Giles Tracey, de Lacey Sheryl, Muir-Cochrane Eimear
Flinders University School of Nursing and Midwifery, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Nov;72(11):2706-2717. doi: 10.1111/jan.13046. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
The aim of this study was to examine factors impacting family presence during resuscitation practices in the acute care setting.
Family presence during resuscitation was introduced in the 1980s, so family members/significant others could be with their loved ones during life-threatening events. Evidence demonstrates important benefits; yet despite growing support from the public and endorsement from professional groups, family presence is practiced inconsistently and rationales for poor uptake are unclear.
Constructivist grounded theory design.
Twenty-five health professionals, family members and patients informed the study. In-depth interviews were undertaken between October 2013-November 2014 to interpret and explain their meanings and actions when deciding whether to practice or participate in FPDR.
The Social Construction of Conditional Permission explains the social processes at work when deciding to adopt or reject family presence during resuscitation. These processes included claiming ownership, prioritizing preferences and rights, assessing suitability, setting boundaries and protecting others/self. In the absence of formal policies, decision-making was influenced primarily by peoples' values, preferences and pre-existing expectations around societal roles and associated status between health professionals and consumers. As a result, practices were sporadic, inconsistent and often paternalistic rather than collaborative.
An increased awareness of the important benefits of family presence and the implementation of clinical protocols are recommended as an important starting point to address current variations and inconsistencies in practice. These measures would ensure future practice is guided by evidence and standards for health consumer safety and welfare rather than personal values and preferences of the individuals 'in charge' of permissions.
本研究旨在探讨在急症护理环境中影响复苏操作期间家属在场的因素。
复苏期间家属在场这一做法始于20世纪80年代,以便家庭成员/重要他人能够在危及生命的事件中陪伴他们所爱的人。有证据表明其有重要益处;然而,尽管得到了公众越来越多的支持和专业团体的认可,但家属在场的实施情况并不一致,采用率低的原因尚不清楚。
建构主义扎根理论设计。
25名卫生专业人员、家庭成员和患者为本研究提供了信息。在2013年10月至2014年11月期间进行了深入访谈,以解读和解释他们在决定是否实施或参与复苏期间家属在场时的意义和行为。
“有条件许可的社会建构”解释了在决定是否在复苏期间采用或拒绝家属在场时所涉及的社会过程。这些过程包括主张所有权、优先考虑偏好和权利、评估适用性、设定界限以及保护他人/自我。在缺乏正式政策的情况下,决策主要受到人们的价值观、偏好以及围绕卫生专业人员和消费者之间的社会角色及相关地位的既有期望的影响。结果,做法零散、不一致,且往往是家长式而非协作式的。
建议提高对家属在场重要益处的认识并实施临床方案,以此作为解决当前实践中差异和不一致情况的重要起点。这些措施将确保未来的实践以健康消费者安全和福利的证据及标准为指导,而非以“负责”许可的个人的个人价值观和偏好为指导。