Worthington Andrew
NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 13;39(1):163-74. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161348.
Apraxia and Action Disorganisation Syndrome are characterised by an inability to use tools and carry out ordered sequences of movements in the absence of motor or sensory impairment. To date treatment for these complex but debilitating conditions has received little attention.
To provide an overview of apraxia and action disorganisation syndrome and its treatment, providing a state of the art summary for practitioners including likely future therapeutic directions.
Review of apraxia literature and treatment studies collated from internet searches involving MEDLINE, PubMed, PyscINFO and Google Scholar as well as the author's own catalogue.
Evidence for current restitution and compensatory approaches is critically reviewed, with limited evidence to date in support of either method. Strategy training is the most promising intervention type with no support for sensory and exploratory interventions, practice effects only for direct task-specific training, and modest support for gestural training.
Larger controlled studies are needed but evidence is sufficient to indicate certain approaches over others. Advances in assistive technology have not translated into mainstream therapy but future interventions are likely to require a model-based approach which embraces current technologies in order to provide a more accessible, effective and cost-efficient approach to rehabilitation.
失用症和动作紊乱综合征的特征是在没有运动或感觉障碍的情况下无法使用工具和执行有序的动作序列。迄今为止,针对这些复杂但使人衰弱的病症的治疗很少受到关注。
概述失用症和动作紊乱综合征及其治疗方法,为从业者提供最新总结,包括未来可能的治疗方向。
回顾从互联网搜索中整理的失用症文献和治疗研究,搜索涉及MEDLINE、PubMed、PyscINFO和谷歌学术,以及作者自己的文献目录。
对当前恢复性和补偿性方法的证据进行了批判性审查,迄今为止支持这两种方法的证据都很有限。策略训练是最有前景的干预类型,感觉和探索性干预没有依据,仅直接针对特定任务的训练有练习效果,手势训练有一定依据。
需要进行更大规模的对照研究,但现有证据足以表明某些方法优于其他方法。辅助技术的进步尚未转化为主流治疗方法,但未来的干预可能需要一种基于模型的方法,融合当前技术,以便提供一种更易获得、有效且具成本效益的康复方法。