Endocr Pract. 2016 Oct;22(10):1151-1160. doi: 10.4158/EP151144.OR. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
The aim of this study was to compare the ability of American Diabetes Association (ADA) diagnostic criteria to identify U.S. Hispanics/Latinos from diverse heritage groups with probable diabetes mellitus and assess cardiovascular risk factor correlates of those criteria.
Cross-sectional analysis of data from 15,507 adults from 6 Hispanic/Latino heritage groups, enrolled in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. The prevalence of probable diabetes mellitus was estimated using individual or combinations of ADA-defined cut points. The sensitivity and specificity of these criteria at identifying diabetes mellitus from ADA-defined prediabetes and normoglycemia were evaluated. Prevalence ratios of hypertension, abnormal lipids, and elevated urinary albumin-creatinine ratio for unrecognized diabetes mellitus-versus prediabetes and normoglycemia-were calculated.
Among Hispanics/Latinos (mean age, 43 years) with diabetes mellitus, 39.4% met laboratory test criteria for probable diabetes, and the prevalence varied by heritage group. Using the oral glucose tolerance test as the gold standard, the sensitivity of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c-alone or in combination-was low (18, 23, and 33%, respectively) at identifying probable diabetes mellitus. Individuals who met any criterion for probable diabetes mellitus had significantly higher (P<.05) prevalence of most cardiovascular risk factors than those with normoglycemia or prediabetes, and this association was not modified by Hispanic/Latino heritage group.
FPG and hemoglobin A1c are not sensitive (but are highly specific) at detecting probable diabetes mellitus among Hispanics/Latinos, independent of heritage group. Assessing cardiovascular risk factors at diagnosis might prompt multitarget interventions and reduce health complications in this young population.
2hPG = 2-hour post-glucose load plasma glucose ADA = American Diabetes Association BMI = body mass index CV = cardiovascular FPG = fasting plasma glucose HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c HCHS/SOL = Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos HDL-C = high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol NGT = normal glucose tolerance NHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test TG = triglyceride UACR = urine albumin-creatinine ratio.
本研究旨在比较美国糖尿病协会(ADA)诊断标准在美国不同祖籍的西班牙裔/拉丁裔人群中识别可能患有糖尿病的能力,并评估这些标准的心血管风险因素相关性。
对来自 6 个西班牙裔/拉丁裔祖籍群体的 15507 名成年人的 Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos 数据进行横断面分析。使用 ADA 定义的切点的组合来估计可能的糖尿病患病率。评估这些标准在识别 ADA 定义的糖尿病前期和正常血糖范围内的糖尿病的敏感性和特异性。计算未识别的糖尿病与糖尿病前期和正常血糖相比,高血压、异常脂质和尿白蛋白肌酐比升高的患病率比。
在患有糖尿病的西班牙裔/拉丁裔人群(平均年龄 43 岁)中,有 39.4%符合实验室检测标准的可能糖尿病,且患病率因祖籍群体而异。使用口服葡萄糖耐量试验作为金标准,空腹血糖(FPG)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)单独或联合的敏感性较低(分别为 18%、23%和 33%),用于识别可能的糖尿病。符合任何可能糖尿病标准的个体比血糖正常或糖尿病前期的个体具有更高的(P<.05)大多数心血管风险因素的患病率,且这种关联不受西班牙裔/拉丁裔祖籍群体的影响。
FPG 和 HbA1c 在识别西班牙裔/拉丁裔人群中的可能糖尿病方面不敏感(但高度特异),与祖籍群体无关。在诊断时评估心血管风险因素可能会促使针对多目标的干预措施,并减少该年轻人群的健康并发症。