• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内固定螺钉:置入方式与坚固性的比较

Internal screw fixation: comparison of placement pattern and rigidity.

作者信息

Foley W L, Frost D E, Paulin W B, Tucker M R

机构信息

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989 Jul;47(7):720-3. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(89)80013-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0278-2391(89)80013-8
PMID:2732831
Abstract

Multiple screw placement patterns and techniques have been described for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. This study evaluated transverse strength (rigidity) of six groups of simulated sagittal osteotomies fixed with different screw patterns and placement techniques. Osteotomies fixed with screws placed in an inverted L pattern were significantly more rigid than those fixed with screws placed in a linear pattern or K-wires placed in a triangular pattern (P less than .05). No significant difference in rigidity was noted between compression and bicortical screws placed in identical patterns.

摘要

已描述了多种用于矢状劈开下颌支截骨术固定的螺钉置入模式和技术。本研究评估了六组采用不同螺钉模式和置入技术固定的模拟矢状截骨术的横向强度(刚度)。采用倒L形置入螺钉固定的截骨术比采用直线形置入螺钉或三角形置入克氏针固定的截骨术刚度显著更高(P小于0.05)。相同模式下置入的加压螺钉和双皮质螺钉在刚度上无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Internal screw fixation: comparison of placement pattern and rigidity.内固定螺钉:置入方式与坚固性的比较
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989 Jul;47(7):720-3. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(89)80013-8.
2
Comparison of screw placement patterns on the rigidity of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy: technical note.矢状劈开下颌支截骨术螺钉置入方式对坚固性的影响比较:技术说明
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1995 Feb;23(1):54-6. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80257-4.
3
An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术的坚固内固定技术的体外评估:前徙手术
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):809-17. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.009.
4
In vitro comparison of screw versus plate fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy.矢状劈开截骨术中螺钉与钢板固定的体外比较
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1992;7(3):147-51.
5
Functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies: effects of positional screw size and placement configuration.下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术的功能稳定性:定位螺钉尺寸和放置构型的影响
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 May;54(5):601-9: discussion 609-10. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90642-4.
6
An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.一种可调节骨固定系统的体外比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Nov;63(11):1620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.06.008.
7
An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.矢状劈开下颌支截骨术的坚固内固定技术的体外评估:后退手术
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;70(4):941-51. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.106. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
8
Mechanical comparison of fixation techniques for the tibial tubercle osteotomy.胫骨结节截骨术固定技术的力学比较
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Nov(380):241-9. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200011000-00033.
9
Photoelastic analysis of internal screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.矢状劈开下颌支截骨术后内固定螺钉的光弹性分析
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1993 Sep;21(6):266-70. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80045-9.
10
In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.传统与锁定微型钢板/螺钉系统用于下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术的体外生物力学评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;68(4):724-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.018. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.采用三维有限元分析法对当前和新型设计的下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术微型接骨板固定技术的比较评估。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Nov 1;28(6):e553-e561. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25964.
2
Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation techniques following modified sagittal split ramus osteotomy using buccal step: An study.使用颊侧台阶改良矢状劈开下颌支截骨术后不同固定技术的生物力学评估:一项研究。
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Sep-Dec;13(3):443-448. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_321_21. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
3
Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
矢状劈开下颌支截骨术的类型是否会影响固定强度?两种固定方式在三种矢状劈开下颌支截骨术中的力学行为评价。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Dec;26(4):633-639. doi: 10.1007/s10006-022-01038-1. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
4
On the Use of a Continuum Manipulator and a Bendable Medical Screw for Minimally Invasive Interventions in Orthopedic Surgery.连续体机器人和可弯曲医用螺钉在骨科手术微创干预中的应用
IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics. 2019 Feb;1(1):14-21. doi: 10.1109/tmrb.2019.2895780. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
5
Inroads Toward Robot-Assisted Internal Fixation of Bone Fractures Using a Bendable Medical Screw and the Curved Drilling Technique.使用可弯曲医用螺钉和弯曲钻孔技术实现机器人辅助骨折内固定的进展。
Proc IEEE RAS EMBS Int Conf Biomed Robot Biomechatron. 2018 Aug;2018:595-600. doi: 10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8487926. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
6
Analysis of Mandibular Test Specimens Used to Assess a Bone Fixation System.用于评估骨固定系统的下颌骨测试样本分析
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2015 Sep;8(3):171-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393732. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
7
TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.TMJ 对下颌前伸手术的反应:风险因素概述。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Jan-Feb;22(1):2-14. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130056.
8
Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of three stable internal fixation techniques used in sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: a study in sheep mandibles.生物力学体外评估三种用于下颌支矢状劈开截骨术的稳定内固定技术:绵羊下颌骨研究。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Jul-Aug;20(4):419-26. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000400006.