Mallick Sharmistha
Department of Sociology, Kamala Nehru College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2016 Mar;7(1):57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2015.10.001. Epub 2016 May 24.
This paper is an attempt to understand the project of mainstreaming in India's health care system that has started with an aim to bring marginalized and alternative systems of medicine in mainstream. The project has gained much attention with the establishment of Department of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy (AYUSH) in the year 2003, which is now a ministry. It has ushered some positive results in terms of growth of AYUSH hospitals and dispensaries. However, it has also raised challenges around the theory and practice of mainstreaming. With an emphasis on Ayurvedic practice in Delhi Government Health Institutions, this article has tried to analyze some of those challenges and intricacies. Drawing on Weber's theory of bureaucratization and Giddens's theory of structuration, the paper asks what happens to an alternative medical system when it becomes part of the bureaucratic set-up. Along with the questions of structures, it also tries to combine the question of the agency of both patients and doctors considered to be the cornerstone of the Ayurvedic medical system. Although our study recognizes some of the successes of the mainstreaming project, it also underlines the challenges and problems it faces by analyzing three points of view (institutions, doctors, and patients).
本文旨在理解印度医疗保健系统中的主流化项目,该项目旨在将边缘化的替代医学体系纳入主流。2003年阿育吠陀、瑜伽与自然疗法、尤那尼、悉达和顺势疗法部(AYUSH)的设立使该项目备受关注,如今它已成为一个部。在AYUSH医院和诊疗所的发展方面,该项目取得了一些积极成果。然而,它也在主流化的理论和实践方面引发了挑战。本文以德里政府医疗机构对阿育吠陀实践的重视为例,试图分析其中的一些挑战和复杂性。借鉴韦伯的官僚化理论和吉登斯的结构化理论,本文探讨当一种替代医学体系成为官僚体制的一部分时会发生什么。除了结构问题,本文还试图将被视为阿育吠陀医疗体系基石的患者和医生的能动性问题结合起来。尽管我们的研究认可主流化项目的一些成功之处,但通过分析机构、医生和患者三个视角,也强调了该项目面临的挑战和问题。