Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;19(3):366-376. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.563. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
Symptom severity assessed by NYHA functional class and QRS duration are essential criteria for selection of heart failure (HF) patients for CRT. This study assessed the relationship between NYHA class, QRS duration, and survival in a nationwide HF registry.
We studied 13 423 patients with HF in NYHA class II-IV and LVEF <40% in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Survival was followed via the Swedish Population Registry. Of 12 534 patients without CRT (age 71 ± 12 years, 29% women), 51% and 49% were in NYHA class II and III-IV, respectively. Patients in NYHA class II compared with class III-IV were younger (69 vs. 73 years), and had a better systolic function (49% vs. 58% with LVEF <30%), P <0.001 for all, and a favourable co-morbidity profile. QRS duration was 116 ± 29 ms in NYHA class II and 119 ± 29 ms in NYHA class III-IV with QRS ≥120 ms found in 37% vs. 44%, and an LBBB in 23% vs. 28% (P < 0.001 for all). Upon multivariable Cox regression adjusting for 40 clinically relevant variables, mortality risk was higher in NYHA class III-IV vs. class II, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-1.40. Mortality was also higher with QRS prolongation ≥120 ms vs. narrow QRS. The HR in NYHA class II patients with non-LBBB was 1.19 (95% CI 1.05 - 1.36) and in those with LBBB it was 1.16 (95% CI 1.03-1.41). The corresponding HRs in NYHA class III-IV were 1.33 (95% CI 1.21-1.47) and 1.12 (95% CI 1.02-1.22). There was no significant interaction between the effects of NYHA class and QRS duration or morphology on mortality. Applying different scenarios to estimate guideline adherence, fewer patients with NYHA class II (range 14.4-42.6%) compared with NYHA class III-IV (18.0-45.4%) had received a CRT device when indicated.
In HF with reduced LVEF, QRS prolongation is common and independently linked to worse survival. The increase in mortality risk associated with QRS prolongation of both LBBB and non-LBBB morphology is similar in NYHA class II and III-IV.
纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级和 QRS 持续时间评估的症状严重程度是心力衰竭(HF)患者 CRT 选择的重要标准。本研究评估了全国性 HF 注册研究中 NYHA 分级、QRS 持续时间与生存率之间的关系。
我们研究了瑞典心力衰竭注册研究中 13423 例 NYHA 分级 II-IV 级和 LVEF<40%的 HF 患者。通过瑞典人口登记处对患者进行生存随访。在未接受 CRT(年龄 71±12 岁,29%为女性)的 12534 例患者中,分别有 51%和 49%为 NYHA 分级 II 级和 III-IV 级。与 NYHA 分级 III-IV 级患者相比,NYHA 分级 II 级患者更年轻(69 岁 vs. 73 岁),收缩功能更好(LVEF<30%的患者分别为 49%和 58%,均 P<0.001),合并症谱更有利。NYHA 分级 II 级患者的 QRS 持续时间为 116±29ms,NYHA 分级 III-IV 级患者为 119±29ms,QRS≥120ms 的患者分别为 37%和 44%,左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)分别为 23%和 28%(均 P<0.001)。多变量 Cox 回归校正 40 个临床相关变量后,NYHA 分级 III-IV 级患者的死亡风险高于 NYHA 分级 II 级,风险比(HR)为 1.31,95%置信区间(CI)为 1.23-1.40。QRS 延长≥120ms 与 QRS 狭窄患者的死亡率也较高。NYHA 分级 II 级患者中,非 LBBB 患者的 HR 为 1.19(95%CI 1.05-1.36),LBBB 患者为 1.16(95%CI 1.03-1.41)。NYHA 分级 III-IV 级患者的 HR 分别为 1.33(95%CI 1.21-1.47)和 1.12(95%CI 1.02-1.22)。NYHA 分级和 QRS 持续时间或形态对死亡率的影响之间无显著交互作用。根据不同的方案估计指南的依从性,与 NYHA 分级 III-IV 级患者(18.0%-45.4%)相比,NYHA 分级 II 级患者(14.4%-42.6%)接受 CRT 装置的患者更少。
在 LVEF 降低的 HF 中,QRS 延长很常见,与生存率下降独立相关。LBBB 和非 LBBB 形态 QRS 延长与死亡率风险增加相关,在 NYHA 分级 II 级和 III-IV 级患者中相似。