Récapet Charlotte, Zahariev Alexandre, Blanc Stéphane, Arrivé Mathilde, Criscuolo François, Bize Pierre, Doligez Blandine
Université de Lyon, F-69000, Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France.
Département d'Ecologie et d'Evolution (DEE), Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Jun 14;16(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0697-x.
Dispersal is often associated with a suite of phenotypic traits that might reduce dispersal costs, but can be energetically costly themselves outside dispersal. Hence, dispersing and philopatric individuals might differ throughout their life cycle in their management of energy production. Because higher energy expenditure can lead to the production of highly reactive oxidative molecules that are deleterious to the organism if left uncontrolled, dispersing and philopatric individuals might differ in their management of oxidative balance. Here, we experimentally increased flight costs during reproduction via a wing load manipulation in female collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis) breeding in a patchy population. We measured the effects of the manipulation on plasmatic markers of oxidative balance and reproductive success in dispersing and philopatric females.
The impact of the wing load manipulation on the oxidative balance differed according to dispersal status. The concentration of reactive oxygen metabolites (ROMs), a marker of pro-oxidant status, was higher in philopatric than dispersing females in the manipulated group only. Differences between dispersing and philopatric individuals also depended on habitat quality, as measured by local breeding density. In low quality habitats, ROMs as well as nestling body mass were higher in philopatric females compared to dispersing ones. Independently of the manipulation or of habitat quality, plasma antioxidant capacity differed according to dispersal status: philopatric females showed higher antioxidant capacity than dispersing ones. Nestlings raised by philopatric females also had a higher fledging success.
Our results suggest that dispersing individuals maintain a stable oxidative balance when facing challenging environmental conditions, at the cost of lower reproductive success. Conversely, philopatric individuals increase their effort, and thus oxidative costs, in challenging conditions thereby maintaining their reproductive success. Our study sheds light on energetics and oxidative balance as possible processes underlying phenotypic differences between dispersing and philopatric individuals.
扩散通常与一系列表型特征相关联,这些特征可能会降低扩散成本,但在扩散之外自身可能会消耗大量能量。因此,扩散个体和留居个体在其整个生命周期中能量生产的管理方式可能有所不同。由于较高的能量消耗会导致产生高反应性的氧化分子,如果不加以控制,这些分子对生物体是有害的,所以扩散个体和留居个体在氧化平衡的管理上可能存在差异。在这里,我们通过操纵雌性白领姬鹟(Ficedula albicollis)的翼载荷,在一个斑块状种群中繁殖时实验性地增加了繁殖期间的飞行成本。我们测量了这种操纵对扩散和留居雌性氧化平衡的血浆标志物以及繁殖成功率的影响。
翼载荷操纵对氧化平衡的影响因扩散状态而异。仅在操纵组中,促氧化剂状态的标志物活性氧代谢物(ROMs)的浓度在留居雌性中高于扩散雌性。扩散个体和留居个体之间的差异还取决于栖息地质量,以当地繁殖密度来衡量。在低质量栖息地中,留居雌性的ROMs以及雏鸟体重均高于扩散雌性。与操纵或栖息地质量无关,血浆抗氧化能力因扩散状态而异:留居雌性的抗氧化能力高于扩散雌性。由留居雌性抚养的雏鸟也有更高的出飞成功率。
我们的结果表明,扩散个体在面对具有挑战性的环境条件时保持稳定的氧化平衡,但以较低的繁殖成功率为代价。相反,留居个体在具有挑战性的条件下增加努力,从而增加氧化成本,从而维持其繁殖成功率。我们的研究揭示了能量学和氧化平衡可能是扩散个体和留居个体之间表型差异的潜在过程。