• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术后疼痛评分降低以及麻醉药物使用减少表明,经口内镜下肌切开术优于腹腔镜下Heller肌切开术。

Reduced postoperative pain scores and narcotic use favor per-oral endoscopic myotomy over laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

作者信息

Docimo Salvatore, Mathew Abraham, Shope Alexander J, Winder Joshua S, Haluck Randy S, Pauli Eric M

机构信息

Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, H149, Hershey, PA, 17036, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):795-800. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5034-3. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-016-5034-3
PMID:27338580
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a less invasive therapy for achalasia with a shorter hospitalization but with similar short- and long-term outcomes as a laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). Previous literature comparing POEM to LHM has focused primarily on postoperative outcome parameters such as complications, dysphagia scores and gastro-esophageal reflux severity. This study specifically compares postoperative pain following POEM to pain following LHM, the current gold-standard operation.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing POEM or LHM for achalasia was performed from 2006 to 2015. Data collection included demographics, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS) and pain scores (arrival to the recovery room, 1 h postoperative, average first 24 h and upon discharge). Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test and Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Forty-four POEM patients and 122 LHM patients were identified. The average age (52.2 ± 20.75 vs 50.9 ± 17.89 years, p = 0.306) and BMI (28.1 ± 7.62 vs 27.6 ± 7.07 kg/m, p = 0.824) did not differ between the POEM and LHM groups, respectively; however, the American Society of Anesthesiology scores were higher in the POEM patients (2.43 ± 0.62 vs 2.11 ± 0.71, p = 0.011). There were no differences in rates of smoking, diabetes, cardiac disease or pulmonary disease. The average pain scores upon arrival to the recovery room and 1 h postoperatively were lower in the POEM group (2.3 ± 3.014 vs 3.61 ± 3 0.418, p = 0.025 and 2.2 ± 2.579 vs 3.46 ± 3.063, p = 0.034, respectively). There was no difference in the average pain score over the first 24 h (2.7 ± 2.067 vs 3.29 ± 1.980, p = 0.472) or at the time of discharge (1.6 ± 2.420 vs 2.09 ± 2.157, p = 0.0657) between the POEM and LHM groups. After standardizing opioid administration against 10 mg of oral morphine, the POEM group used significantly less narcotics that the LHM group (35.8 vs 101.8 mg, p < 0.001) while hospitalized. The average LOS for the POEM group was 31.2 h and 55.79 for the LHM group (p < 0.0001). At discharge, fewer POEM patients required a prescription for a narcotic analgesic (6.81 vs 92.4 %, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

POEM demonstrated significantly less postoperative pain upon arrival to the recovery room and 1 h postoperatively. To achieve similar pain scores during the first 24 h and at discharge, LHM patients required more narcotic analgesic administration. Despite a significantly shorter LOS, fewer POEM patients require a prescription for narcotic analgesics compared to LHM. POEM is a less painful procedure for achalasia than LHM, permitting earlier hospital discharge with little need for home narcotic use.

摘要

引言

经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)是一种治疗贲门失弛缓症的侵入性较小的疗法,住院时间较短,但短期和长期疗效与腹腔镜Heller肌切开术(LHM)相似。以往比较POEM与LHM的文献主要关注术后结局参数,如并发症、吞咽困难评分和胃食管反流严重程度。本研究专门比较了POEM术后疼痛与LHM术后疼痛,LHM是目前的金标准手术。

方法

对2006年至2015年期间所有接受POEM或LHM治疗贲门失弛缓症的患者进行回顾性研究。数据收集包括人口统计学、合并症、住院时间(LOS)和疼痛评分(到达恢复室时、术后1小时、术后头24小时平均评分及出院时评分)。采用Student's t检验和卡方检验进行统计分析。

结果

确定了44例接受POEM治疗的患者和122例接受LHM治疗的患者。POEM组和LHM组的平均年龄(分别为52.2±20.75岁和50.9±17.89岁,p = 0.306)和BMI(分别为28.1±7.62 kg/m和27.6±7.07 kg/m,p = 0.824)无差异;然而,POEM组患者的美国麻醉医师协会评分更高(2.43±0.62 vs 2.11±0.71,p = 0.011)。吸烟、糖尿病、心脏病或肺病的发生率无差异。POEM组到达恢复室时和术后1小时的平均疼痛评分较低(分别为2.3±3.014 vs 3.61±3.0418,p = 0.025和2.2±2.579 vs 3.46±3.063,p = 0.034)。POEM组和LHM组术后头24小时的平均疼痛评分(2.7±2.067 vs 3.29±1.980,p = 0.472)或出院时的平均疼痛评分(1.6±2.420 vs 2.09±2.157,p = 0.0657)无差异。在将阿片类药物用量按10 mg口服吗啡进行标准化后,POEM组住院期间使用的麻醉药品明显少于LHM组(35.8 vs 101.8 mg,p < 0.001)。POEM组的平均住院时间为31.2小时,LHM组为55.79小时(p < 0.0001)。出院时,需要开具麻醉性镇痛药处方的POEM患者较少(6.81% vs 92.4%,p < 0.0001)。

结论

POEM在到达恢复室时和术后1小时的术后疼痛明显较轻。为了在术后头24小时和出院时达到相似的疼痛评分,LHM患者需要更多的麻醉性镇痛药。尽管POEM组的住院时间明显较短,但与LHM组相比,需要开具麻醉性镇痛药处方的POEM患者较少。对于贲门失弛缓症,POEM比LHM的疼痛程度更低,允许更早出院,且几乎无需在家中使用麻醉药品。

