Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Department of Population Health Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 1;16(6):e0228428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228428. eCollection 2021.
The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that only 17-37% of the approximately 77 million people who need a wheelchair have access to one. Many organizations are trying to address this need through varying service delivery approaches. For instance, some adhere to WHO's recommended 8-steps service approach while others provide wheelchairs with little to no service. There is limited and sometimes conflicting evidence of the impact of the WHO's recommendations on the outcomes of wheelchair provision. To help build this evidence, we \explored outcomes of two groups of users who received their wheelchairs through two service models over time. The 8-Steps group (n = 118) received a wheelchair selected from a range of models from service providers trained using the WHO process, and the standard of care (SOC) group (n = 24) received hospital-style wheelchairs and without clinical service. Interviews were conducted at baseline and at follow-up 3 to 6 months after provision, to collect data about wheelchair usage, satisfaction, skills, maintenance and repairs, and life satisfaction. Across-group statistical comparisons were not appropriate due to significant differences between groups. In general, participants used their wheelchairs every day but reported very low mobility levels (<500 meters for the 8-steps group, and <100 meters for the SOC group.) The 8-steps group used their wheelchair for either between 1-3 hours per day, or more than 8 hours per day. The SOC used it between 1 and 3 hours per day. Overall, wheelchair usage and wheelchair skills decreased over the 3- to 6-month data collection timeline. Wheelchair breakdowns were common in both groups emphasizing the need for maintenance, occurring more frequently in the 8-Steps (28.8%) compared to the SOC group (8%), and emphasizing the need for maintenance services. No significant differences were found when comparing device satisfaction across wheelchairs types. Our results emphasize the need for routine maintenance to address frequent wheelchair breakdowns. Our results also demonstrate a large disparity in several outcome variables across groups which motivates future studies where across-group comparisons are possible.
世界卫生组织(WHO)估计,在大约 7700 万需要轮椅的人中,只有 17-37%能够获得轮椅。许多组织正在通过不同的服务提供方式来满足这一需求。例如,一些组织遵循世卫组织建议的 8 步服务方法,而另一些组织则提供几乎没有服务的轮椅。关于世卫组织建议对轮椅供应结果的影响,证据有限,有时甚至相互矛盾。为了帮助建立这些证据,我们\探索了两组用户在一段时间内通过两种服务模式获得轮椅的结果。8 步组(n=118)从经过世卫组织流程培训的服务提供者提供的一系列模型中选择轮椅,而标准护理(SOC)组(n=24)则获得医院式轮椅,且没有临床服务。在提供服务后 3 至 6 个月进行基线和随访访谈,以收集有关轮椅使用、满意度、技能、维护和修理以及生活满意度的数据。由于组间存在显著差异,因此不适合进行跨组统计比较。总体而言,参与者每天都使用轮椅,但报告的移动水平非常低(8 步组为<500 米,SOC 组为<100 米)。8 步组每天使用轮椅 1-3 小时或 8 小时以上。SOC 每天使用轮椅 1-3 小时。总体而言,在 3 至 6 个月的数据分析时间内,轮椅使用率和轮椅技能下降。两组都经常出现轮椅故障,强调需要维护,8 步组(28.8%)比 SOC 组(8%)更为频繁,强调需要维护服务。在比较不同类型轮椅的设备满意度时,未发现显著差异。我们的结果强调需要进行常规维护,以解决频繁的轮椅故障。我们的结果还表明,各组之间存在几个结果变量的巨大差异,这促使未来进行可能进行跨组比较的研究。