Fraunhofer IME-AE , Auf dem Aberg 1, 57392 Schmallenberg, Germany.
ECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH , Böttgerstrasse 2-14, 65439 Flörsheim am Main, Germany.
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jul 5;50(13):6856-64. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01095. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
Studies according to OECD 308 and OECD 309 are performed to simulate the biodegradation of chemicals in water-sediment systems in support of persistence assessment and exposure modeling. However, several shortcomings of OECD 308 have been identified that hamper data evaluation and interpretation, and its relation to OECD 309 is still unclear. The present study systematically compares OECD 308 and OECD 309 and two variants thereof to derive recommendations on how to experimentally address any shortcomings and improve data for persistence and risk assessment. To this end, four (14)C-labeled compounds with different biodegradation and sorption behavior were tested across standard OECD 308 and 309 test systems and two modified versions thereof. The well-degradable compounds showed slow equilibration and the least mineralization in OECD 308, whereas the modified systems provided the highest degree of mineralization. Different lines of evidence suggest that this was due to increased oxygenation of the sediment in the modified systems. Particularly for rapidly degrading compounds, non-extractable residue formation was in line with degradation and did not follow the sediment-water ratio. For the two more slowly degrading compounds, sorption in OECD 309 (standard and modified) increased with time beyond levels proposed by equilibrium partitioning, which could be attributed to the grinding of the sediment through the stirring of the sediment suspension. Overall, the large differences in degradation observed across the four test systems suggest that refined specifications in test guidelines are required to reduce variability in test outcomes. At the same time, the amount of sediment and its degree of oxygenation emerged as drivers across all test systems. This suggests that a unified description of the systems was possible and would pave the way toward a more consistent consideration of degradation in the water-sediment systems across different exposure situations and regulatory frameworks.
根据 OECD308 和 OECD309 进行的研究旨在模拟水-沉积物系统中化学物质的生物降解,以支持持久性评估和暴露建模。然而,已经确定 OECD308 存在一些缺点,这些缺点阻碍了数据评估和解释,并且其与 OECD309 的关系仍不清楚。本研究系统地比较了 OECD308 和 OECD309 及其两种变体,以就如何通过实验解决任何缺点并为持久性和风险评估改进数据提出建议。为此,测试了四种(14)C 标记的化合物,这些化合物具有不同的生物降解和吸附行为,横跨标准 OECD308 和 309 测试系统及其两种变体。在 OECD308 中,可降解性好的化合物表现出缓慢的平衡和最小的矿化,而改良系统则提供了最高的矿化程度。不同的证据表明,这是由于改良系统中沉积物的氧化程度增加所致。特别是对于快速降解的化合物,不可提取残留物的形成与降解一致,并且不遵循沉积物-水比。对于两种降解速度较慢的化合物,OECD309(标准和改良)中的吸附随时间增加而超过平衡分配所建议的水平,这可以归因于通过搅拌沉积物悬浮液对沉积物进行研磨。总的来说,四个测试系统中观察到的降解差异很大,这表明需要在测试指南中进行更精细的规范,以减少测试结果的变异性。同时,所有测试系统中,沉积物的数量及其氧化程度都是驱动因素。这表明可以对系统进行统一描述,并为在不同暴露情况和监管框架下更一致地考虑水-沉积物系统中的降解铺平道路。