相似文献

1
Reduced postoperative pain scores and narcotic use favor per-oral endoscopic myotomy over laparoscopic Heller myotomy.术后疼痛评分降低以及麻醉药物使用减少表明,经口内镜下肌切开术优于腹腔镜下Heller肌切开术。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):795-800. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5034-3. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
2
Comparison of early outcomes and quality of life after laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy to peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia.腹腔镜Heller贲门肌切开术与经口内镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的早期疗效及生活质量比较。
Dig Endosc. 2016 Jan;28(1):27-32. doi: 10.1111/den.12507. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
3
Clinical and financial outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy compared to laparoscopic heller myotomy for treatment of achalasia.经口内镜肌切开术与腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的临床和经济结局比较。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5526-5537. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09652-6. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
4
Outcome of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Treating Achalasia Compared With Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM).经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)与腹腔镜下Heller肌切开术(LHM)治疗贲门失弛缓症的疗效比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Feb;27(1):60-64. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000368.
5
Peroral endoscopic myotomy leads to higher rates of abnormal esophageal acid exposure than laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia.经口内镜肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症导致食管酸暴露异常的发生率高于腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2284-2292. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6522-4. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
6
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. Are results comparable to laparoscopic Heller myotomy?经口内镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症。其结果与腹腔镜Heller肌切开术相当吗?
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;50(5):505-12. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.934915. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
7
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) for Achalasia.经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)与腹腔镜下Heller肌切开术(LHM)治疗贲门失弛缓症围手术期结果的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Jun;27(3):123-131. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000402.
8
Surgical management of esophageal achalasia: Evolution of an institutional approach to minimally invasive repair.食管贲门失弛缓症的外科治疗:一种微创修复的机构性方法的演变
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Oct;51(10):1619-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 May 31.
9
Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs other achalasia treatments in improving esophageal function.经口内镜下肌切开术与其他贲门失弛缓症治疗方法在改善食管功能方面的疗效比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 May 28;22(20):4918-25. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4918.
10
Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy, Pneumatic Dilatation, and Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia.比较腹腔镜贲门肌切开术、气囊扩张术和经口内镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Feb;30(2):147-155. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0432. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Gastroesophageal reflux disease over time in endoscopic versus surgical myotomy for treatment of achalasia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜下与手术肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的胃食管反流病长期转归:系统评价与荟萃分析
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jun 17;13:a26215421. doi: 10.1055/a-2621-5421. eCollection 2025.
2
Esophageal Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (E-POEM): Future Directions and Perspectives.经口内镜下食管肌切开术(E-POEM):未来方向与展望。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2024 Oct;26(10):241-250. doi: 10.1007/s11894-024-00938-4. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
3
Achalasia: laparoscopic Heller myotomy with fundoplication versus peroral endoscopic myotomy-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)治疗贲门失弛缓症的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3030-46. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4040-6. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
2
Quality of life comparing dor and toupet after heller myotomy for achalasia.贲门失弛缓症行Heller肌切开术后Dor术式与Toupet术式的生活质量比较
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00191.
3
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) leads to similar results in patients with and without prior endoscopic or surgical therapy.
贲门失弛缓症:腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术联合胃底折叠术与经口内镜肌切开术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Esophagus. 2024 Jul;21(3):298-305. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01063-x. Epub 2024 May 22.
4
Gastroesophageal Reflux Waning Over Time in Endoscopic Versus Surgical Myotomy for the Treatment of Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜下与手术肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症中胃食管反流随时间的变化:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2022 Nov 21;14(11):e31756. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31756. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
High Eckardt score and previous treatment were associated with poor postperoral endoscopic myotomy pain control: A retrospective study.高埃卡德特评分和既往治疗与经口内镜下肌切开术后疼痛控制不佳相关:一项回顾性研究。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jun 16;10(17):5655-5666. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5655.
6
Paravertebral anesthetic nerve block for pain control after peroral endoscopic myotomy.经口内镜下肌切开术后用于疼痛控制的椎旁麻醉神经阻滞
Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;23(4):297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.tige.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
7
Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)后胃食管反流病(GERD)
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3308-3316. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08644-2. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
8
Esophageal POEM: the new standard of care.食管黏膜下隧道内镜切除术:新的治疗标准
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct 5;5:47. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2019.12.17. eCollection 2020.
9
How does per-oral endoscopic myotomy compare to Heller myotomy? The Latin American perspective.经口内镜下肌切开术与海勒肌切开术相比如何?拉丁美洲的观点。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Oct;8(10):E1392-E1397. doi: 10.1055/a-1223-1521. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
10
Updated Systematic Review of Achalasia, with a Focus on POEM Therapy.贲门失弛缓症的更新系统评价,重点介绍 POEM 疗法。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Jan;65(1):38-65. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05784-3. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)在接受过和未接受过内镜或手术治疗的患者中产生相似的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2015 May;29(5):1064-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3782-5. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
4
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia.经口内镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Jan;26(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12257. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
5
A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia.腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术与经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)治疗贲门失弛缓症的综合、客观结局比较研究。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jun;259(6):1098-103. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000268.
6
Achalasia: a review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes.贲门失弛缓症:临床诊断、流行病学、治疗和结局的综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep 21;19(35):5806-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i35.5806.
7
Peroral endoscopic myotomy: A short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach.经口内镜肌切开术:与标准腹腔镜方法的短期比较。
Surgery. 2013 Oct;154(4):893-7; discussion 897-900. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.042.
8
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy.经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)与腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术的围手术期结果比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb;17(2):228-35. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2030-3. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
9
How i do it: per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).操作方法:经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jun;16(6):1251-5. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1868-8. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
10
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia.经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)治疗食管失弛缓症。
Endoscopy. 2010 Apr;42(4):265-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244080. Epub 2010 Mar 30.