• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地方零售烟草环境监管:美国的早期采用情况

Local Retail Tobacco Environment Regulation: Early Adoption in the United States.

作者信息

Combs Todd B, Brosi Deena, Chaitan Veronica, He Eda, Luke Douglas A, Henriksen Lisa A

机构信息

Washington University in St. Louis, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Center for Public Health Systems Science, St. Louis, MO.

Stanford University, Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, CA.

出版信息

Tob Regul Sci. 2019 Jan;5(1):76-86.

PMID:38222289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10786621/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify sociodemographic and policy environment characteristics of early adopters of retail tobacco control policies in U.S. localities.

METHODS

We interviewed a sample of local tobacco control programs on policy progress for 33 specific policies, along with other program characteristics. We combine these results with secondary data in logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty (82% of 97) county tobacco control programs from 24 states were interviewed. Localities with lower smoking rates (OR: 0.7; 95%: 0.6-0.9) or higher excise taxes (OR: 6.0; 95%: 1.4-26.0) were more likely to have adopted a retail policy by late 2015. Early adopters were less likely to have voted majority Republican in the 2012 election (OR: 0.03; 95%: 0.00-0.34) or to have higher percentages of African American population (OR: 0.9; 95%: 0.8-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

While localities with more resources, , program capacity, political will or policy options, were more likely to adopt policies by 2015, those with higher smoking rates and proportions of priority populations were less likely to do so. As local retail policy work becomes more commonplace, only time will tell if this "rich-get-richer" trend continues, or if the contexts in which retail policies are adopted diversify.

摘要

目标

确定美国各地零售烟草控制政策早期采用者的社会人口统计学和政策环境特征。

方法

我们就33项具体政策的政策进展情况以及其他项目特征,对一部分地方烟草控制项目进行了访谈。我们将这些结果与二手数据相结合进行逻辑回归分析。

结果

对来自24个州的80个(占97个的82%)县烟草控制项目进行了访谈。吸烟率较低(比值比:0.7;95%置信区间:0.6 - 0.9)或消费税较高(比值比:6.0;95%置信区间:1.4 - 26.0)的地区在2015年末更有可能采用零售政策。早期采用者在2012年选举中投票支持共和党的可能性较小(比值比:0.03;95%置信区间:0.00 - 0.34),非裔美国人口比例较高的可能性也较小(比值比:0.9;95%置信区间:0.8 - 0.99)。

结论

虽然资源更多、项目能力更强、政治意愿更高或政策选择更多的地区在2015年更有可能采用政策,但吸烟率较高和优先人群比例较高的地区采用政策的可能性较小。随着地方零售政策工作变得越来越普遍,只有时间才能证明这种“富者愈富”的趋势是否会持续,或者采用零售政策的背景是否会多样化。

相似文献

1
Local Retail Tobacco Environment Regulation: Early Adoption in the United States.地方零售烟草环境监管:美国的早期采用情况
Tob Regul Sci. 2019 Jan;5(1):76-86.
2
State Level Point-of-Sale Policy Priority as a Result of the FSPTCA.作为《联邦烟草产品消费税法案》的结果,州级销售点政策重点
AIMS Public Health. 2015;2(4):681-690. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.681. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
3
Geographical distribution and social determinants of Tobacco 21 policy adoption and retail inspections in the United States, 2015-2019.2015 - 2019年美国烟草21政策采用情况及零售检查的地理分布和社会决定因素
Tob Induc Dis. 2021 Sep 16;19:55. doi: 10.18332/tid/140148. eCollection 2021.
4
Tapping Into Multiple Data "Springs" to Strengthen Policy Streams: A Guide to the Types of Data Needed to Formulate Local Retail Tobacco Control Policy.挖掘多个数据“源泉”以增强政策流:制定地方零售烟草控制政策所需数据类型指南。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Apr 4;16:E43. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180282.
5
State political ideology, policies and health behaviors: The case of tobacco.国家政治意识形态、政策与健康行为:以烟草为例。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 May;181:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.056. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
6
The availability of electronic cigarettes in U.S. retail outlets, 2012: results of two national studies.2012年美国零售商店电子烟的可获得性:两项全国性研究的结果
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii10-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051461.
7
Tobacco retail policy landscape: a longitudinal survey of US states.烟草零售政策概况:对美国各州的纵向调查
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i44-i51. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053075.
8
Tobacco 21 Policies in the U.S.: The Importance of Local Control With Federal Policy.美国的烟草 21 政策:地方控制与联邦政策同等重要。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 May;60(5):639-647. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.12.009. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
9
Policies regulating retail environment to reduce tobacco availability: A scoping review.监管零售环境以减少烟草供应的政策:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;11:975065. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.975065. eCollection 2023.
10
Retail Pharmacy Policy to End the Sale of Tobacco Products: What Is the Impact on Disparity in Neighborhood Density of Tobacco Outlets?零售药店终止烟草制品销售政策:对社区烟草销售点密度差异有何影响?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Sep;25(9):1305-10. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1234. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A statewide study of disparities in local policies and tobacco, vape, and cannabis retail environments.一项关于地方政策以及烟草、电子烟和大麻零售环境差异的全州范围研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug 20;35:102373. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102373. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Characteristics and Reach Equity of Policies Restricting Flavored Tobacco Product Sales in the United States.美国限制调味烟草产品销售政策的特点及公平性覆盖范围
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1_suppl):44S-53S. doi: 10.1177/1524839919879928.

本文引用的文献

1
Taking Stock of Tobacco Control Program and Policy Science and Impact in the United States.评估美国的烟草控制项目、政策科学及影响。
J Addict Behav Ther. 2017;1(2). Epub 2017 Sep 15.
2
Tobacco Town: Computational Modeling of Policy Options to Reduce Tobacco Retailer Density.烟草镇:降低烟草零售商密度政策选项的计算模型
Am J Public Health. 2017 May;107(5):740-746. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303685.
3
Tobacco industry's T.O.T.A.L. interference.烟草行业的全面干预。
Tob Control. 2018 Mar;27(2):234-236. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053530. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
4
The Social Determinants of Health Core: Taking a Place-Based Approach.健康的社会决定因素核心:采用基于地点的方法。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jan;52(1S1):S13-S19. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.025.
5
Effectiveness of Local Policy Efforts to Increase the Price of Cheap Cigars in Minnesota.明尼苏达州提高廉价雪茄价格的地方政策措施的成效。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jan;107(1):127-129. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303517. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
6
The Case for a Concerted Push to Reduce Place-Based Disparities in Smoking-Related Cancers.齐心协力推动减少基于地域的吸烟相关癌症差异的理由。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1799-1800. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6865.
7
Standardized Tobacco Assessment for Retail Settings (STARS): dissemination and implementation research.零售场所标准化烟草评估(STARS):传播与实施研究
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i67-i74. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053076.
8
Tobacco retail policy landscape: a longitudinal survey of US states.烟草零售政策概况:对美国各州的纵向调查
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i44-i51. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053075.
9
Success in the city: the road to implementation of Tobacco 21 and Sensible Tobacco Enforcement in New York City.城市中的成功:纽约市实施《21岁烟草销售限制法》及合理烟草执法之路。
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i6-i9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053089.
10
Tobacco retail outlet restrictions: health and cost impacts from multistate life-table modelling in a national population.烟草零售点限制:全国人口多州生命表模型的健康和成本影响
Tob Control. 2016 Sep 22. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052846.