Suppr超能文献

术后疼痛评分降低以及麻醉药物使用减少表明,经口内镜下肌切开术优于腹腔镜下Heller肌切开术。

Reduced postoperative pain scores and narcotic use favor per-oral endoscopic myotomy over laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

作者信息

Docimo Salvatore, Mathew Abraham, Shope Alexander J, Winder Joshua S, Haluck Randy S, Pauli Eric M

机构信息

Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, H149, Hershey, PA, 17036, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):795-800. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5034-3. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a less invasive therapy for achalasia with a shorter hospitalization but with similar short- and long-term outcomes as a laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). Previous literature comparing POEM to LHM has focused primarily on postoperative outcome parameters such as complications, dysphagia scores and gastro-esophageal reflux severity. This study specifically compares postoperative pain following POEM to pain following LHM, the current gold-standard operation.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing POEM or LHM for achalasia was performed from 2006 to 2015. Data collection included demographics, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS) and pain scores (arrival to the recovery room, 1 h postoperative, average first 24 h and upon discharge). Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test and Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Forty-four POEM patients and 122 LHM patients were identified. The average age (52.2 ± 20.75 vs 50.9 ± 17.89 years, p = 0.306) and BMI (28.1 ± 7.62 vs 27.6 ± 7.07 kg/m, p = 0.824) did not differ between the POEM and LHM groups, respectively; however, the American Society of Anesthesiology scores were higher in the POEM patients (2.43 ± 0.62 vs 2.11 ± 0.71, p = 0.011). There were no differences in rates of smoking, diabetes, cardiac disease or pulmonary disease. The average pain scores upon arrival to the recovery room and 1 h postoperatively were lower in the POEM group (2.3 ± 3.014 vs 3.61 ± 3 0.418, p = 0.025 and 2.2 ± 2.579 vs 3.46 ± 3.063, p = 0.034, respectively). There was no difference in the average pain score over the first 24 h (2.7 ± 2.067 vs 3.29 ± 1.980, p = 0.472) or at the time of discharge (1.6 ± 2.420 vs 2.09 ± 2.157, p = 0.0657) between the POEM and LHM groups. After standardizing opioid administration against 10 mg of oral morphine, the POEM group used significantly less narcotics that the LHM group (35.8 vs 101.8 mg, p < 0.001) while hospitalized. The average LOS for the POEM group was 31.2 h and 55.79 for the LHM group (p < 0.0001). At discharge, fewer POEM patients required a prescription for a narcotic analgesic (6.81 vs 92.4 %, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

POEM demonstrated significantly less postoperative pain upon arrival to the recovery room and 1 h postoperatively. To achieve similar pain scores during the first 24 h and at discharge, LHM patients required more narcotic analgesic administration. Despite a significantly shorter LOS, fewer POEM patients require a prescription for narcotic analgesics compared to LHM. POEM is a less painful procedure for achalasia than LHM, permitting earlier hospital discharge with little need for home narcotic use.

摘要

引言

经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)是一种治疗贲门失弛缓症的侵入性较小的疗法,住院时间较短,但短期和长期疗效与腹腔镜Heller肌切开术(LHM)相似。以往比较POEM与LHM的文献主要关注术后结局参数,如并发症、吞咽困难评分和胃食管反流严重程度。本研究专门比较了POEM术后疼痛与LHM术后疼痛,LHM是目前的金标准手术。

方法

对2006年至2015年期间所有接受POEM或LHM治疗贲门失弛缓症的患者进行回顾性研究。数据收集包括人口统计学、合并症、住院时间(LOS)和疼痛评分(到达恢复室时、术后1小时、术后头24小时平均评分及出院时评分)。采用Student's t检验和卡方检验进行统计分析。

结果

确定了44例接受POEM治疗的患者和122例接受LHM治疗的患者。POEM组和LHM组的平均年龄(分别为52.2±20.75岁和50.9±17.89岁,p = 0.306)和BMI(分别为28.1±7.62 kg/m和27.6±7.07 kg/m,p = 0.824)无差异;然而,POEM组患者的美国麻醉医师协会评分更高(2.43±0.62 vs 2.11±0.71,p = 0.011)。吸烟、糖尿病、心脏病或肺病的发生率无差异。POEM组到达恢复室时和术后1小时的平均疼痛评分较低(分别为2.3±3.014 vs 3.61±3.0418,p = 0.025和2.2±2.579 vs 3.46±3.063,p = 0.034)。POEM组和LHM组术后头24小时的平均疼痛评分(2.7±2.067 vs 3.29±1.980,p = 0.472)或出院时的平均疼痛评分(1.6±2.420 vs 2.09±2.157,p = 0.0657)无差异。在将阿片类药物用量按10 mg口服吗啡进行标准化后,POEM组住院期间使用的麻醉药品明显少于LHM组(35.8 vs 101.8 mg,p < 0.001)。POEM组的平均住院时间为31.2小时,LHM组为55.79小时(p < 0.0001)。出院时,需要开具麻醉性镇痛药处方的POEM患者较少(6.81% vs 92.4%,p < 0.0001)。

结论

POEM在到达恢复室时和术后1小时的术后疼痛明显较轻。为了在术后头24小时和出院时达到相似的疼痛评分,LHM患者需要更多的麻醉性镇痛药。尽管POEM组的住院时间明显较短,但与LHM组相比,需要开具麻醉性镇痛药处方的POEM患者较少。对于贲门失弛缓症,POEM比LHM的疼痛程度更低,允许更早出院,且几乎无需在家中使用麻醉药品。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验