Gifford Wendy, Davies Barbara, Edwards Nancy, Griffin Pat, Lybanon Vanessa
University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4(3):126-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00095.x.
Integration of research evidence into clinical nursing practice is essential for the delivery of high-quality nursing care. Leadership behaviours of nurse managers and administrators have been identified as important to support research use and evidence-based practice. Yet minimal evidence exists indicating what constitutes effective nursing leadership for this purpose, or what kinds of interventions help leaders to successfully influence research-based care.
(1) To describe leadership activities of nurse managers that influence nurses' use of research evidence; and (2) to identify interventions aimed at supporting nurse managers to influence research use in clinical nursing practice.
A search of electronic databases was conducted for studies on behaviours or activities of nurse managers/administrators and the use of research evidence by nurses. Sifting, screening, and quality assessments were done by two reviewers. Results were synthesized by study type (quantitative and qualitative) and reported.
Twelve studies met inclusion criteria (eight quantitative, four qualitative). Three activities were found in quantitative studies that influenced nurses' use of research: managerial support, policy revisions, and auditing. Qualitative studies showed organizational issues as barriers to managers' abilities to affect research use, while role modeling and valuing research facilitated research use. Four studies, one of which was experimental, included an intervention to support managers, but all had insufficient information about leadership development.
To date, important descriptive work highlights the strategic role managers have in research transfer. Both facilitative and regulatory activities appear to be necessary for managers to influence research use. These findings have important implications for evolving theoretical models describing factors that affect the process of research utilization. It is time to move the science forward and test a hypothesis linking leadership to outcomes. Qualitative methods are essential for understanding the process of leadership for research transfer.
将研究证据整合到临床护理实践中对于提供高质量护理至关重要。已确定护士经理和管理人员的领导行为对于支持研究应用和循证实践很重要。然而,几乎没有证据表明为此目的有效的护理领导包括哪些内容,或者哪些干预措施有助于领导者成功影响基于研究的护理。
(1)描述影响护士研究证据应用的护士经理的领导活动;(2)确定旨在支持护士经理在临床护理实践中影响研究应用的干预措施。
对电子数据库进行检索,以查找关于护士经理/管理人员的行为或活动以及护士研究证据应用的研究。由两名评审员进行筛选、甄别和质量评估。结果按研究类型(定量和定性)进行综合并报告。
12项研究符合纳入标准(8项定量研究,4项定性研究)。在定量研究中发现三项影响护士研究应用的活动:管理支持、政策修订和审核。定性研究表明组织问题是管理人员影响研究应用能力的障碍,而以身作则和重视研究则促进了研究应用。四项研究(其中一项为实验性研究)纳入了支持管理人员的干预措施,但所有研究关于领导力发展的信息都不足。
迄今为止,重要的描述性工作突出了管理人员在研究转化中的战略作用。促进性和监管性活动似乎都是管理人员影响研究应用所必需的。这些发现对于完善描述影响研究应用过程的因素的理论模型具有重要意义。现在是推动该科学发展并检验将领导力与结果联系起来假设的时候了。定性方法对于理解研究转化的领导过程至关重要。