Holmes Carissa Baker, King Brian A, Babb Stephen D
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Mailstop F-79, Atlanta, GA 30341. Email:
Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jun 16;13:E80. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150409.
Increasing tobacco excise taxes and implementing comprehensive smoke-free laws are two of the most effective population-level strategies to reduce tobacco use, prevent tobacco use initiation, and protect nonsmokers from secondhand smoke. We examined state laws related to smoke-free buildings and to cigarette excise taxes from 2000 through 2014 to see how implementation of these laws from 2000 through 2009 differs from implementation in more recent years (2010-2014).
We used legislative data from LexisNexis, an online legal research database, to examine changes in statewide smoke-free laws and cigarette excise taxes in effect from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2014. A comprehensive smoke-free law was defined as a statewide law prohibiting smoking in all indoor areas of private work sites, restaurants, and bars.
From 2000 through 2009, 21 states and the District of Columbia implemented comprehensive smoke-free laws prohibiting smoking in work sites, restaurants, and bars. In 2010, 4 states implemented comprehensive smoke-free laws. The last state to implement a comprehensive smoke-free law was North Dakota in 2012, bringing the total number to 26 states and the District of Columbia. From 2000 through 2009, 46 states and the District of Columbia implemented laws increasing their cigarette excise tax, which increased the national average state excise tax rate by $0.92. However, from 2010 through 2014, only 14 states and the District of Columbia increased their excise tax, which increased the national average state excise tax rate by $0.20.
The recent stall in progress in enacting and implementing statewide comprehensive smoke-free laws and increasing cigarette excise taxes may undermine tobacco prevention and control efforts in the United States, undercutting efforts to reduce tobacco use, exposure to secondhand smoke, health disparities, and tobacco-related illness and death.
提高烟草消费税和实施全面的无烟法律是减少烟草使用、防止开始使用烟草以及保护非吸烟者免受二手烟危害的两项最有效的针对全体人群的策略。我们研究了2000年至2014年期间与无烟建筑和香烟消费税相关的州法律,以了解2000年至2009年这些法律的实施情况与近年来(2010 - 2014年)实施情况有何不同。
我们使用在线法律研究数据库LexisNexis中的立法数据,研究2000年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间生效的全州无烟法律和香烟消费税的变化。全面的无烟法律被定义为一项全州范围的法律,禁止在私人工作场所、餐馆和酒吧的所有室内区域吸烟。
2000年至2009年期间,21个州和哥伦比亚特区实施了全面的无烟法律,禁止在工作场所、餐馆和酒吧吸烟。2010年,有4个州实施了全面的无烟法律。最后一个实施全面无烟法律的州是北达科他州,于2012年实施,使实施此类法律的州和哥伦比亚特区总数达到26个。2000年至2009年期间,46个州和哥伦比亚特区实施了提高香烟消费税的法律,这使得全国平均州消费税税率提高了0.92美元。然而,2010年至2014年期间,只有14个州和哥伦比亚特区提高了消费税,这使得全国平均州消费税税率仅提高了0.20美元。
近期在制定和实施全州范围的全面无烟法律以及提高香烟消费税方面进展停滞,可能会破坏美国的烟草预防和控制工作,削弱减少烟草使用、二手烟暴露、健康差距以及与烟草相关的疾病和死亡的努力。