarcinomas. EGFR-mutation was associated with improved survival, albeit only among stage IV adenocarcinomas. Less than a quarter of NSCLC patients diagnosed in 2010 received EGFR testing and less than half of the patients with EGFR-mutant stage IV tumors received erlotinib. Significant disparities were observed in EGFR mutation testing by health insurance status, comorbidity and age. A national strategy is imperative to ensure that resources and processes are in place to efficiently implement molecular testing of cancer.
尽管表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变检测是肺癌最有效干预措施之一的基础,但对于普通人群中EGFR突变检测模式却知之甚少。我们评估了基于人群样本中EGFR检测及厄洛替尼治疗的频率和决定因素。从向监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划报告的2010年经组织学确诊为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的患者中随机抽取样本(n = 1358),提取其病历并询问主治医生。采用逻辑回归来确定与EGFR检测和厄洛替尼治疗相关的因素。使用Cox比例风险回归分析生存情况。EGFR检测的总体频率为16.8%,IV期腺癌患者为22.6%。对于EGFR突变患者,所有患者中有33.6%、IV期患者中有48.3%接受了厄洛替尼治疗。在IV期患者中,年龄增加、医疗补助/无/保险状况未知、诊断后2个月内死亡以及合并症与EGFR检测呈负相关;吸烟者和非腺癌患者接受厄洛替尼治疗的可能性较小。EGFR突变与生存改善相关,尽管仅在IV期腺癌患者中如此。2010年诊断的NSCLC患者中不到四分之一接受了EGFR检测,EGFR突变的IV期肿瘤患者中不到一半接受了厄洛替尼治疗。在EGFR突变检测方面,按健康保险状况、合并症和年龄观察到显著差异。必须制定一项国家战略,以确保具备有效实施癌症分子检测的资源和流程。