Reid Lindsay E M, Dinesen Lotte C, Jones Michael C, Morrison Zoe J, Weir Christopher J, Lone Nazir I
The Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, Quality, Research and Standards Office, 9 Queen Street, EH2 1JQ Edinburgh, UK Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Sep;28(4):433-46. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw056. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
To evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness of acute medical units (AMUs) compared with other models of care and compare the components of AMU models.
Six electronic databases and grey literature sources searched between 1990 and 2014.
Studies reporting on AMUs as an intervention for unplanned medical presentations to hospital with the inclusion of all outcome measures/study designs/comparators.
Data on study characteristics/outcomes/AMU components were extracted by one author and confirmed by a second.
Seventeen studies of 12 AMUs across five countries were included. The AMU model was associated with a reduction in-hospital length of stay (LOS) in all analyses ranging from 0.3 to 2.6 days; and a reduction in mortality in 12 of the 14 analyses with the change ranging from a 0.1% increase to a 8.8% reduction. Evidence relating to readmissions and patient/staff satisfaction was less conclusive. There was variation in the following components of AMUs: admission criteria, entry sources, functions and consultant work patterns.
This review provides evidence that AMUs are associated with reductions in-hospital LOS and, less convincingly, mortality compared with other models of care when implemented in European and Australasian settings. Reported estimates may be affected by residual confounding. This review reports heterogeneity in components of the AMU model. Further work to identify what constitutes the key components of an AMU is needed to improve the quality and effectiveness of acute medical care. This is of particular importance given the escalating demand on acute services.
评估急性医疗单元(AMU)相较于其他护理模式有效性的证据,并比较AMU模式的组成部分。
检索了1990年至2014年期间的六个电子数据库和灰色文献来源。
报告将AMU作为医院非计划就诊干预措施的研究,纳入所有结局指标/研究设计/对照。
由一位作者提取关于研究特征/结局/AMU组成部分的数据,并由另一位作者进行确认。
纳入了来自五个国家的12个AMU的17项研究。在所有分析中,AMU模式与住院时间(LOS)缩短相关,缩短幅度为0.3至2.6天;在14项分析中的12项中,AMU模式与死亡率降低相关,变化幅度从增加0.1%至降低8.8%。关于再入院率以及患者/工作人员满意度的证据不太确凿。AMU的以下组成部分存在差异:入院标准、入院来源、功能和顾问工作模式。
本综述提供的证据表明,在欧洲和澳大拉西亚地区实施时,与其他护理模式相比,AMU与住院LOS缩短相关,而与死亡率降低的关联则不太令人信服。报告的估计值可能受到残余混杂因素影响。本综述报告了AMU模式组成部分的异质性。需要进一步开展工作来确定AMU的关键组成部分,以提高急性医疗护理的质量和有效性。鉴于对急性服务的需求不断增加,这一点尤为重要。