Stiel Carolin, Elrod Julia, Klinke Michaela, Herrmann Jochen, Junge Carl-Martin, Ghadban Tarik, Reinshagen Konrad, Boettcher Michael
Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Pediatr. 2020 Nov 17;8:592892. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.592892. eCollection 2020.
Acute appendicitis represents the most frequent reason for abdominal surgery in children. Since diagnosis can be challenging various scoring systems have been published. The aim of this study was to evaluate and validate (and improve) different appendicitis scores in a very large cohort of children with abdominal pain. Retrospective analysis of all children that have been hospitalized due to suspected appendicitis at the Pediatric Surgery Department of the Altonaer Children's Hospital and University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf from 01/2018 until 11/2019. Four different appendicitis scores (Heidelberg Appendicitis Score, Alvarado Score, Pediatric Appendicitis Score and Tzanakis Score) were applied to all data sets. Furthermore, the best score was improved and artificial intelligence (AI) was applied and compare the current scores. In 23 months, 463 patients were included in the study. Of those 348 (75.2%) were operated for suspected appendicitis and in 336 (96.6%) patients the diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically. The best predictors of appendicitis (simple and perforated) were rebound tenderness, cough/hopping tenderness, ultrasound, and laboratory results. After modifying the HAS, it provided excellent results for simple (PPV 95.0%, NPV 70.0%) and very good for perforated appendicitis (PPV 34.4%, NPV 93.8%), outperforming all other appendicitis score. The modified HAS and the AI score show excellent predictive capabilities and may be used to identify most cases of appendicitis and more important to rule out perforated appendicitis. The new scores outperform all other scores and are simple to apply. The modified HAS comprises five features that can all be assessed in the emergency department as opposed to current scores that are relatively complex to utilize in a clinical setting as they include of up to eight features with various weighting factors. In conclusion, the modified HAS and the AI score may be used to identify children with appendicitis, yet prospective studies to validate our findings in a large mutli-center cohorts are needed.
急性阑尾炎是儿童腹部手术最常见的原因。由于诊断具有挑战性,已发布了各种评分系统。本研究的目的是在一大群腹痛儿童中评估和验证(并改进)不同的阑尾炎评分。对2018年1月至2019年11月在阿尔托纳儿童医院和汉堡-埃彭多夫大学医学中心小儿外科因疑似阑尾炎住院的所有儿童进行回顾性分析。将四种不同的阑尾炎评分(海德堡阑尾炎评分、阿尔瓦拉多评分、小儿阑尾炎评分和察纳基斯评分)应用于所有数据集。此外,对最佳评分进行了改进,并应用人工智能(AI)并比较当前评分。在23个月内,463例患者纳入研究。其中348例(75.2%)因疑似阑尾炎接受手术,336例(96.6%)患者经组织病理学确诊。阑尾炎(单纯性和穿孔性)的最佳预测指标是反跳痛、咳嗽/跳跃痛、超声检查和实验室检查结果。修改后的海德堡阑尾炎评分(HAS)对单纯性阑尾炎(阳性预测值95.0%,阴性预测值70.0%)效果极佳,对穿孔性阑尾炎(阳性预测值34.4%,阴性预测值93.8%)效果很好,优于所有其他阑尾炎评分。修改后的HAS和AI评分显示出出色的预测能力,可用于识别大多数阑尾炎病例,更重要的是排除穿孔性阑尾炎。新评分优于所有其他评分且易于应用。修改后的HAS包含五个特征,所有这些特征都可以在急诊科进行评估,而目前的评分在临床环境中使用相对复杂,因为它们包括多达八个具有不同加权因子的特征。总之,修改后的HAS和AI评分可用于识别阑尾炎患儿,但需要进行前瞻性研究以在大型多中心队列中验证我们的发现。