Jamroz Michal, Kolinski Andrzej, Kihara Daisuke
Department of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, 02-093, Poland.
Department of Biological Sciences Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Bioinformatics. 2016 Jun 15;32(12):i314-i321. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw262.
Comparing protein tertiary structures is a fundamental procedure in structural biology and protein bioinformatics. Structure comparison is important particularly for evaluating computational protein structure models. Most of the model structure evaluation methods perform rigid body superimposition of a structure model to its crystal structure and measure the difference of the corresponding residue or atom positions between them. However, these methods neglect intrinsic flexibility of proteins by treating the native structure as a rigid molecule. Because different parts of proteins have different levels of flexibility, for example, exposed loop regions are usually more flexible than the core region of a protein structure, disagreement of a model to the native needs to be evaluated differently depending on the flexibility of residues in a protein.
We propose a score named FlexScore for comparing protein structures that consider flexibility of each residue in the native state of proteins. Flexibility information may be extracted from experiments such as NMR or molecular dynamics simulation. FlexScore considers an ensemble of conformations of a protein described as a multivariate Gaussian distribution of atomic displacements and compares a query computational model with the ensemble. We compare FlexScore with other commonly used structure similarity scores over various examples. FlexScore agrees with experts' intuitive assessment of computational models and provides information of practical usefulness of models.
https://bitbucket.org/mjamroz/flexscore
Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
比较蛋白质三级结构是结构生物学和蛋白质生物信息学中的一个基本过程。结构比较对于评估计算得到的蛋白质结构模型尤为重要。大多数模型结构评估方法将结构模型与晶体结构进行刚体叠加,并测量它们之间相应残基或原子位置的差异。然而,这些方法将天然结构视为刚性分子,从而忽略了蛋白质的内在柔性。由于蛋白质的不同部分具有不同程度的柔性,例如,暴露的环区通常比蛋白质结构的核心区域更具柔性,因此需要根据蛋白质中残基的柔性来不同地评估模型与天然结构的差异。
我们提出了一种名为FlexScore的分数,用于比较蛋白质结构,该分数考虑了蛋白质天然状态下每个残基的柔性。柔性信息可以从诸如核磁共振(NMR)或分子动力学模拟等实验中提取。FlexScore考虑了将蛋白质构象集合描述为原子位移的多元高斯分布,并将查询计算模型与该集合进行比较。我们在各种示例中将FlexScore与其他常用的结构相似性分数进行了比较。FlexScore与专家对计算模型的直观评估一致,并提供了模型实际有用性的信息。
https://bitbucket.org/mjamroz/flexscore
补充数据可在《生物信息学》在线获取。