Turlure Camille, Schtickzelle Nicolas, Van Dyck Hans, Seymoure Brett, Rutowski Ronald
Université catholique de Louvain, Biodiversity Research Centre, Earth and Life Institute, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0158073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158073. eCollection 2016.
Understanding dispersal is of prime importance in conservation and population biology. Individual traits related to motion and navigation during dispersal may differ: (1) among species differing in habitat distribution, which in turn, may lead to interspecific differences in the potential for and costs of dispersal, (2) among populations of a species that experiences different levels of habitat fragmentation; (3) among individuals differing in their dispersal strategy and (4) between the sexes due to sexual differences in behaviour and dispersal tendencies. In butterflies, the visual system plays a central role in dispersal, but exactly how the visual system is related to dispersal has received far less attention than flight morphology. We studied two butterfly species to explore the relationships between flight and eye morphology, and dispersal. We predicted interspecific, intraspecific and intersexual differences for both flight and eye morphology relative to i) species-specific habitat distribution, ii) variation in dispersal strategy within each species and iii) behavioural differences between sexes. However, we did not investigate for potential population differences. We found: (1) sexual differences that presumably reflect different demands on both male and female visual and flight systems, (2) a higher wing loading (i.e. a proxy for flight performance), larger eyes and larger facet sizes in the frontal and lateral region of the eye (i.e. better navigation capacities) in the species inhabiting naturally fragmented habitat compared to the species inhabiting rather continuous habitat, and (3) larger facets in the frontal region in dispersers compared to residents within a species. Hence, dispersers may have similar locomotory capacity but potentially better navigation capacity. Dispersal ecology and evolution have attracted much attention, but there are still significant gaps in our understanding of the mechanisms of dispersal. Unfortunately, for many species we lack detailed information on the role of behavioural, morphological and physiological traits for dispersal. Our novel study supports the existence of inter- and intra-specific evolutionary responses in both motion and navigation capacities (i.e. flight and eye morphology) linked to dispersal.
了解扩散在保护生物学和种群生物学中至关重要。与扩散过程中的运动和导航相关的个体特征可能存在差异:(1) 在栖息地分布不同的物种之间,这进而可能导致扩散潜力和成本的种间差异;(2) 在经历不同程度栖息地破碎化的物种的种群之间;(3) 在扩散策略不同的个体之间;以及(4) 由于行为和扩散倾向的性别差异而在两性之间存在差异。在蝴蝶中,视觉系统在扩散中起核心作用,但视觉系统与扩散的确切关系受到的关注远少于飞行形态学。我们研究了两种蝴蝶物种,以探索飞行与眼睛形态以及扩散之间的关系。我们预测了相对于以下方面的飞行和眼睛形态的种间、种内和两性差异:i) 物种特定的栖息地分布;ii) 每个物种内扩散策略的变化;以及iii) 两性之间的行为差异。然而,我们没有研究潜在的种群差异。我们发现:(1) 性别差异可能反映了对雄性和雌性视觉和飞行系统的不同需求;(2) 与栖息在相当连续栖息地的物种相比,栖息在自然破碎化栖息地的物种具有更高的翼载荷(即飞行性能的一个指标)、更大的眼睛以及眼睛正面和侧面区域更大的小眼面尺寸(即更好的导航能力);以及(3) 与同一物种内的留居个体相比,扩散个体的正面区域小眼面更大。因此,扩散个体可能具有相似的运动能力,但潜在的导航能力更强。扩散生态学和进化已引起广泛关注,但我们对扩散机制的理解仍存在重大差距。不幸的是,对于许多物种,我们缺乏关于行为、形态和生理特征在扩散中作用的详细信息。我们的新研究支持在与扩散相关的运动和导航能力(即飞行和眼睛形态)方面存在种间和种内进化反应。