• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肯塔基州非小细胞肺癌患者的 EGFR 检测和厄洛替尼使用情况。

EGFR testing and erlotinib use in non-small cell lung cancer patients in Kentucky.

机构信息

Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.

Division of Cancer Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 18;15(8):e0237790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237790. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0237790
PMID:32810185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7433873/
Abstract

This study determined the frequency and factors associated with EGFR testing rates and erlotinib treatment as well as associated survival outcomes in patients with non small cell lung cancer in Kentucky. Data from the Kentucky Cancer Registry (KCR) linked with health claims from Medicaid, Medicare and private insurance groups were evaluated. EGFR testing and erlotinib prescribing were identified using ICD-9 procedure codes and national drug codes in claims, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with EGFR testing and erlotinib prescribing. Cox-regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with survival. EGFR mutation testing rates rose from 0.1% to 10.6% over the evaluated period while erlotinib use ranged from 3.4% to 5.4%. Factors associated with no EGFR testing were older age, male gender, enrollment in Medicaid or Medicare, smoking, and geographic region. Factors associated with not receiving erlotinib included older age, male gender, enrollment in Medicare or Medicaid, and living in moderate to high poverty. Survival analysis demonstrated EGFR testing or erlotinib use was associated with a higher likelihood of survival. EGFR testing and erlotinib prescribing were slow to be implemented in our predominantly rural state. While population-level factors likely contributed, patient factors, including geographic location (areas with high poverty rates and rural regions) and insurance type, were associated with lack of use, highlighting rural disparities in the implementation of cancer precision medicine.

摘要

本研究旨在确定肯塔基州非小细胞肺癌患者中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)检测率和厄洛替尼治疗率以及相关生存结果的频率和相关因素。肯塔基州癌症登记处(KCR)的数据与医疗补助、医疗保险和私人保险团体的健康索赔相关联,并进行评估。EGFR 检测和厄洛替尼处方是通过索赔中的 ICD-9 程序代码和国家药物代码确定的。采用逻辑回归分析确定与 EGFR 检测和厄洛替尼处方相关的因素。采用 Cox 回归分析确定与生存相关的因素。在评估期间,EGFR 突变检测率从 0.1%上升到 10.6%,而厄洛替尼的使用范围从 3.4%上升到 5.4%。与未进行 EGFR 检测相关的因素包括年龄较大、男性、参加医疗补助或医疗保险、吸烟和地理位置。与未接受厄洛替尼治疗相关的因素包括年龄较大、男性、参加医疗保险或医疗补助,以及居住在中高贫困地区。生存分析表明,EGFR 检测或厄洛替尼的使用与更高的生存可能性相关。在我们这个以农村为主的州,EGFR 检测和厄洛替尼的应用实施缓慢。尽管人口因素可能起到了作用,但患者因素,包括地理位置(高贫困率和农村地区)和保险类型,与未使用相关,突出了癌症精准医学实施中的农村差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba5/7433873/b5764152e7b7/pone.0237790.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba5/7433873/b5764152e7b7/pone.0237790.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba5/7433873/b5764152e7b7/pone.0237790.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
EGFR testing and erlotinib use in non-small cell lung cancer patients in Kentucky.肯塔基州非小细胞肺癌患者的 EGFR 检测和厄洛替尼使用情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 18;15(8):e0237790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237790. eCollection 2020.
2
Real-World Patterns of EGFR Testing and Treatment with Erlotinib for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.美国非小细胞肺癌的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)检测及厄洛替尼治疗的真实世界模式
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 13;11(6):e0156728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156728. eCollection 2016.
3
EGFR mutation testing and TKI treatment patterns among veterans with stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer.EGFR 基因突变检测和 TKI 治疗模式在 III 期和 IV 期非小细胞肺癌退伍军人中的应用。
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021;27:100327. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100327. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
4
Retrospective Assessment of a Serum Proteomic Test in a Phase III Study Comparing Erlotinib plus Placebo with Erlotinib plus Tivantinib (MARQUEE) in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.回顾性评估一项三期研究中的血清蛋白质组学检测,该研究比较了厄洛替尼联合安慰剂与厄洛替尼联合替沃扎尼(MARQUEE)治疗既往治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效。
Oncologist. 2019 Jun;24(6):e251-e259. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0089. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
5
Disparities and Trends in Genetic Testing and Erlotinib Treatment among Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的基因检测和厄洛替尼治疗的差异和趋势。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 May;28(5):926-934. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0917. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
6
Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with patients prescribed afatinib or erlotinib as first-line therapy for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC in the United States.在美国,对于 EGFR 突变阳性 NSCLC 患者,处方阿法替尼或厄洛替尼作为一线治疗药物的相关医疗资源利用和成本。
J Med Econ. 2020 Jan;23(1):48-53. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1645681. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
7
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutational Testing and Erlotinib Treatment Among Veterans Diagnosed With Lung Cancer in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs.美国退伍军人事务部中被诊断为肺癌的退伍军人的表皮生长因子受体突变检测与厄洛替尼治疗
Clin Lung Cancer. 2017 Jul;18(4):401-409. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.11.018. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
8
First-line treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变阳性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的一线治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 25(5):CD010383. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010383.pub2.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of an Individualized First-Line Treatment Strategy Offering Erlotinib Based on EGFR Mutation Testing in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients in Germany.在德国晚期肺腺癌患者中基于表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变检测提供厄洛替尼的个体化一线治疗策略的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Nov;33(11):1215-28. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0305-8.
10
Utilization Patterns and Trends in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Testing Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Lung Cancer.新诊断的转移性肺癌患者中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变检测的应用模式与趋势
Clin Lung Cancer. 2017 Jul;18(4):e233-e241. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Equity and Opportunities in Lung Cancer Care-Addressing Disparities, Challenges, and Pathways Forward.肺癌护理中的公平性与机会——应对差异、挑战及未来路径
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;17(8):1347. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081347.
2
Racial and ethnic disparities in genomic testing among lung cancer patients: a systematic review.肺癌患者基因组检测中的种族和民族差异:系统评价。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jun 7;116(6):812-828. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae026.
3
Representativeness of Patients Enrolled in the Lung Cancer Master Protocol (Lung-MAP).

