Suppr超能文献

现实条件下克朗巴哈α信度的最佳替代方法:同属与不对称测量

Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements.

作者信息

Trizano-Hermosilla Italo, Alvarado Jesús M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of La FronteraTemuco, Chile; Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, University Autonoma de MadridMadrid, Spain.

Department of Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences, University Complutense de Madrid Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 May 26;7:769. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

The Cronbach's alpha is the most widely used method for estimating internal consistency reliability. This procedure has proved very resistant to the passage of time, even if its limitations are well documented and although there are better options as omega coefficient or the different versions of glb, with obvious advantages especially for applied research in which the ítems differ in quality or have skewed distributions. In this paper, using Monte Carlo simulation, the performance of these reliability coefficients under a one-dimensional model is evaluated in terms of skewness and no tau-equivalence. The results show that omega coefficient is always better choice than alpha and in the presence of skew items is preferable to use omega and glb coefficients even in small samples.

摘要

克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's alpha)是评估内部一致性信度最广泛使用的方法。即便其局限性已有充分记录,且存在诸如欧米伽系数(omega coefficient)或不同版本的全局系数(glb)等更好的选择,尤其是在应用研究中,各项目质量不同或分布呈偏态时具有明显优势,但该方法已证明对时间推移具有很强的抗性。本文通过蒙特卡洛模拟,在一维模型下,从偏态和非tau等价性方面评估了这些信度系数的性能。结果表明,欧米伽系数始终是比阿尔法系数更好的选择,并且在存在偏态项目的情况下,即使样本量较小,使用欧米伽系数和全局系数也更为可取。

相似文献

4
A Simulation Study on the Performance of Different Reliability Estimation Methods.不同可靠性估计方法性能的模拟研究
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Dec;81(6):1089-1117. doi: 10.1177/0013164421994184. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
7
Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.谢谢克朗巴哈系数,接下来我们自己来。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000144. Epub 2017 May 29.
8
Bayesian Estimation of Single-Test Reliability Coefficients.贝叶斯估计单测可靠性系数。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2022 Jul-Aug;57(4):620-641. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1891855. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Quantile lower bounds to reliability based on locally optimal splits.基于局部最优分割的可靠性分位数下限。
Psychometrika. 2015 Mar;80(1):182-95. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9393-6. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
7
Invited Paper: The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models.特邀论文:双因素测量模型的重新发现
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Sep 1;47(5):667-696. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555.
8
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a meta confirmatory factor analysis.医院焦虑和抑郁量表:元验证性因子分析。
J Psychosom Res. 2013 Jan;74(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Nov 18.
9
Is coefficient alpha robust to non-normal data?α系数对非正态数据是否稳健?
Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 15;3:34. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00034. eCollection 2012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验