Spoonamore Katherine G, Johnson Nicole M
Department of Medicine, Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, IN , USA.
Invitae Corporation , San Francisco, CA , USA.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2016 May 31;3:14. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2016.00014. eCollection 2016.
Inherited cardiovascular (CV) conditions are common, and comprehensive care of affected families often involves genetic testing. When the clinical presentations of these conditions overlap, genetic testing may clarify diagnoses, etiologies, and treatments in symptomatic individuals and facilitate the identification of asymptomatic, at-risk relatives, allowing for often life-saving preventative care. Although some professional society guidelines on inherited cardiac conditions include genetic testing recommendations, they quickly become outdated owing to the rapid expansion and use of such testing. Currently, these guidelines primarily discuss the benefits of targeted genetic testing for identifying at-risk relatives. Although most insurance policies acknowledge the benefit and the necessity of this testing, many exclude coverage for testing altogether or are vague about coverage for testing in probands, which is imperative if clinicians are to have the best chance of accurately identifying pathogenic variant(s) in a family. In response to uncertainties about coverage, many commercial CV genetic testing laboratories have shouldered the burden of working directly with commercial payers and protecting patients/institutions from out-of-pocket costs. As a result, many clinicians are unaware that payer coverage policies may not match professional recommendations for CV genetic testing. This conundrum has left patients, clinicians, payers, and laboratories at an impasse when determining the best path forward for meaningful and sustainable testing. Herein, we discuss the need for all involved parties to recognize their common goals in this process, which should motivate collaboration in changing existing frameworks and creating more sustainable access to genetic information for families with inherited CV conditions.
遗传性心血管疾病很常见,对受影响家庭的综合护理通常涉及基因检测。当这些疾病的临床表现重叠时,基因检测可以明确有症状个体的诊断、病因和治疗方法,并有助于识别无症状的高危亲属,从而实现往往能挽救生命的预防性护理。尽管一些关于遗传性心脏病的专业协会指南包括了基因检测建议,但由于此类检测的迅速扩展和应用,这些指南很快就过时了。目前,这些指南主要讨论了靶向基因检测对于识别高危亲属的益处。尽管大多数保险政策都承认这种检测的益处和必要性,但许多保险政策完全排除了检测费用的覆盖范围,或者对先证者检测的覆盖范围含糊不清,而如果临床医生想要有最大机会准确识别一个家族中的致病变异,这一点至关重要。为应对覆盖范围的不确定性,许多商业心血管基因检测实验室承担起了直接与商业付款人合作的责任,保护患者/机构免受自付费用的负担。结果,许多临床医生并未意识到付款人的覆盖政策可能与心血管基因检测的专业建议不符。在确定有意义且可持续的检测的最佳前进道路时,这一难题使患者、临床医生、付款人和实验室陷入了僵局。在此,我们讨论了所有相关方在这一过程中认识到其共同目标的必要性,这应促使各方合作,改变现有框架,并为患有遗传性心血管疾病的家庭创造更可持续的基因信息获取途径。