本文引用的文献

1
Biomarker Testing for Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Issues and Tough Choices.晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的生物标志物检测:现实世界中的问题与艰难抉择
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:531-542. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_237863. Epub 2019 May 17.
2
Identifying Smoking Status and Smoking Cessation Using a Data Linkage Between the Kentucky Cancer Registry and Health Claims Data.利用肯塔基州癌症登记处与健康保险理赔数据之间的数据关联来确定吸烟状况和戒烟情况。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019 May;3:1-8. doi: 10.1200/CCI.19.00011.
3
Prognostic value of and in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
肺癌主方案(Lung-MAP)入组患者的代表性。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2023 Sep;7:e2300218. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00218.
4
Understanding inequities in precision oncology diagnostics.理解精准肿瘤诊断中的不公平现象。
Nat Cancer. 2023 Jun;4(6):787-794. doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00568-1. Epub 2023 May 29.
5
Disparities in Lung Cancer: A Targeted Literature Review Examining Lung Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival Outcomes in the United States.肺癌的差异:一项针对美国肺癌筛查、诊断、治疗和生存结果的目标文献综述。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Jun;11(3):1489-1500. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01625-2. Epub 2023 May 19.
6
Analyzing Precision Medicine Utilization with Real-World Data: A Scoping Review.利用真实世界数据分析精准医学的应用:一项范围综述
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):557. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040557.
7
Molecular Tumor Board Review and Improved Overall Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.分子肿瘤委员会审查与非小细胞肺癌患者总体生存改善。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Sep 29;5. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00210. eCollection 2021.
8
Testing for Mutations and Rearrangements in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Considerations for Countries in Emerging Markets.晚期非小细胞肺癌的突变和重排检测:新兴市场国家的考量因素
Onco Targets Ther. 2021 Sep 1;14:4671-4692. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S313669. eCollection 2021.
[具体指标]在切除的非小细胞肺癌中的预后价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。 (注:原文中“and”前后应该有具体指标未给出)
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Sep 10;10:3393-3404. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S167578. eCollection 2018.
4
Underutilization and disparities in access to EGFR testing among Medicare patients with lung cancer from 2010 - 2013.2010 年至 2013 年间,医疗保险肺癌患者的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)检测利用不足以及获得检测的机会存在差异。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 20;18(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4190-3.
5
A phase I study of intravenous artesunate in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies.一项评价静脉注射青蒿琥酯治疗晚期实体瘤恶性肿瘤患者的 I 期临床研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;81(3):587-596. doi: 10.1007/s00280-018-3533-8. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
The Challenging Quest to Improve Rural Health Care.改善农村医疗保健的艰巨探索。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 1;378(5):473-479. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr1707176.
7
Invasive Cancer Incidence, 2004-2013, and Deaths, 2006-2015, in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Counties - United States.2004 - 2013年美国非都市和都市县的侵袭性癌症发病率以及2006 - 2015年的死亡情况
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Jul 7;66(14):1-13. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6614a1.
8
Genomic Profiling of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Community Settings: Gaps and Opportunities.社区环境下晚期非小细胞肺癌的基因组分析:差距与机遇。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2017 Nov;18(6):651-659. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
9
Medical Oncologists' Experiences in Using Genomic Testing for Lung and Colorectal Cancer Care.肿瘤内科医生在肺癌和结直肠癌治疗中使用基因检测的经验。
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Mar;13(3):e185-e196. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.016659. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
10
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.