Whale Environmental Consultancy Ltd., Chester, UK.
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Nov;17(6):1123-1135. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4438. Epub 2021 May 25.
Significant progress has been made in the scientific understanding of factors that influence the outcome of biodegradation tests used to assess the persistence (P) of chemicals. This needs to be evaluated to assess whether recently acquired knowledge could enhance existing regulations and environmental risk assessments. Biodegradation tests have limitations, which are accentuated for "difficult-to-test" substances, and failure to recognize these can potentially lead to inappropriate conclusions regarding a chemical's environmental persistence. Many of these limitations have been previously recognized and discussed in a series of ECETOC reports and workshops. These were subsequently used to develop a series of research projects designed to address key issues and, where possible, propose methods to mitigate the limitations of current assessments. Here, we report on the output of a Cefic LRI-Concawe Workshop held in Helsinki on September 27, 2018. The objectives of this workshop were to disseminate key findings from recent projects and assess how new scientific knowledge can potentially support and improve assessments under existing regulatory frameworks. The workshop provided a unique opportunity to initiate a process to reexamine the fundamentals of degradation and what current assessment methods can achieve by (1) providing an overview of the key elements and messages coming from recent research initiatives and (2) stimulating discussion regarding how these interrelate and how new findings can be developed to improve persistence assessments. Opportunities to try and improve understanding of factors affecting biodegradation assessments and better understanding of the persistence of chemicals (particularly UVCBs [substances of unknown or variable composition, complex reaction products, or biological materials]) were identified, and the workshop acted as a catalyst for further multistakeholder activities and engagements to take the persistence assessment of chemicals into the 21st century. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:1123-1135. © 2021 European Petroleum Refiners Association - Concawe Division. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
在影响用于评估化学物质持久性(P)的生物降解测试结果的因素的科学理解方面已经取得了重大进展。需要对其进行评估,以评估最近获得的知识是否可以增强现有的法规和环境风险评估。生物降解测试具有局限性,对于“难以测试”的物质,这些局限性更加突出,而未能认识到这些局限性可能会导致对化学物质环境持久性的不适当结论。这些局限性中的许多局限性在之前的一系列 ECETOC 报告和研讨会上已经得到了认识和讨论。随后,这些报告和研讨会被用来开展一系列研究项目,旨在解决关键问题,并在可能的情况下提出缓解当前评估局限性的方法。在这里,我们报告了 2018 年 9 月 27 日在赫尔辛基举行的 Cefic LRI-Concawe 研讨会的成果。本次研讨会的目的是传播最近项目的主要发现,并评估新的科学知识如何在现有监管框架下潜在地支持和改进评估。本次研讨会提供了一个独特的机会,可以重新审视降解的基本原理以及当前评估方法可以实现的目标,方法是:(1)概述最近研究计划的关键要素和信息;(2)激发关于这些要素如何相互关联以及如何利用新发现来改进持久性评估的讨论。本次研讨会确定了改善对影响生物降解评估的因素的理解以及更好地了解化学物质持久性(特别是 UVCBs[未知或可变组成、复杂反应产物或生物材料])的机会,并充当了催化剂,推动了进一步的多方利益攸关者活动和参与,将化学物质的持久性评估带入 21 世纪。综合环境评估与管理 2021;17:1123-1135。©2021 欧洲石油炼制商协会 - Concawe 分部。综合环境评估与管理由 Wiley Periodicals LLC 代表环境毒理与化学学会(SETAC)出版。