Suppr超能文献

非工作时间的初级医疗保健:一项基于人群的电话问诊诊断范围研究。

Out-of-hours primary care: a population-based study of the diagnostic scope of telephone contacts.

作者信息

Moth Grete, Huibers Linda, Christensen Morten Bondo, Vedsted Peter

机构信息

The Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2016 Oct;33(5):504-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw048. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

GPs answer all patient calls to the out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) services in Denmark. Knowledge is scarce on how the triage-GPs act on the specific reasons for encounter (RFE).

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe the RFEs, the applied diagnoses and the severity of health problems presented in calls to the OOH-PC.

METHODS

This was a 1-year cross-sectional study based on IT-integrated pop-up questionnaires addressing patients' health problems. We included only telephone contacts that were categorized according to their triage outcome as telephone consultations, direct admissions to hospital or referrals for face-to-face contact. The GP-assessed severity was calculated for age groups and types of outcome. We identified the 20 most frequent primary RFEs and diagnoses for each type of contact termination.

RESULTS

We included 7810 telephone calls. Calls considered non-severe made up two-thirds of the calls terminated as telephone consultations, whereas calls considered potentially severe made up the main part of referrals (52.3%). Overall, the 20 most frequent RFEs accounted for 45.2% of all RFEs, fever being the most frequent (10.0%). Some RFEs were terminated mostly as telephone consultations [e.g. insect bite/sting (75.9%)], whereas others were most often referred for a face-to-face contact [i.e. dyspnoea (79.1%)] or directly to hospital [i.e. chest pain (29.4%)].

CONCLUSION

The distribution of the RFEs on triage outcomes, dominated by more severe diagnoses in referrals indicates a suitable referral level. However, future research on factors related to the demanding task of telephone triage is highly relevant for postdoctoral training of GPs.

摘要

背景

在丹麦,全科医生接听所有患者拨打的非工作时间初级医疗服务(OOH - PC)电话。关于分诊全科医生如何根据具体就诊原因(RFE)采取行动的知识很少。

目的

本研究旨在描述拨打OOH - PC电话时呈现的就诊原因、应用的诊断以及健康问题的严重程度。

方法

这是一项为期1年的横断面研究,基于信息技术集成的弹出式问卷来询问患者的健康问题。我们仅纳入了根据分诊结果分类为电话咨询、直接住院或转介进行面对面接触的电话联系。计算了不同年龄组和结局类型的全科医生评估的严重程度。我们确定了每种接触终止类型中最常见的20种主要就诊原因和诊断。

结果

我们纳入了7810个电话。被认为不严重的电话占以电话咨询终止的电话的三分之二,而被认为可能严重的电话构成了转介的主要部分(52.3%)。总体而言,最常见的20种就诊原因占所有就诊原因的45.2%,发热是最常见的(10.0%)。一些就诊原因大多以电话咨询终止[例如昆虫叮咬/蜇伤(75.9%)],而其他原因最常被转介进行面对面接触[即呼吸困难(79.1%)]或直接住院[即胸痛(29.4%)]。

结论

就诊原因在分诊结果上的分布,以转介中更严重的诊断为主,表明了合适的转介水平。然而,未来关于与电话分诊这一艰巨任务相关因素的研究对于全科医生的博士后培训具有高度相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验