• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1999 - 2009年挪威早产的社会经济风险因素

Socio-economic risk factors for preterm birth in Norway 1999-2009.

作者信息

Oftedal Anne-Marie, Busterud Kari, Irgens Lorentz M, Haug Kjell, Rasmussen Svein

机构信息

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway The Medical Birth Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2016 Aug;44(6):587-92. doi: 10.1177/1403494816653288. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1177/1403494816653288
PMID:27307464
Abstract

AIMS

Preterm birth is a major cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity and is strongly associated with socio-economic factors. The objective of this study was to examine the associations of maternal education, marital status and ethnicity with preterm birth and to determine the extent to which such associations can be explained by the established risk factors of maternal age, parity and smoking.

METHODS

This was a register-based cohort study with data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1999-2009 and Statistics Norway. The sample included all singleton spontaneous births in Norway from 1999 to 2009 (n=494,073). The main outcome measure was preterm birth (gestational age <37 weeks).

RESULTS

Low maternal education and single motherhood were associated with preterm birth. After adjustment for the established risk factors, the excess risks were reduced, but remained statistically significant. The relative risk for low education was reduced from 1.50 to 1.36 and for single motherhood from 1.50 to 1.28. Women from Asia had a higher risk of preterm birth than Norwegian-born women (relative risk 1.29) with minor effects of adjustment. CONCLUSIONS SEVERAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC RISK FACTORS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH PRETERM BIRTH IN NORWAY IN ADDITION TO THE ESTABLISHED RISK FACTORS, PRENATAL HEALTH CARE SHOULD FOCUS ON HIGH-RISK GROUPS DEFINED BY MATERNAL EDUCATION, MARITAL STATUS AND ETHNICITY.

摘要

目的

早产是围产期死亡和发病的主要原因,且与社会经济因素密切相关。本研究的目的是探讨母亲教育程度、婚姻状况和种族与早产之间的关联,并确定这些关联在多大程度上可以由母亲年龄、产次和吸烟等既定风险因素来解释。

方法

这是一项基于登记的队列研究,数据来自挪威1999 - 2009年医疗出生登记处和挪威统计局。样本包括1999年至2009年挪威所有单胎自然分娩(n = 494,073)。主要结局指标是早产(孕周<37周)。

结果

母亲教育程度低和单身母亲身份与早产有关。在对既定风险因素进行调整后,额外风险有所降低,但仍具有统计学意义。低教育程度的相对风险从1.50降至1.36,单身母亲身份的相对风险从1.50降至1.28。亚洲女性早产风险高于挪威出生的女性(相对风险1.29),调整后的影响较小。结论:除既定风险因素外,挪威还有几个社会经济风险因素与早产有关,产前保健应关注由母亲教育程度、婚姻状况和种族定义的高危人群。

相似文献

1
Socio-economic risk factors for preterm birth in Norway 1999-2009.1999 - 2009年挪威早产的社会经济风险因素
Scand J Public Health. 2016 Aug;44(6):587-92. doi: 10.1177/1403494816653288. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
2
Secular trends in socio-economic status and the implications for preterm birth.社会经济地位的长期趋势及其对早产的影响。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006 May;20(3):182-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00711.x.
3
Decreasing trend in preterm birth and perinatal mortality, do disparities also decline?早产和围产儿死亡率呈下降趋势,差距是否也在缩小?
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 26;20(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08925-w.
4
Association of preterm birth with long-term survival, reproduction, and next-generation preterm birth.早产与长期生存、生殖及下一代早产的关联。
JAMA. 2008 Mar 26;299(12):1429-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.12.1429.
5
Socio-economic inequality in preterm birth: a comparative study of the Nordic countries from 1981 to 2000.早产方面的社会经济不平等:对1981年至2000年北欧国家的比较研究
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;23(1):66-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00977.x.
6
Socioeconomic disparities in small-for-gestational-age birth and preterm birth.社会经济差异与小于胎龄儿和早产。
Health Rep. 2017 Nov 15;28(11):3-10.
7
Does smoking during pregnancy mediate educational disparities in preterm delivery? Findings from three large birth cohorts.孕期吸烟是否会加剧早产的教育差异?来自三个大型出生队列的研究结果。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;33(2):164-171. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12544.
8
Investigating socio-economic disparities in preterm birth: evidence for selective study participation and selection bias.调查早产中的社会经济差异:选择性研究参与和选择偏倚的证据。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;23(4):301-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01042.x.
9
Risk factors associated with preterm birth among singletons following assisted reproductive technology in Australia 2007-2009--a population-based retrospective study.2007 - 2009年澳大利亚单胎辅助生殖技术后早产相关危险因素——一项基于人群的回顾性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Dec 7;14:406. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0406-y.
10
Association between maternal country of birth and preterm birth: A population-based register study of 910,752 deliveries.母亲出生地与早产的关联:基于人群的 910752 例分娩的注册研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Dec;49(8):904-913. doi: 10.1177/1403494821992894. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Timing of progesterone treatment to prevent preterm birth in pregnancies with a short cervix: A population-based historical cohort study.孕激素治疗预防宫颈短的妊娠早产的时机:一项基于人群的历史性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Aug;104(8):1443-1451. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15147. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
2
Predictors of preterm births in North Dakota: a retrospective study of the North Dakota Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS).北达科他州早产的预测因素:对北达科他州妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)的回顾性研究。
PeerJ. 2025 Mar 17;13:e19049. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19049. eCollection 2025.
3
Citizen science as an instrument for women's health research.
公民科学作为女性健康研究的一种手段。
Nat Med. 2024 Dec;30(12):3445-3454. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03371-2. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
4
Health Care Professionals' and Parents' Perspectives on the Use of AI for Pain Monitoring in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Multisite Qualitative Study.医疗保健专业人员和家长对在新生儿重症监护病房使用人工智能进行疼痛监测的看法:多地点定性研究
JMIR AI. 2024 Feb 9;3:e51535. doi: 10.2196/51535.
5
Prevalence of preterm birth in Scandinavian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.斯堪的纳维亚国家早产的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Oct;51(10):3000605231203843. doi: 10.1177/03000605231203843.
6
Evaluation of Short-Term Outcomes of Preterm Infants in 2 Periods: Vermont Oxford Network Results of a Developing Country's Single- Center Level IIIC Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Experience.两个时期早产儿短期结局的评估:佛蒙特牛津网络关于一个发展中国家单中心IIIC级新生儿重症监护病房经验的结果
Turk Arch Pediatr. 2023 Mar;58(2):159-167. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2023.22253.
7
Prevalence and predictors of spontaneous preterm births in Nepal: findings from a prospective, population-based pregnancy cohort in rural Nepal-a secondary data analysis.尼泊尔自发性早产的流行率和预测因素:尼泊尔农村一项前瞻性、基于人群的妊娠队列研究的结果——二次数据分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 1;12(12):e066934. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066934.
8
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admissions among Preterm Babies in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.早产儿在三级护理中心入住新生儿重症监护病房的情况:一项描述性的横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022 Apr 15;60(248):364-368. doi: 10.31729/jnma.7240.
9
Extremely and Very Preterm Deliveries in a Maternity Unit of Inappropriate Level: Analysis of Socio-Residential Factors.不适当水平产科病房的极早产和超早产分娩:社会居住因素分析
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Apr 14;13:273-285. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S288046. eCollection 2021.
10
Association between maternal country of birth and preterm birth: A population-based register study of 910,752 deliveries.母亲出生地与早产的关联:基于人群的 910752 例分娩的注册研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Dec;49(8):904-913. doi: 10.1177/1403494821992894. Epub 2021 Feb 15.