Meijer G A, Westerterp K R, Koper H, ten Hoor F
Department of Human Biology, University of Limburg, The Netherlands.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989 Jun;21(3):343-7.
The feasibility of a portable accelerometer equipped with a three-directional sensor for the assessment of physical activity and the consequences for energy expenditure was examined under laboratory conditions and during normal daily life. Heart rate monitoring was also conducted to allow comparison of both techniques. In the laboratory study 16 healthy subjects performed a number of specified exercises within a range of activity levels that may be expected in normal life. Accelerometer output was compared with energy expenditure measured by continuous respirometry. A linear relationship was found between accelerometer output and energy expenditure for the pooled data. The standard error of estimate is 79.1 J.min-1.kg-1. In the field study four subjects were observed during a week under free living conditions. Energy expenditure was calculated from food intake registered over the whole period. Energy expenditure calculated from accelerometer output and heart rate exceeded the energy intake figures by 30% and 33%, respectively. Possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed. Despite this discrepancy, accelerometer output appeared to correlate highly with energy intake (r = 0.99, P less than 0.025), which suggests accurate performance of the accelerometer under free living conditions. The heart rate method gave much poorer results in estimating individual energy expenditure.
在实验室条件和正常日常生活中,研究了配备三向传感器的便携式加速度计用于评估身体活动的可行性及其对能量消耗的影响。还进行了心率监测,以便对这两种技术进行比较。在实验室研究中,16名健康受试者在正常生活中可能出现的一系列活动水平范围内进行了一些特定的运动。将加速度计输出与通过连续呼吸测定法测量的能量消耗进行比较。对于汇总数据,发现加速度计输出与能量消耗之间存在线性关系。估计标准误差为79.1 J·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹。在现场研究中,在自由生活条件下对4名受试者进行了为期一周的观察。根据整个期间记录的食物摄入量计算能量消耗。根据加速度计输出和心率计算的能量消耗分别比能量摄入数字高出30%和33%。讨论了这种差异的可能解释。尽管存在这种差异,但加速度计输出似乎与能量摄入高度相关(r = 0.99,P < 0.025),这表明加速度计在自由生活条件下表现准确。心率法在估计个体能量消耗方面的结果要差得多。