Moscicki Anna-Barbara, Yao Tzy-Jyun, Ryder Mark I, Russell Jonathan S, Dominy Stephen S, Patel Kunjal, McKenna Matt, Van Dyke Russell B, Seage George R, Hazra Rohan
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research (CBAR), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 14;11(6):e0156459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156459. eCollection 2016.
To compare oral health parameters in perinatally HIV-infected (PHIV) and perinatally HIV-exposed but uninfected youth (PHEU).
In a cross-sectional substudy within the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study, participants were examined for number of decayed teeth (DT), Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (DMFT), oral mucosal disease, and periodontal disease (PD). Covariates for oral health parameters were examined using zero-inflated negative binomial regression and ordinal logistic regression models.
Eleven sites enrolled 209 PHIV and 126 PHEU. Higher DT scores were observed in participants who were PHIV [Adjusted Mean Ratio (aMR) = 1.7 (95% CI 1.2-2.5)], female [aMR = 1.4 (1.0-1.9)], had no source of regular dental care [aMR = 2.3 (1.5-3.4)], and had a high frequency of meals/snacks [≥5 /day vs 0-3, aMR = 1.9 (1.1-3.1)] and juice/soda [≥5 /day vs 0-3, aMR = 1.6 (1.1-2.4)]. Higher DMFT scores were observed in participants who were older [≥19, aMR = 1.9 (1.2-2.9)], had biological parent as caregiver [aMR = 1.2 (1.0-1.3)], had a high frequency of juice/soda [≥5 /day vs 0-3, aMR = 1.4 (1.1-1.7)] and a low saliva flow rate [mL/min, aMR = 0.8 per unit higher (0.6-1.0)]. Eighty percent had PD; no differences were seen by HIV status using the patient-based classifications of health, gingivitis or mild, moderate, or severe periodontitis. No associations were observed of CD4 count and viral load with oral health outcomes after adjustment.
Oral health was poor in PHIV and PHEU youth. This was dismaying since most HIV infected children in the U.S. are carefully followed at medical health care clinics. This data underscore the need for regular dental care. As PHIV youth were at higher risk for cavities, it will be important to better understand this relationship in order to develop targeted interventions.
比较围产期感染HIV(PHIV)和围产期暴露于HIV但未感染的青年(PHEU)的口腔健康参数。
在儿科HIV/艾滋病队列研究的一项横断面子研究中,对参与者的龋齿数量(DT)、龋失补牙数(DMFT)、口腔黏膜疾病和牙周疾病(PD)进行检查。使用零膨胀负二项回归和有序逻辑回归模型检查口腔健康参数的协变量。
11个研究点招募了209名PHIV参与者和126名PHEU参与者。在PHIV参与者中观察到更高的DT评分[调整后平均比率(aMR)=1.7(95%CI 1.2 - 2.5)],女性[aMR = 1.4(1.0 - 1.9)],没有定期牙科护理来源[aMR = 2.3(1.5 - 3.4)],以及进餐/吃零食频率高[≥5次/天对比0 - 3次/天,aMR = 1.9(1.1 - 3.1)]和果汁/苏打水饮用频率高[≥5次/天对比0 - 3次/天,aMR = 1.6(1.1 - 2.4)]。在年龄较大的参与者中观察到更高的DMFT评分[≥19岁,aMR = 1.9(1.2 - 2.9)],有亲生父母作为照顾者[aMR = 1.2(1.0 - 1.3)],果汁/苏打水饮用频率高[≥5次/天对比0 - 3次/天,aMR = 1.4(1.1 - 1.7)]和唾液流速低[毫升/分钟,每高一个单位aMR = 0.8(0.6 - 1.0)]。80%的人患有牙周疾病;根据基于患者的健康分类、牙龈炎或轻度、中度或重度牙周炎,未观察到HIV感染状态之间的差异。调整后未观察到CD4细胞计数和病毒载量与口腔健康结果之间的关联。
PHIV和PHEU青年的口腔健康状况较差。这令人沮丧,因为美国大多数感染HIV的儿童在医疗保健诊所都受到密切关注。这些数据强调了定期牙科护理的必要性。由于PHIV青年患龋齿的风险更高,为了制定有针对性的干预措施,更好地理解这种关系将很重要。