Suppr超能文献

比较初始序贯器官衰竭评估评分与简化急性生理学评分,以分析重症监护病房感染性疾病中的多器官功能障碍。

Initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score versus Simplified Acute Physiology score to analyze multiple organ dysfunction in infectious diseases in Intensive Care Unit.

作者信息

Nair Remyasri, Bhandary Nithish M, D'Souza Ashton D

机构信息

Department of General Medicine, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Department of Anesthesia, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;20(4):210-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.180041.

Abstract

AIMS

To investigate initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of patients in Intensive Care Unit (ICU), who were diagnosed with infectious disease, as an indicator of multiple organ dysfunction and to examine if initial SOFA score is a better mortality predictor compared to Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hospital-based study done in medical ICU, from June to September 2014 with a sample size of 48. Patients aged 18 years and above, diagnosed with infectious disease were included. Patients with history of chronic illness (renal/hepatic/pulmonary/  cardiovascular), diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, those on immunosuppressive therapy/chemoradiotherapy for malignancy and patients in immunocompromised state were excluded. Blood investigations were obtained. Six organ dysfunctions were assessed using initial SOFA score and graded from 0 to 4. SAPS was calculated as the sum of points assigned to each of the 17 variables (12 physiological, age, type of admission, and three underlying diseases). The outcome measure was survival status at ICU discharge.

RESULTS

We categorized infectious diseases into dengue fever, leptospirosis, malaria, respiratory tract infections, and others which included undiagnosed febrile illness, meningitis, urinary tract infection and gastroenteritis. Initial SOFA score was both sensitive and specific; SAPS lacked sensitivity. We found no significant association between age and survival status. Both SAPS and initial SOFA score were found to be statistically significant as mortality predictors. There is significant association of initial SOFA score in analyzing organ dysfunction in infectious diseases (P < 0.001). SAPS showed no statistical significance. There was statistically significant (P = 0.015) percentage of nonsurvivors with moderate and severe dysfunction, based on SOFA score. Nonsurvivors had higher SAPS but was not statistically significant (P = 0.094).

CONCLUSIONS

Initial SOFA score is a superior mortality predictor. It easily measures degree of organ dysfunction in infectious diseases and complements other scoring systems.

摘要

目的

研究重症监护病房(ICU)中被诊断为传染病的患者的初始序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分,作为多器官功能障碍的指标,并检验初始SOFA评分与简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)相比是否为更好的死亡率预测指标。

材料与方法

2014年6月至9月在医学ICU进行的一项基于医院的研究,样本量为48例。纳入年龄18岁及以上、被诊断为传染病的患者。排除有慢性疾病(肾/肝/肺/心血管疾病)、糖尿病、高血压、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、心脏病病史的患者,接受恶性肿瘤免疫抑制治疗/放化疗的患者以及免疫功能低下状态的患者。进行血液检查。使用初始SOFA评分评估六种器官功能障碍,并从0到4进行分级。SAPS计算为分配给17个变量(12个生理变量、年龄、入院类型和三种基础疾病)中每个变量的分数之和。结局指标为ICU出院时的生存状态。

结果

我们将传染病分为登革热、钩端螺旋体病、疟疾、呼吸道感染和其他疾病,其他疾病包括未确诊的发热性疾病、脑膜炎、尿路感染和胃肠炎。初始SOFA评分既敏感又特异;SAPS缺乏敏感性。我们发现年龄与生存状态之间无显著关联。SAPS和初始SOFA评分均被发现作为死亡率预测指标具有统计学意义。初始SOFA评分在分析传染病中的器官功能障碍方面存在显著关联(P < 0.001)。SAPS无统计学意义。基于SOFA评分,中度和重度功能障碍的非幸存者百分比具有统计学意义(P = 0.015)。非幸存者的SAPS较高,但无统计学意义(P = 0.094)。

结论

初始SOFA评分是更好的死亡率预测指标。它易于测量传染病中器官功能障碍的程度,并补充其他评分系统。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验