Suppr超能文献

地方零售烟草环境监管:美国的早期采用情况

Local Retail Tobacco Environment Regulation: Early Adoption in the United States.

作者信息

Combs Todd B, Brosi Deena, Chaitan Veronica, He Eda, Luke Douglas A, Henriksen Lisa A

机构信息

Washington University in St. Louis, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Center for Public Health Systems Science, St. Louis, MO.

Stanford University, Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, CA.

出版信息

Tob Regul Sci. 2019 Jan;5(1):76-86.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify sociodemographic and policy environment characteristics of early adopters of retail tobacco control policies in U.S. localities.

METHODS

We interviewed a sample of local tobacco control programs on policy progress for 33 specific policies, along with other program characteristics. We combine these results with secondary data in logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty (82% of 97) county tobacco control programs from 24 states were interviewed. Localities with lower smoking rates (OR: 0.7; 95%: 0.6-0.9) or higher excise taxes (OR: 6.0; 95%: 1.4-26.0) were more likely to have adopted a retail policy by late 2015. Early adopters were less likely to have voted majority Republican in the 2012 election (OR: 0.03; 95%: 0.00-0.34) or to have higher percentages of African American population (OR: 0.9; 95%: 0.8-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

While localities with more resources, , program capacity, political will or policy options, were more likely to adopt policies by 2015, those with higher smoking rates and proportions of priority populations were less likely to do so. As local retail policy work becomes more commonplace, only time will tell if this "rich-get-richer" trend continues, or if the contexts in which retail policies are adopted diversify.

摘要

目标

确定美国各地零售烟草控制政策早期采用者的社会人口统计学和政策环境特征。

方法

我们就33项具体政策的政策进展情况以及其他项目特征,对一部分地方烟草控制项目进行了访谈。我们将这些结果与二手数据相结合进行逻辑回归分析。

结果

对来自24个州的80个(占97个的82%)县烟草控制项目进行了访谈。吸烟率较低(比值比:0.7;95%置信区间:0.6 - 0.9)或消费税较高(比值比:6.0;95%置信区间:1.4 - 26.0)的地区在2015年末更有可能采用零售政策。早期采用者在2012年选举中投票支持共和党的可能性较小(比值比:0.03;95%置信区间:0.00 - 0.34),非裔美国人口比例较高的可能性也较小(比值比:0.9;95%置信区间:0.8 - 0.99)。

结论

虽然资源更多、项目能力更强、政治意愿更高或政策选择更多的地区在2015年更有可能采用政策,但吸烟率较高和优先人群比例较高的地区采用政策的可能性较小。随着地方零售政策工作变得越来越普遍,只有时间才能证明这种“富者愈富”的趋势是否会持续,或者采用零售政策的背景是否会多样化。

相似文献

2
State Level Point-of-Sale Policy Priority as a Result of the FSPTCA.
AIMS Public Health. 2015;2(4):681-690. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.681. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
5
State political ideology, policies and health behaviors: The case of tobacco.
Soc Sci Med. 2017 May;181:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.056. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
6
The availability of electronic cigarettes in U.S. retail outlets, 2012: results of two national studies.
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii10-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051461.
7
Tobacco retail policy landscape: a longitudinal survey of US states.
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i44-i51. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053075.
8
Tobacco 21 Policies in the U.S.: The Importance of Local Control With Federal Policy.
Am J Prev Med. 2021 May;60(5):639-647. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.12.009. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
9
Policies regulating retail environment to reduce tobacco availability: A scoping review.
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;11:975065. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.975065. eCollection 2023.
10
Retail Pharmacy Policy to End the Sale of Tobacco Products: What Is the Impact on Disparity in Neighborhood Density of Tobacco Outlets?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Sep;25(9):1305-10. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1234. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A statewide study of disparities in local policies and tobacco, vape, and cannabis retail environments.
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug 20;35:102373. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102373. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Characteristics and Reach Equity of Policies Restricting Flavored Tobacco Product Sales in the United States.
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1_suppl):44S-53S. doi: 10.1177/1524839919879928.

本文引用的文献

2
Tobacco Town: Computational Modeling of Policy Options to Reduce Tobacco Retailer Density.
Am J Public Health. 2017 May;107(5):740-746. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303685.
3
Tobacco industry's T.O.T.A.L. interference.
Tob Control. 2018 Mar;27(2):234-236. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053530. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
4
The Social Determinants of Health Core: Taking a Place-Based Approach.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jan;52(1S1):S13-S19. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.025.
5
Effectiveness of Local Policy Efforts to Increase the Price of Cheap Cigars in Minnesota.
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jan;107(1):127-129. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303517. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
6
The Case for a Concerted Push to Reduce Place-Based Disparities in Smoking-Related Cancers.
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1799-1800. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6865.
7
Standardized Tobacco Assessment for Retail Settings (STARS): dissemination and implementation research.
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i67-i74. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053076.
8
Tobacco retail policy landscape: a longitudinal survey of US states.
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i44-i51. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053075.
9
Success in the city: the road to implementation of Tobacco 21 and Sensible Tobacco Enforcement in New York City.
Tob Control. 2016 Oct;25(Suppl 1):i6-i9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053089.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验