• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FlexE:使用弹性网络模型比较蛋白质结构模型。

FlexE: Using elastic network models to compare models of protein structure.

作者信息

Perez Alberto, Yang Zheng, Bahar Ivet, Dill Ken A, MacCallum Justin L

机构信息

Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5252.

Department of Computational and Systems Biology, and Clinical & Translational Science Institute, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3064 BST3, 3501 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

出版信息

J Chem Theory Comput. 2012 Oct 9;8(10):3985-3991. doi: 10.1021/ct300148f.

DOI:10.1021/ct300148f
PMID:25530735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4269272/
Abstract

It is often valuable to compare protein structures to determine how similar they are. Structure comparison methods such as RMSD and GDT-TS are based solely on fixed geometry and do not take into account the intrinsic flexibility or energy landscape of the protein. We propose a method, which we call FlexE, that is based on a simple elastic network model and uses the deformation energy as measure of the similarity between two structures. FlexE can distinguish biologically relevant conformational changes from random changes, while existing geometry-based methods cannot. Additionally, FlexE incorporates the concept of thermal energy, which provides a rational way to determine when two models are "the same". FlexE provides a unique measure of the similarity between protein structures that is complementary to existing methods.

摘要

比较蛋白质结构以确定它们的相似程度通常很有价值。诸如均方根偏差(RMSD)和全局距离测试-全原子分数(GDT-TS)等结构比较方法仅基于固定的几何形状,并未考虑蛋白质的内在灵活性或能量态势。我们提出了一种方法,我们称之为FlexE,它基于一个简单的弹性网络模型,并使用变形能作为衡量两个结构之间相似性的指标。FlexE能够区分生物学上相关的构象变化和随机变化,而现有的基于几何形状的方法则无法做到。此外,FlexE纳入了热能的概念,这为确定两个模型何时“相同”提供了一种合理的方式。FlexE提供了一种独特的蛋白质结构相似性度量,它是对现有方法的补充。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/02e5a4a41596/nihms373222f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/82d999e1f8ee/nihms373222f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/ccb49cdb0a81/nihms373222f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/bf4179c3517f/nihms373222f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/21fcbb323cad/nihms373222f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/329c2f32ed09/nihms373222f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/27af36fc9036/nihms373222f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/02e5a4a41596/nihms373222f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/82d999e1f8ee/nihms373222f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/ccb49cdb0a81/nihms373222f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/bf4179c3517f/nihms373222f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/21fcbb323cad/nihms373222f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/329c2f32ed09/nihms373222f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/27af36fc9036/nihms373222f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1337/4269272/02e5a4a41596/nihms373222f7.jpg

