Ünlüer Erden Erol, Urnal Rıfat, Eser Utku, Bilgin Serkan, Hacıyanlı Mehmet, Oyar Orhan, Akoğlu Haldun, Karagöz Arif
Department of Emergency Medicine, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir Katip Çelebi University, Karabağlar, İzmir 35150, Turkey.
Department of General Surgery, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir Katip Çelebi University, Karabağlar, İzmir 35150, Turkey.
World J Emerg Med. 2016;7(2):124-9. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.02.007.
Appendicitis is a common disease requiring surgery. Bedside ultrasound (BUS) is a core technique for emergency medicine (EM). The Alvarado score is a well-studied diagnostic tool for appendicitis. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between patients' symptoms, Alvarado score and ultrasound (US) findings, as performed by emergency physicians (EPs) and radiologists, of patients with suspected appendicitis.
Three EM specialists underwent the BUS course and core course for appendicitis assessment. Patients suspected of having appendicitis were selected and their Alvarado and modified (m) Alvarado scores calculated. The specialists performed the BUS. Then, patients were given a formal US and surgery consultation if necessary. Preliminary diagnoses, admission or discharge from the emergency department (ED) and final diagnosis were documented. The patients were also followed up after discharge from the hospital.
The determined cut-off value was 2 for Alvarado and 3 for mAlvarado scores. The sensitivities of the two scores were 100%. Each score was used to rule out appendicitis. The results of EP-performed BUS were as follows: accuracy 70%, sensitivity 0.733, specificity 0.673, + LR 2.24, and - LR 0.40 (95%CI). Radiologists were better than EPs at diagnosing appendicitis and radiologists and EPs were equally strong at ruling out appendicitis by US. When US was combined with Alvarado and mAlvarado scores, EP US+Alvarado/mAlvarado scores <3 and radiology US+Alvarado/mAlvarado scores <4 perfectly ruled out appendicitis.
BUS performed by EPs is moderately useful in detecting appendicitis. Combined with scoring systems, BUS may be a perfect tool for ruling out decisions in EDs.
阑尾炎是一种常见的需要手术治疗的疾病。床边超声(BUS)是急诊医学(EM)的一项核心技术。阿尔瓦拉多评分是一种经过充分研究的阑尾炎诊断工具。本研究旨在调查疑似阑尾炎患者的症状、阿尔瓦拉多评分与超声(US)检查结果之间的关系,这些检查由急诊医生(EPs)和放射科医生进行。
三名急诊医学专家参加了阑尾炎评估的BUS课程和核心课程。选择疑似阑尾炎的患者并计算他们的阿尔瓦拉多评分和改良(m)阿尔瓦拉多评分。专家们进行床边超声检查。然后,如有必要,患者接受正式的超声检查和手术会诊。记录初步诊断、急诊科(ED)的入院或出院情况以及最终诊断。患者出院后也进行了随访。
确定的阿尔瓦拉多评分临界值为2,改良阿尔瓦拉多评分临界值为3。两个评分的敏感性均为100%。每个评分都用于排除阑尾炎。急诊医生进行床边超声检查的结果如下:准确率70%,敏感性0.733,特异性0.673,阳性似然比2.24,阴性似然比0.40(95%置信区间)。放射科医生在诊断阑尾炎方面比急诊医生更出色,而在通过超声排除阑尾炎方面,放射科医生和急诊医生同样出色。当超声检查与阿尔瓦拉多评分和改良阿尔瓦拉多评分相结合时,急诊医生的超声检查+阿尔瓦拉多/改良阿尔瓦拉多评分<3以及放射科医生的超声检查+阿尔瓦拉多/改良阿尔瓦拉多评分<4能够完美排除阑尾炎。
急诊医生进行的床边超声检查在检测阑尾炎方面有一定作用。结合评分系统,床边超声检查可能是急诊科排除诊断的理想工具。