Tucker Jalie A, Cheong JeeWon, Chandler Susan D, Lambert Brice H, Kwok Heather, Pietrzak Brittney
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Addiction. 2016 Nov;111(11):1956-1965. doi: 10.1111/add.13492. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
Research using different behavioral economic (BE) and time perspective (TP) measures suggests that substance misusers show greater sensitivity to shorter-term contingencies than normal controls, but multiple measures have seldom been investigated together. This study evaluated the extent to which multiple BE and TP measures were associated with drinking problem severity, distinguished initial outcomes of natural recovery attempts and shared common variance. Hypotheses were (1) that greater problem severity would be associated with greater impulsivity and demand for alcohol and shorter TPs; and (2) that low-risk drinking would be associated with greater sensitivity to longer-term contingencies compared with abstinence.
Cross-sectional naturalistic field study.
Southern United States.
Problem drinkers, recently resolved without treatment [n = 191 (76.44% male), mean age = 50.09 years] recruited using media advertisements.
Drinking practices, dependence levels and alcohol-related problems prior to stopping problem drinking were assessed during structured field interviews. Measures included the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory; BE analogue choice tasks [delay discounting (DD), melioration-maximization (MM), alcohol purchase task (APT)]; and the Alcohol-Savings Discretionary Expenditure (ASDE) index, derived from real spending on alcohol and voluntary savings during the year before problem cessation.
Measures of demand based on real (ASDE) and hypothetical (APT) spending on alcohol were associated with problem severity (Ps < 0.05), but DD, MM and TP measures were not. More balanced pre-resolution spending on alcohol versus saving for the future distinguished low-risk drinking from abstinent resolutions (ASDE odds ratio =5.59; P < 0.001). BE measures did not share common variance.
Two behavioral assessment tools that measure spending on alcohol, the Alcohol Purchase Task and the Alcohol-Savings Discretionary Expenditure index, appear to be reliable in assessing the severity of drinking problems. The ASDE index also may aid choices between low-risk and abstinent drinking goals.
使用不同行为经济学(BE)和时间视角(TP)测量方法的研究表明,物质滥用者对短期意外情况的敏感度高于正常对照组,但很少同时对多种测量方法进行研究。本研究评估了多种BE和TP测量方法与饮酒问题严重程度的关联程度,区分了自然恢复尝试的初始结果,并共享了共同方差。假设为:(1)问题严重程度越高,冲动性和对酒精的需求越高,时间视角越短;(2)与戒酒相比,低风险饮酒与对长期意外情况的更高敏感度相关。
横断面自然主义实地研究。
美国南部。
通过媒体广告招募的问题饮酒者,最近未经治疗自行戒酒[n = 191(76.44%为男性),平均年龄 = 50.09岁]。
在结构化实地访谈中评估停止问题饮酒前的饮酒习惯、依赖程度和与酒精相关的问题。测量方法包括津巴多时间视角量表;BE模拟选择任务[延迟折扣(DD)、改善最大化(MM)、酒精购买任务(APT)];以及酒精储蓄可自由支配支出(ASDE)指数,该指数源自问题停止前一年在酒精上的实际支出和自愿储蓄。
基于酒精实际(ASDE)和假设(APT)支出的需求测量与问题严重程度相关(P < 0.05),但DD、MM和TP测量方法无关。在解决问题前,酒精支出与为未来储蓄之间更平衡的支出区分了低风险饮酒和戒酒决心(ASDE优势比 = 5.59;P < 0.001)。BE测量方法没有共享共同方差。
两种测量酒精支出的行为评估工具,即酒精购买任务和酒精储蓄可自由支配支出指数,在评估饮酒问题严重程度方面似乎是可靠的。ASDE指数也可能有助于在低风险和戒酒目标之间做出选择。