• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
AMCP Partnership Forum: Improving Quality, Value, and Outcomes with Patient-Reported Outcomes.AMCP 合作论坛:利用患者报告的结局改善质量、价值和结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Mar;24(3):304-310. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.17491. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
2
AMCP Partnership Forum: Building the Foundation for Patient-Reported Outcomes-Infrastructure and Methodologies.AMCP合作论坛:构建患者报告结局的基础设施与方法基础
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Apr;25(4):501-506. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19034. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
AMCP Partnership Forum: Advancing Value-Based Contracting.AMCP 合作论坛:推进基于价值的合同。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Nov;23(11):1096-1102. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.17342. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
4
AMCP Partnership Forum: FDAMA Section 114-Improving the Exchange of Health Care Economic Data.AMCP 合作论坛:FDAMA 第 114 节——改善医疗保健经济数据的交流。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jul;22(7):826-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.826.
5
AMCP Partnership Forum: Managing Care in the Wave of Precision Medicine.AMCP 合作论坛:在精准医疗浪潮中管理医疗服务。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):583-588. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.583.
6
AMCP Partnership Forum: Integrated Delivery Networks' Role in Pharmaceutical Value-Based Agreements.AMCP 合作论坛:整合交付网络在药品价值型协议中的作用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 May;25(5):526-531. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.5.526.
7
AMCP Partnership Forum: Enabling the Exchange of Clinical and Economic Information Pre-FDA Approval.AMCP 合作论坛:在 FDA 批准前实现临床和经济信息的交流。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):105-112. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.16366. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
8
AMCP Partnership Forum: Designing Benefits and Payment Models for Innovative High-Investment Medications.AMCP 合作论坛:为创新性高投入药物设计获益和支付模式。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Feb;25(2):156-162. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.2.156.
9
AMCP Partnership Forum: Digital Therapeutics-What Are They and Where Do They Fit in Pharmacy and Medical Benefits?AMCP 合作论坛:数字疗法——它们是什么,以及它们在药学和医疗福利中的定位是什么?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 May;26(5):674-681. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.19418. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
10
AMCP Partnership Forum: Driving Value and Outcomes in Oncology.AMCP 合作论坛:推动肿瘤学的价值和成果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 May;23(5):591-597. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.5.591.

引用本文的文献

1
Negotiating pricing and payment terms for insurance covered mHealth apps: a qualitative content analysis and taxonomy development based on a German experience.协商保险覆盖的移动健康应用程序的定价和支付条款:基于德国经验的定性内容分析和分类法开发
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Oct 4;14(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00558-8.
2
Evaluating patient-reported adherence and outcomes in specialty disease states: A dual-site initiative.评估专科疾病患者报告的依从性和结局:一项双站点计划。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Jul;30(7):710-718. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.710.
3
Limited role of patient input in specialty drug coverage policies.患者意见在专科药物保险政策中作用有限。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Aug;27(8):1067-1076. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.8.1067.
4
Health-Related Quality of Life as Measured by the 12-Item Short-Form Survey Among Adults With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia who Received Either Lefamulin or Moxifloxacin in 2 Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Clinical Trials.在两项III期随机、双盲、双模拟临床试验中,接受来法莫林或莫西沙星治疗的社区获得性细菌性肺炎成人患者,通过12项简明调查量表测量的健康相关生活质量。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 3;7(6):ofaa209. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa209. eCollection 2020 Jun.
5
Outcome measures for oncology alternative payment models: practical considerations and recommendations.肿瘤学替代支付模式的结果指标:实际考量与建议
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Dec 1;25(12):e403-e409.
6
An electronic patient-reported outcomes measurement system in paediatric orthopaedics.小儿骨科中的电子患者报告结局测量系统。
J Child Orthop. 2019 Aug 1;13(4):431-437. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.13.190053.
7
Stakeholder-Guided Formation of a Statewide Community Pharmacy Practice-Based Research Network.利益相关者引导下的全州社区药房实践研究网络的组建。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Aug 17;7(3):118. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030118.
8
AMCP Partnership Forum: Building the Foundation for Patient-Reported Outcomes-Infrastructure and Methodologies.AMCP合作论坛:构建患者报告结局的基础设施与方法基础
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Apr;25(4):501-506. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19034. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
How to Measure Population Health: An Exploration Toward an Integration of Valid and Reliable Instruments.如何衡量人群健康:探索有效且可靠工具的整合
Popul Health Manag. 2018 Aug;21(4):323-330. doi: 10.1089/pop.2017.0097. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
2
Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Health Care To Engage Patients And Enhance Care.将患者报告的结果纳入医疗保健,以促使患者参与并改善护理。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):575-82. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1362.
3
Methods for Developing Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Performance Measures (PRO-PMs).基于患者报告结局的绩效指标(PRO-PMs)的开发方法。
Value Health. 2015 Jun;18(4):493-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 May 21.
4
Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).患者报告结局(PROs)和患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)。
Health Serv Insights. 2013 Aug 4;6:61-8. doi: 10.4137/HSI.S11093. eCollection 2013.
5
The role of worksite health screening: a policy statement from the American Heart Association.工作场所健康筛查的作用:美国心脏协会的政策声明。
Circulation. 2014 Aug 19;130(8):719-34. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000079. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
6
Toward patient-centered drug development in oncology.迈向肿瘤学中以患者为中心的药物研发。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 1;369(5):397-400. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1114649. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
7
Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: perspectives from a PROMIS meeting.患者报告结局测量的内容效度:来自 PROMIS 会议的观点。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Jun;21(5):739-46. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9990-8. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
8
The values and value of patient-centered care.以患者为中心的护理的价值观与价值
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):100-3. doi: 10.1370/afm.1239.
9
A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups.EQ-5D与SF-6D在七个患者群体中的比较。
Health Econ. 2004 Sep;13(9):873-84. doi: 10.1002/hec.866.

