• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算新西兰大容量奶罐中的细菌病原体水平。

Estimating Bacterial Pathogen Levels in New Zealand Bulk Tank Milk.

作者信息

Marshall J C, Soboleva T K, Jamieson P, French N P

机构信息

Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand.

Ministry for Primary Industries, Pastoral House, The Terrace, Wellington 6011, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 2016 May;79(5):771-80. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-230.

DOI:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-230
PMID:27296424
Abstract

Zoonotic bacteria such as Campylobacter, Listeria, and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli have been found in bulk tank milk in many countries, and the consumption of raw milk has been implicated in outbreaks of disease in New Zealand. Fecal contamination at milking is probably the most common source of pathogenic bacteria in bulk tank milk. Raw milk was collected from 80 New Zealand dairy farms during 2011 and 2012 and tested periodically for Campylobacter, E. coli O157, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella. Milk quality data such as coliform counts, total bacterial counts, and somatic cell counts also were collected. By treating the total bacterial count as a proxy for fecal contamination of milk and utilizing farm and animal level prevalence and shedding rates of each pathogen, a predictive model for the level of pathogenic bacteria in bulk tank raw milk was developed. The model utilizes a mixture distribution to combine the low level of contamination inherent in the milking process with isolated contamination events associated with significantly higher pathogen levels. By simulating the sampling and testing process, the predictive model was validated against the observed prevalence of each pathogen in the survey. The predicted prevalence was similar to the observed prevalence for E. coli O157 and Salmonella, although the predicted prevalence was higher than that observed in samples tested for Campylobacter.

摘要

在许多国家的大罐牛奶中都发现了人畜共患细菌,如弯曲杆菌、李斯特菌和产志贺毒素大肠杆菌,在新西兰,生牛奶的消费与疾病暴发有关。挤奶时的粪便污染可能是大罐牛奶中病原菌最常见的来源。2011年至2012年期间,从80个新西兰奶牛场采集了生牛奶,并定期检测弯曲杆菌、大肠杆菌O157、单核细胞增生李斯特菌和沙门氏菌。还收集了诸如大肠菌群计数、总细菌计数和体细胞计数等牛奶质量数据。通过将总细菌计数作为牛奶粪便污染的指标,并利用每个病原体在农场和动物层面的流行率及排出率,建立了一个大罐原料奶中病原菌水平的预测模型。该模型利用混合分布将挤奶过程中固有的低水平污染与与显著更高病原体水平相关的孤立污染事件结合起来。通过模拟采样和检测过程,根据调查中观察到的每种病原体的流行率对预测模型进行了验证。大肠杆菌O157和沙门氏菌的预测流行率与观察到的流行率相似,尽管弯曲杆菌检测样本的预测流行率高于观察到的流行率。

相似文献

1
Estimating Bacterial Pathogen Levels in New Zealand Bulk Tank Milk.估算新西兰大容量奶罐中的细菌病原体水平。
J Food Prot. 2016 May;79(5):771-80. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-230.
2
Longitudinal Study of Shiga Toxin-Producing and on Finnish Dairy Farms and in Raw Milk.长时程研究显示产志贺毒素大肠杆菌存在于芬兰的奶牛场及生牛乳中。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Mar 22;85(7). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02910-18. Print 2019 Apr 1.
3
Detection of sorbitol-negative and sorbitol-positive Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter jejuni, and Salmonella spp. in dairy farm environmental samples.检测奶牛场环境样本中不产山梨醇和产山梨醇的产志贺毒素大肠杆菌、单核细胞增生李斯特菌、空肠弯曲菌和沙门氏菌。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2004 Summer;1(2):97-104. doi: 10.1089/153531404323143611.
4
Microbiology of raw milk in New Zealand.新西兰生牛乳的微生物学。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 Jul 2;157(2):305-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.03.031. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
5
Prevalence and molecular characterization of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in bulk tank milk and fecal samples from cull cows: a 12-month survey of dairy farms in east Tennessee.淘汰奶牛的散装罐奶和粪便样本中大肠杆菌O157:H7的流行情况及分子特征:对田纳西州东部奶牛场进行的为期12个月的调查
J Food Prot. 2002 May;65(5):752-9. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-65.5.752.
6
Prevalence of foodborne pathogens in bulk tank milk.大容量罐牛奶中食源性病原体的流行情况。
J Dairy Sci. 2001 Oct;84(10):2157-62. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74661-9.
7
Sale of raw milk in northern Italy: food safety implications and comparison of different analytical methodologies for detection of foodborne pathogens.意大利北部的生奶销售:食品安全影响及食源性病原体检测不同分析方法的比较。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2012 Apr;9(4):293-7. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2011.1052. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
8
Prevalence, molecular characterization, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 on dairy cattle farms in Jordan.约旦奶牛场中单核细胞增生李斯特菌、肠炎沙门氏菌和大肠杆菌 O157:H7 的流行情况、分子特征和抗微生物耐药性特征。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Oct;102(10):8710-8720. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16461. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
9
Prevalence and characterization of foodborne pathogens from Australian dairy farm environments.澳大利亚奶牛场环境中食源性病原体的流行情况及特征
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Dec;97(12):7402-12. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8735. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
10
Prevalence of Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli virulence factors in bulk tank milk and in-line filters from U.S. dairies.美国奶企储奶罐奶样和在线过滤器中沙门氏菌、单增李斯特菌和大肠杆菌毒力因子的流行情况。
J Food Prot. 2011 May;74(5):759-68. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-423.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors affecting the microbiological quality and contamination of farm bulk milk by Staphylococcus aureus in dairy farms in Asella, Ethiopia.影响埃塞俄比亚阿塞拉地区奶牛场中金黄色葡萄球菌引起的农场散装牛奶微生物质量和污染的因素。
BMC Microbiol. 2023 Mar 7;23(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02746-0.
2
Asymptomatic Carriage of by Animals and Humans and Its Impact on the Food Chain.动物和人类对[具体内容缺失]的无症状携带及其对食物链的影响。
Foods. 2022 Nov 1;11(21):3472. doi: 10.3390/foods11213472.
3
Species Occurrence and Associated Risk Factors and Antibiogram of in Milk and Milk Products in Ambo, Holeta, and Bako Towns, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia.
埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚州安博、霍莱塔和巴科镇牛奶及奶制品中的物种分布、相关风险因素及抗菌谱
Vet Med Int. 2022 Apr 14;2022:5643478. doi: 10.1155/2022/5643478. eCollection 2022.
4
Monitoring and Characteristics of Major Mastitis Pathogens from Bulk Tank Milk in Korea.韩国原料奶中主要乳腺炎病原体的监测与特征
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 2;10(9):1562. doi: 10.3390/ani10091562.