Schmidt Juliane, Janse Esther, Scharenborg Odette
Centre for Language Studies, Radboud UniversityNijmegen, Netherlands; International Max Planck Research School for Language SciencesNijmegen, Netherlands.
Centre for Language Studies, Radboud UniversityNijmegen, Netherlands; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourNijmegen, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2016 May 31;7:781. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00781. eCollection 2016.
This study investigated whether age and/or differences in hearing sensitivity influence the perception of the emotion dimensions arousal (calm vs. aroused) and valence (positive vs. negative attitude) in conversational speech. To that end, this study specifically focused on the relationship between participants' ratings of short affective utterances and the utterances' acoustic parameters (pitch, intensity, and articulation rate) known to be associated with the emotion dimensions arousal and valence. Stimuli consisted of short utterances taken from a corpus of conversational speech. In two rating tasks, younger and older adults either rated arousal or valence using a 5-point scale. Mean intensity was found to be the main cue participants used in the arousal task (i.e., higher mean intensity cueing higher levels of arousal) while mean F 0 was the main cue in the valence task (i.e., higher mean F 0 being interpreted as more negative). Even though there were no overall age group differences in arousal or valence ratings, compared to younger adults, older adults responded less strongly to mean intensity differences cueing arousal and responded more strongly to differences in mean F 0 cueing valence. Individual hearing sensitivity among the older adults did not modify the use of mean intensity as an arousal cue. However, individual hearing sensitivity generally affected valence ratings and modified the use of mean F 0. We conclude that age differences in the interpretation of mean F 0 as a cue for valence are likely due to age-related hearing loss, whereas age differences in rating arousal do not seem to be driven by hearing sensitivity differences between age groups (as measured by pure-tone audiometry).
本研究调查了年龄和/或听力敏感度差异是否会影响在对话语音中对情感维度唤醒(平静与激动)和效价(积极与消极态度)的感知。为此,本研究特别关注参与者对简短情感话语的评分与已知与情感维度唤醒和效价相关的话语声学参数(音高、强度和发音速率)之间的关系。刺激材料由从对话语音语料库中选取的简短话语组成。在两项评分任务中,年轻和年长的成年人使用5分制对唤醒或效价进行评分。结果发现,平均强度是参与者在唤醒任务中使用的主要线索(即平均强度越高,唤醒水平越高),而平均F0是效价任务中的主要线索(即平均F0越高,被解释为越消极)。尽管在唤醒或效价评分方面没有总体年龄组差异,但与年轻成年人相比,年长成年人对提示唤醒的平均强度差异反应较弱,而对提示效价的平均F0差异反应较强。年长成年人中的个体听力敏感度并未改变平均强度作为唤醒线索的使用。然而,个体听力敏感度通常会影响效价评分并改变平均F0的使用。我们得出结论,将平均F0解释为效价线索时的年龄差异可能是由于与年龄相关的听力损失,而在评分唤醒方面的年龄差异似乎并非由年龄组之间的听力敏感度差异(通过纯音听力测定法测量)所驱动。