相似文献

1
FlexE: Using elastic network models to compare models of protein structure.FlexE:使用弹性网络模型比较蛋白质结构模型。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2012 Oct 9;8(10):3985-3991. doi: 10.1021/ct300148f.
2
FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.FlexE:考虑蛋白质结构变异的高效分子对接
J Mol Biol. 2001 Apr 27;308(2):377-95. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4551.
3
Ensemble docking into flexible active sites. Critical evaluation of FlexE against JNK-3 and beta-secretase.基于柔性活性位点的集成对接。针对JNK-3和β-分泌酶对FlexE进行的关键评估。
J Chem Inf Model. 2006 Jul-Aug;46(4):1795-805. doi: 10.1021/ci050412x.
4
Statistics of random protein superpositions: p-values for pairwise structure alignment.随机蛋白质叠加的统计:成对结构比对的p值
J Comput Biol. 2008 Apr;15(3):317-55. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2007.0161.
5
Identifying essential pairwise interactions in elastic network model using the alpha shape theory.使用α形状理论识别弹性网络模型中的基本成对相互作用。
J Comput Chem. 2014 Jun 5;35(15):1111-21. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23587. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
6
Defining and computing optimum RMSD for gapped and weighted multiple-structure alignment.定义和计算带空位及加权的多结构比对的最优均方根偏差。
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2008 Oct-Dec;5(4):525-33. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2008.92.
7
A connection rule for alpha-carbon coarse-grained elastic network models using chemical bond information.一种利用化学键信息的α-碳粗粒度弹性网络模型的连接规则。
J Mol Graph Model. 2006 Jan;24(4):296-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Nov 11.
8
Coarse-grained free energy functions for studying protein conformational changes: a double-well network model.用于研究蛋白质构象变化的粗粒度自由能函数:双阱网络模型
Biophys J. 2007 Dec 1;93(11):3860-71. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.112060. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
9
Using quaternions to calculate RMSD.使用四元数计算均方根偏差(RMSD)。
J Comput Chem. 2004 Nov 30;25(15):1849-57. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20110.
10
A critical comparative assessment of predictions of protein-binding sites for biologically relevant organic compounds.对生物相关有机化合物的蛋白质结合部位预测的关键比较评估。
Structure. 2011 May 11;19(5):613-21. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.02.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of model refinement in CASP14.评估 CASP14 中的模型精化。
Proteins. 2021 Dec;89(12):1852-1869. doi: 10.1002/prot.26185. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
2
Quantifying steric hindrance and topological obstruction to protein structure superposition.量化蛋白质结构叠加的空间位阻和拓扑阻碍。
Algorithms Mol Biol. 2021 Feb 27;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13015-020-00180-3.
3
Blind protein structure prediction using accelerated free-energy simulations.利用加速自由能模拟进行盲蛋白质结构预测。
Sci Adv. 2016 Nov 11;2(11):e1601274. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601274. eCollection 2016 Nov.
4
Ensemble-based evaluation for protein structure models.基于集成的蛋白质结构模型评估
Bioinformatics. 2016 Jun 15;32(12):i314-i321. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw262.
5
CASP11 statistics and the prediction center evaluation system.半胱天冬酶11统计数据及预测中心评估系统
Proteins. 2016 Sep;84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):15-9. doi: 10.1002/prot.25005. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
6
On the importance of the distance measures used to train and test knowledge-based potentials for proteins.论用于训练和测试基于知识的蛋白质势的距离度量的重要性。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 20;9(11):e109335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109335. eCollection 2014.
7
lDDT: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests.lDDT:一种局部无叠加评分方法,用于通过距离差异测试比较蛋白质结构和模型。
Bioinformatics. 2013 Nov 1;29(21):2722-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
8
Evaluation of predictions in the CASP10 model refinement category.在蛋白质结构预测技术关键评估(CASP)10模型优化类别中对预测结果的评估。
Proteins. 2014 Feb;82 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):98-111. doi: 10.1002/prot.24377. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Approaching Elastic Network Models to Molecular Dynamics Flexibility.分子动力学灵活性的弹性网络模型研究
J Chem Theory Comput. 2010 Sep 14;6(9):2910-23. doi: 10.1021/ct100208e.
2
Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9.评估 CASP9 中的蛋白质结构精修。
Proteins. 2011;79 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):74-90. doi: 10.1002/prot.23131. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
3
Pre-existing soft modes of motion uniquely defined by native contact topology facilitate ligand binding to proteins.固有接触拓扑结构所特有的预先存在的软模运动促进了配体与蛋白质的结合。
Protein Sci. 2011 Oct;20(10):1645-58. doi: 10.1002/pro.711. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
4
A New Method for Coarse-Grained Elastic Normal-Mode Analysis.一种用于粗粒度弹性正则模态分析的新方法。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2006;2(3):464-471. doi: 10.1021/ct050307u.
5
ProDy: protein dynamics inferred from theory and experiments.ProDy:从理论和实验推断的蛋白质动力学。
Bioinformatics. 2011 Jun 1;27(11):1575-7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr168. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
6
Validating and improving elastic network models with molecular dynamics simulations.使用分子动力学模拟验证和改进弹性网络模型。
Proteins. 2011 Jan;79(1):23-34. doi: 10.1002/prot.22855. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
7
Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function.蛋白质的全球动力学:连接结构与功能。
Annu Rev Biophys. 2010;39:23-42. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.093008.131258.
8
The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition.动态构象集合在生物分子识别中的作用。
Nat Chem Biol. 2009 Nov;5(11):789-96. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.232.
9
Assessment of the protein-structure refinement category in CASP8.评估 CASP8 中的蛋白质结构精修类别。
Proteins. 2009;77 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):66-80. doi: 10.1002/prot.22538.
10
Protein elastic network models and the ranges of cooperativity.蛋白质弹性网络模型与协同性范围
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 28;106(30):12347-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902159106. Epub 2009 Jul 14.