Suppr超能文献

初级保健中的姑息治疗咨询:荷兰全科医生的横断面调查。

Palliative care consultations in primary care: a cross-sectional survey among Dutch general practitioners.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;9(4):e30. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000967. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Expert consultation supports general practitioners (GPs) in delivering adequate palliative homecare. Insight into consultation practices from a GP's perspective is needed in order to shape consultation services to their wishes and needs.

AIM

To explore palliative care consultation practices from a GP's perspective.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Cross-sectional web-based survey among all GPs (n=235) in the region of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

METHODS

Our questionnaire contained questions about the delivery of palliative care by GPs, their consultation practices and satisfaction with current services. Questions consisted mainly of 5-point Likert scales. We transformed these scales into numerical values to calculate mean scores. Linear mixed models for repeated measurements were used to study differences in scores.

RESULTS

GPs most often consulted informal caregivers (mean score 3.6) or fellow GPs (mean score 3.3). Physical problems were discussed the most (mean score 3.5), while social and existential issues were discussed least (mean score 1.9 for both). In their choice of a particular consultation service, GPs considered the quality of the provided advice to be the most important factor. GPs were satisfied with current consultation services, with fellow GPs receiving the highest satisfaction scores (mean score 4.6). Finally, when recalling their last palliative patient, most GPs started requesting consultation during this patient's last month of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Next to informal caregivers, GPs preferably seek advice from fellow GPs. Physical issues receive much attention during consultations; however, other vital aspects of palliative care seem to remain relatively neglected, such as social and existential issues and a proactive care approach.

摘要

背景

专家咨询支持全科医生(GP)提供充分的姑息治疗家庭护理。为了满足咨询服务的愿望和需求,需要从 GP 的角度了解咨询实践。

目的

从 GP 的角度探讨姑息治疗咨询实践。

设计和设置

荷兰奈梅亨地区所有全科医生(n=235)的横断面网络调查。

方法

我们的问卷包含关于 GP 提供姑息治疗、他们的咨询实践和对当前服务满意度的问题。问题主要由 5 点李克特量表组成。我们将这些量表转换为数值,以计算平均分数。使用重复测量的线性混合模型来研究分数的差异。

结果

GP 最常咨询非正式照顾者(平均得分 3.6)或其他 GP(平均得分 3.3)。他们讨论最多的是身体问题(平均得分 3.5),而社会和存在问题讨论最少(两者的平均得分均为 1.9)。在选择特定的咨询服务时,GP 认为提供的建议的质量是最重要的因素。GP 对当前的咨询服务感到满意,对其他 GP 的满意度评分最高(平均得分为 4.6)。最后,当回忆起他们的最后一位姑息治疗患者时,大多数 GP 在患者生命的最后一个月开始要求咨询。

结论

除了非正式照顾者外,GP 更倾向于从其他 GP 那里寻求建议。在咨询中,身体问题受到了极大的关注;然而,姑息治疗的其他重要方面似乎仍然相对被忽视,例如社会和存在问题以及积极主动的护理方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验