• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保险覆盖范围无法预测基因检测结果:探寻医保支付方对生殖系癌症检测决策的意义。

Insurance coverage does not predict outcomes of genetic testing: The search for meaning in payer decisions for germline cancer tests.

作者信息

Amendola Laura M, Hart M Ragan, Bennett Robin L, Horike-Pyne Martha, Dorschner Michael, Shirts Brian, Jarvik Gail P

机构信息

Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2019 Dec;28(6):1208-1213. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1155. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1155
PMID:31317629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6901727/
Abstract

In this work, we explore the results of germline cancer genetic tests in individuals whose insurance would not cover this testing. We enrolled 31 patients with a personal history of cancer whose health insurer denied coverage for a clinical germline cancer panel genetic test recommended by a medical genetics provider into a study providing exome sequencing and return of cancer-related results. Five participants (16%) had a pathogenic variant identified related to increased cancer risk. Three participants (10%) had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in a gene related to their cancer history. These rates are not significantly different than the 12% rate of pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants and VUS in 1,462 patients approved by insurance to have a similar clinical germline cancer test (p = .59 for P/LP variants; p = .87 for VUS; Shirts et al., Genet Med, 18:974, 2016). Health insurance guidelines may not meaningfully differentiate between patients with cancer who are likely to benefit from germline cancer genetic testing and those who will not. Failure to identify pathogenic variants in this research cohort would have led to suboptimal care. Strategic evaluation of current germline cancer genetic testing coverage policies is needed to appropriately deliver precision medicine.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们探究了保险不涵盖生殖系癌症基因检测的个体进行此类检测的结果。我们招募了31名有个人癌症病史的患者,他们的健康保险公司拒绝为医学遗传学提供者推荐的临床生殖系癌症基因检测面板提供保险,这些患者参与了一项提供外显子组测序并反馈癌症相关结果的研究。5名参与者(16%)检测出与癌症风险增加相关的致病变异。3名参与者(10%)在与其癌症病史相关的基因中检测出意义未明的变异(VUS)。这些比率与1462名经保险批准进行类似临床生殖系癌症检测的患者中12%的致病或可能致病(P/LP)变异及VUS比率相比,并无显著差异(P/LP变异的p值为0.59;VUS的p值为0.87;Shirts等人,《遗传医学》,18:974,2016年)。健康保险指南可能无法有效区分可能从生殖系癌症基因检测中获益的癌症患者和无法获益的患者。在这个研究队列中未能识别致病变异可能会导致治疗效果不佳。需要对当前生殖系癌症基因检测覆盖政策进行战略评估,以适当提供精准医疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36bc/6901727/23d3da48744c/nihms-1040447-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36bc/6901727/23d3da48744c/nihms-1040447-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36bc/6901727/23d3da48744c/nihms-1040447-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Insurance coverage does not predict outcomes of genetic testing: The search for meaning in payer decisions for germline cancer tests.保险覆盖范围无法预测基因检测结果:探寻医保支付方对生殖系癌症检测决策的意义。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Dec;28(6):1208-1213. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1155. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
2
Half of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants found on panel tests do not fulfil NHS testing criteria.在专家组检测中发现的种系致病性和可能致病性变异,有一半不符合英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的检测标准。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 21;12(1):2507. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06376-4.
3
Comparing the Diagnostic Yield of Germline Exome Versus Panel Sequencing in the Diverse Population of the Texas KidsCanSeq Pediatric Cancer Study.比较德克萨斯州儿童癌症研究中多样化人群中胚系外显子组与面板测序的诊断产量。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Sep;8:e2400187. doi: 10.1200/PO.24.00187.
4
Diagnostic Outcomes of Concurrent DNA and RNA Sequencing in Individuals Undergoing Hereditary Cancer Testing.个体接受遗传性癌症检测时同时进行 DNA 和 RNA 测序的诊断结果。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;10(2):212-219. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5586.
5
Germline Analysis from Tumor-Germline Sequencing Dyads to Identify Clinically Actionable Secondary Findings.通过肿瘤-胚系测序二元组进行胚系分析以识别具有临床可操作性的次要发现。
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Aug 15;22(16):4087-4094. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0015. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
6
Germline Mutations for Novel Candidate Predisposition Genes in Sporadic Schwannomatosis.散发性许旺细胞瘤中新型候选易感性基因的种系突变。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Nov;478(11):2442-2450. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001239.
7
Ethnic disparities among men with prostate cancer undergoing germline testing.男性前列腺癌患者进行种系检测的种族差异。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Mar;38(3):80.e1-80.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
8
Identification of a Variety of Mutations in Cancer Predisposition Genes in Patients With Suspected Lynch Syndrome.疑似林奇综合征患者癌症易感基因中多种突变的鉴定
Gastroenterology. 2015 Sep;149(3):604-13.e20. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 14.
9
Whole Exome Sequencing Identifies Novel Genetic Alterations in Patients with Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma.全外显子组测序鉴定嗜铬细胞瘤/副神经节瘤患者的新遗传改变。
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2020 Dec;35(4):909-917. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2020.756. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
10
Disparate Rates of Germline Variants in Cancer Predisposition Genes in African American/Black Compared With Non-Hispanic White Individuals Between 2015 and 2022.2015 年至 2022 年间,非西班牙裔白人与非裔美国人/黑人中癌症易感基因种系变异的差异率。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Jul;8:e2300715. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00715.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency of Genetic Testing Among Patients With Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancers: A Strategy to Improve Compliance.上皮性卵巢癌、输卵管癌和腹膜癌患者的基因检测频率:提高依从性的策略
Int J Genomics. 2025 Mar 1;2025:9281891. doi: 10.1155/ijog/9281891. eCollection 2025.
2
The Evolution of Genetic Testing from Focused Testing to Panel Testing and from Patient Focused to Population Testing: Are We There Yet?基因检测从靶向检测到基因组合检测,以及从患者导向检测到群体检测的演变:我们实现目标了吗?
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Jul 19;37(3):133-139. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770381. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Novel hemizygous single-nucleotide duplication in RPGR in a patient with retinal dystrophy and sensorineural hearing loss.患者视网膜营养不良伴感音神经性聋,发现 RPGR 中 novel hemizygous single-nucleotide duplication。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024 Feb;12(2):e2404. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2404.
4
Clinical guideline variability in the diagnosis of hereditary hematopoietic malignancy syndromes.遗传性血液恶性肿瘤综合征诊断中的临床指南变异性。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2023 Sep;64(9):1562-1565. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2023.2220457. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
5
Insurance denials and diagnostic rates in a pediatric genomic research cohort.保险拒付与儿科基因组研究队列中的诊断率。
Genet Med. 2023 May;25(5):100020. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100020. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
6
Association between Health Insurance Type and Genetic Testing and/or Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer.医疗保险类型与乳腺癌和卵巢癌基因检测及/或咨询之间的关联。
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 31;12(8):1263. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081263.
7
Genetic Testing and/or Counseling for Colorectal Cancer by Health Insurance Type.按健康保险类型划分的结直肠癌基因检测和/或咨询
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 15;12(7):1146. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071146.
8
Self-rated family health history knowledge among All of Us program participants.All of Us 计划参与者的自评家庭健康史知识。
Genet Med. 2022 Apr;24(4):955-961. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.12.006. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
9
Outcomes of retesting in patients with previously uninformative cancer genetics evaluations.先前无信息的癌症遗传学评估患者的重复检测结果。
Fam Cancer. 2022 Jul;21(3):375-385. doi: 10.1007/s10689-021-00276-8. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