AMCP 合作论坛:利用患者报告的结局改善质量、价值和结果。

AMCP Partnership Forum: Improving Quality, Value, and Outcomes with Patient-Reported Outcomes.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Mar;24(3):304-310. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.17491. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2018.17491
PMID:29460679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10398250/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), which provide a direct measure of a patient's health status or treatment preferences, represent a key component of the shift toward patient-centered health care. PROs can measure the state of a patient's disease-specific and overall health throughout the care continuum, enabling them to have a variety of uses for key health care stakeholders. Currently, PROs are used in drug development, aligning patient and clinician goals in care, quality-of-care measures, and coverage and reimbursement decisions. While there have been significant strides by key health care stakeholders to further the development and use of PROs, there are a number of challenges limiting more widespread use. In light of these current challenges and the potential for PROs to improve health care quality and value, on October 19, 2017, the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy convened a forum of key stakeholders representing patients, payers, providers, government, and pharmaceutical companies to discuss and identify solutions to the current challenges and barriers to further use of PROs. These discussions informed the development of participants' ideal future state in which PROs maximize the goals of all health care stakeholders and the actionable steps required to make the future state a reality. While stakeholders shared unique perspectives throughout the forum, they had consensus on 2 overarching issues: the importance of PROs in defining value, improving patient care, and implementing value-based payment models and the need for strong organizational and operational systems to achieve optimal adoption and use. Participants identified several key challenges in PRO use and adoption: achieving a representative patient population, inclusion of PRO data in medication labels, the necessity for both standardized and customizable PROs, and operational and organizational barriers to collecting and analyzing PROs. To overcome these challenges, participants recommended that manufacturers should engage key stakeholders early and throughout the drug development process to ensure the most valid and representative PROs and patient populations will be included. To streamline the PRO collection process, participants suggested engaging pharmacists and other providers who may have more frequent interaction with patients. Participants also recommended that PRO collection and analysis should use common technology platforms, streamline components of clinician care to reduce workflow, and be integrated with claims data to provider payers a better understanding of patient health in real time. Finally, additional work should be done to develop patient-reported outcome measures that contain relevant measures for all healthcare stakeholders. While significant challenges remain in PRO development and adoption, participants agreed that greater use can only be achieved through collaboration and patient-centered care.

DISCLOSURES

The AMCP Partnership Forum titled "Improving Quality, Value, and Outcomes with Patient-Reported Outcomes" and the development of this proceedings report were supported by Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Precision for Value, Premier, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, and Xcenda.

摘要

无标题:

患者报告的结果(PROs)直接衡量患者的健康状况或治疗偏好,是向以患者为中心的医疗保健转变的关键组成部分。PROs 可以在整个护理连续体中衡量患者特定疾病和整体健康状况,使它们能够为主要医疗保健利益相关者的各种用途提供服务。目前,PROs 用于药物开发,在护理中使患者和临床医生的目标保持一致,用于护理质量措施以及覆盖范围和报销决策。尽管主要医疗保健利益相关者在进一步开发和使用 PROs 方面取得了重大进展,但仍存在许多限制其更广泛使用的挑战。鉴于当前的挑战和 PROs 改善医疗保健质量和价值的潜力,2017 年 10 月 19 日,管理式医疗药剂师协会召集了一个由代表患者、支付方、提供者、政府和制药公司的主要利益相关者参加的论坛,以讨论和确定进一步使用 PROs 的当前挑战和障碍的解决方案。这些讨论为参与者制定了理想的未来状态,即 PROs 最大化所有医疗保健利益相关者的目标,并制定了实现未来状态所需的可操作步骤。虽然利益相关者在整个论坛上分享了独特的观点,但他们在两个总体问题上达成了共识:PROs 在定义价值、改善患者护理和实施基于价值的支付模式方面的重要性,以及实现最佳采用和使用所需的强大组织和运营系统。参与者确定了 PRO 使用和采用方面的几个关键挑战:实现有代表性的患者群体,将 PRO 数据纳入药物标签,标准化和定制 PRO 的必要性,以及收集和分析 PRO 的运营和组织障碍。为了克服这些挑战,参与者建议制造商应在药物开发过程中尽早并与主要利益相关者接触,以确保纳入最有效和最具代表性的 PROs 和患者群体。为了简化 PRO 收集过程,参与者建议让药剂师和其他可能与患者有更频繁互动的提供者参与进来。参与者还建议,PRO 的收集和分析应使用通用的技术平台,简化临床医生护理的组件以减少工作流程,并与理赔数据集成,以便支付方实时更好地了解患者的健康状况。最后,应开展更多工作来开发包含所有医疗保健利益相关者相关措施的患者报告结果衡量指标。尽管 PRO 的开发和采用仍然存在重大挑战,但参与者一致认为,只有通过协作和以患者为中心的护理,才能实现更广泛的使用。

披露:

名为“通过患者报告的结果改善质量、价值和结果”的 AMCP 合作伙伴论坛以及本报告的编写得到了安进、勃林格殷格翰制药公司、基因泰克、葛兰素史克、诺华制药公司、诺和诺德、精准价值、顶峰、赛诺菲、武田制药美国公司和 Xcenda 的支持。