J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jul;22(7):826-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.826.
The Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FDAMA) of 1997 included Section 114 as a regulatory safe harbor with the goal of increasing the dissemination of health care economic information (HCEI) to those responsible for formulary decision making. HCEI is typically not included within FDA-approved labeling. Although it has been nearly 20 years since passage and enactment of Section 114, proactive distribution of HCEI has been underutilized by biopharmaceutical companies partly because of (a) vague wording in the statute and (b) the absence of FDA-implementing regulations. Consequently, companies and health care decisions makers have had to speculate about the scope of the provisions. As a result, the biopharmaceutical industry has significant concerns about stepping over the line when using the safe harbor. Also, payers and other "payer-like" decision makers (e.g., self-funded corporate insurers) who are trying to make appropriate coverage and utilization decisions are demanding this information but are not receiving it because of the uncertainties in the statute. Considering this renewed interest by multiple stakeholders regarding the need for revisions and/or guidance pertaining to Section 114, the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy held a partnership forum on March 1-2, 2016, with a diverse group of health care stakeholders to provide the FDA with considerations for disseminating a guidance document on current thinking for the sharing of HCEI with health care decision makers. Forum participants represented the managed care industry, biopharmaceutical industry, health care providers, pharmacoeconomic experts, policy experts, and patient advocacy groups with specific expertise in the development, use, and dissemination of HCEI. The multistakeholder group represented the key professionals and entities affected by the provisions of Section 114 and present the collective credibility necessary for Congress and the FDA to modernize and operationalize the safe harbor by using the consensus recommendations developed during the forum. Speakers, panelists, and attendees focused on 4 terms in Section 114 that remain open to interpretation by companies and enforcement bodies: (1) the scope of HCEI, (2) the scope of "formulary committee or similar entity," (3) the definition of "competent and reliable scientific evidence (CRSE)," and (4) the parameters of how information "directly relates to an approved indication." Based on the forum results, it was recommended that the safe harbor for companies' proactive dissemination of information under Section 114 should include health care decision makers beyond health plan formulary committees, including organizations, or individuals in their role in an organization, who make health care decisions for patient populations. Recommendations also suggested expansion to organizations that evaluate HCEI or develop value frameworks and compendia and individuals in such organizations. Forum participants also recommended that HCEI be truthful, and not misleading, and be based on the expertise of professionals in the relevant area. HCEI must also be developed and disclosed in a transparent, reproducible, and accurate manner. Forum participants also discussed and agreed on the types of information, format, and processes by which managed care pharmacy and other health care decision makers seek to receive HCEI from biopharmaceutical companies. Finally, participants encouraged the FDA, Congress, and other stakeholders to find ways to ensure that patients or their representative organizations have appropriate access to a full range of information about their medications and that information related to the medication pipeline is communicated to appropriate stakeholders in a timely manner.
The AMCP Partnership Forum on FDAMA Section 114-Improving the Exchange of Pharmacoeconomic Data and the development of this proceedings document were supported by AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., National Pharmaceutical Council, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Precision for Value, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, U.S.A., and Xcenda. All sponsors participated in the forum and participated in revising and approving the manuscript.
食品和药物管理局现代化法案(FDAMA)于 1997 年纳入第 114 条作为监管安全港,目标是增加向负责处方决策的人员传播医疗保健经济信息(HCEI)。HCEI 通常不包含在 FDA 批准的标签中。尽管自第 114 条通过和颁布以来已经过去了近 20 年,但生物制药公司对 HCEI 的积极分发利用不足,部分原因是(a)法规措辞模糊,(b)FDA 实施法规的缺失。因此,公司和医疗保健决策者不得不猜测这些规定的范围。结果,生物制药行业在使用安全港时对越过界限有重大担忧。此外,试图做出适当的覆盖范围和使用决策的支付者和其他“类似支付者”的决策者(例如,自付公司保险公司)也在要求提供这些信息,但由于法规中的不确定性,他们没有收到这些信息。考虑到多个利益相关者对修订和/或与第 114 条相关的指导的需求,管理式医疗药房协会于 2016 年 3 月 1 日至 2 日举行了一次合作伙伴论坛,邀请了多元化的医疗保健利益相关者,向 FDA 提供关于传播与医疗保健决策者共享 HCEI 的当前思维的指导文件的考虑因素。论坛参与者代表了管理式医疗行业、生物制药行业、医疗保健提供者、药经济学专家、政策专家以及在 HCEI 的开发、使用和传播方面具有特定专业知识的患者权益团体。多利益相关方团体代表了受第 114 条规定影响的关键专业人员和实体,并为国会和 FDA 提供了集体信誉,使安全港现代化并使之发挥作用,方法是利用论坛期间制定的共识建议。演讲者、专题讨论小组成员和与会者重点关注了公司和执法机构仍可对第 114 条中的 4 个术语进行解释的条款:(1)HCEI 的范围,(2)“处方委员会或类似实体”的范围,(3)“合格和可靠科学证据(CRSE)”的定义,以及(4)信息“直接与批准的适应症相关”的参数。根据论坛的结果,建议将第 114 条下公司积极传播信息的安全港应包括健康计划处方委员会以外的医疗保健决策者,包括在组织中或在其组织中的角色中为患者群体做出医疗保健决策的组织或个人。建议还包括评估 HCEI 或制定价值框架和纲要的组织以及此类组织中的个人。论坛参与者还建议 HCEI 必须真实,不具有误导性,并基于相关领域专业人员的专业知识。HCEI 还必须以透明、可重复和准确的方式进行开发和披露。论坛参与者还讨论并同意管理式药房和其他医疗保健决策者希望从生物制药公司获得的 HCEI 的信息类型、格式和流程。最后,参与者鼓励 FDA、国会和其他利益相关者寻找方法,确保患者或其代表组织能够获得其药物的所有相关信息,并及时将与药物管道相关的信息传达给适当的利益相关者。
AbbVie、Amgen、Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals、Merck & Co.、National Pharmaceutical Council、Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America、Precision for Value、Pfizer、Takeda Pharmaceuticals、U.S.A. 和 Xcenda 支持 AMCP 合作伙伴论坛关于 FDAMA 第 114 条的会议-改善药物经济学数据的交流以及本会议文件的编写。所有赞助商都参加了论坛,并参与了修订和批准手稿。