Christina Venessa, Baldwin Kathryn, Biron Alain, Emed Jessica, Lepage Karine
McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
J Nurs Manag. 2016 Nov;24(8):1080-1087. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12409. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
To explore the perceptions of nurses in an acute care setting on factors influencing the effectiveness of audit and feedback.
Audit and feedback is widely used and recommended in nursing to promote evidence-based practice and to improve care quality. Yet the literature has shown a limited to modest effect at most. Audit and feedback will continue to be unreliable until we learn what influences its effectiveness.
A qualitative study was conducted using individual, semi-structured interviews with 14 registered nurses in an acute care teaching hospital in Montreal, Canada.
Three themes were identified: the relevance of audit and feedback, particularly understanding the purpose of audit and feedback and the prioritisation of audit criteria; the audit and feedback process, including its timing and feedback characteristics; and individual factors, such as personality and perceived accountability.
According to participants, they were likely to have a better response to audit and feedback when they perceived that it was relevant and that the process fitted their preferences.
This study benefits nursing leaders and managers involved in quality improvement by providing a better understanding of nurses' perceptions on how best to use audit and feedback as a strategy to promote evidence-based practice.
探讨急症护理环境中护士对影响审核与反馈有效性因素的看法。
审核与反馈在护理工作中被广泛应用并得到推荐,以促进循证实践并提高护理质量。然而,文献表明其效果至多有限至中等。在我们了解影响其有效性的因素之前,审核与反馈将继续不可靠。
在加拿大蒙特利尔一家急症护理教学医院,对14名注册护士进行个人半结构式访谈,开展了一项定性研究。
确定了三个主题:审核与反馈的相关性,特别是理解审核与反馈的目的以及审核标准的优先级;审核与反馈过程,包括其时机和反馈特征;以及个人因素,如个性和感知到的责任感。
根据参与者的说法,当他们认为审核与反馈相关且过程符合他们的偏好时,他们可能会对审核与反馈有更好的反应。
本研究有助于参与质量改进的护理领导和管理人员更好地理解护士对于如何最好地利用审核与反馈作为促进循证实践策略的看法。