Suppr超能文献

大黄的问题:亚里士多德科学理论中的经验调适

Problems with Rhubarb: Accommodating Experience in Aristotelian Theories of Science.

作者信息

Hessbrüggen-Walter Stefan

出版信息

Early Sci Med. 2014;19(4):317-40. doi: 10.1163/15733823-00194p02.

Abstract

The paper examines controversies over the role of experience in the constitution of scientific knowledge in early modern Aristotelianism. While for Jacopo Zabarella, experience helps to confirm the results of demonstrative science, the Bologna Dominican Chrysostomo Javelli assumes that it also contributes to the discovery of new truths in what he calls 'beginning science'. Both thinkers use medical plants as a philosophical example. Javelli analyses the proposition 'rhubarb purges bile' as the conclusion of a yet unknown scientific proof. Zabarella uses instead hellebore, a plant that is found all over Europe, and defends the view that propositions about purgative powers of plants are based on their 'identity of substance', an identity that had become questionable with regard to rhubarb due to new empirical findings in the sixteenth century.

摘要

本文探讨了近代早期亚里士多德主义中关于经验在科学知识构成中的作用的争议。对于雅各布·扎巴雷拉而言,经验有助于确证证明性科学的结果,而博洛尼亚多明我会的克里斯托斯托莫·贾韦利则认为,经验在他所谓的“初始科学”中也有助于发现新的真理。两位思想家都将药用植物用作哲学例证。贾韦利将“大黄能泻胆汁”这一命题分析为一个尚未知晓的科学证明的结论。相反,扎巴雷拉使用了在欧洲各地都能找到的嚏根草,并捍卫了这样一种观点,即关于植物泻下能力的命题是基于它们的“物质同一性”,而由于16世纪的新经验发现,这种同一性在大黄的问题上已变得可疑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验