1
The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations.临床测序证据生成研究联盟:在不同和医疗资源不足的人群中整合基因组测序。
Am J Hum Genet. 2018 Sep 6;103(3):319-327. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.007.
2
Genetic testing insurance coverage trends: a review of publicly available policies from the largest US payers.基因检测保险覆盖趋势:对美国最大支付方公开政策的综述
Per Med. 2013 May;10(3):235-243. doi: 10.2217/pme.13.9.
3
The ICER Value Framework: Integrating Cost Effectiveness and Affordability in the Assessment of Health Care Value.增量成本效果比值价值框架:在医疗保健价值评估中整合成本效益与可负担性
Value Health. 2018 Mar;21(3):258-265. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.017.
4
Payer coverage policies for multigene tests.多基因检测的支付方覆盖政策。
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Jul 12;35(7):614-617. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3912.
5
Barriers to Genetic Testing for Pediatric Medicaid Beneficiaries With Epilepsy.癫痫患儿医疗补助受益人的基因检测障碍
Pediatr Neurol. 2017 Aug;73:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
6
Making genomic medicine evidence-based and patient-centered: a structured review and landscape analysis of comparative effectiveness research.使基因组医学具有循证性和以患者为中心:比较有效性研究的结构化综述和全景分析。
Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1081-1091. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.21. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
7
Payer Coverage for Hereditary Cancer Panels: Barriers, Opportunities, and Implications for the Precision Medicine Initiative.医疗保险对遗传性癌症检测套餐的覆盖情况:障碍、机遇及对精准医疗计划的影响
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Feb;15(2):219-228. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0022. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
8
Payer view of personalized medicine.支付方对个性化医疗的看法。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Dec 1;73(23):2007-2012. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160038.
9
Who Pays? Coverage Challenges for Cardiovascular Genetic Testing in U.S. Patients.谁来买单?美国患者心血管基因检测的医保覆盖挑战
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2016 May 31;3:14. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2016.00014. eCollection 2016.
10
Increased yield of actionable mutations using multi-gene panels to assess hereditary cancer susceptibility in an ethnically diverse clinical cohort.使用多基因检测板评估种族多样化临床队列中的遗传性癌症易感性时可操作突变的产量增加。
Cancer Genet. 2016 Apr;209(4):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.12.013. Epub 2016 Jan 12.