• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科工作期间打断同事的原因——一项定性研究。

Reasons for interrupting colleagues during emergency department work - A qualitative study.

作者信息

Berg Lena M, Florin Jan, Ehrenberg Anna, Östergren Jan, Djärv Therese, Göransson Katarina E

机构信息

Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Emergency Medicine Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.

School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.

出版信息

Int Emerg Nurs. 2016 Nov;29:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2016.06.001
PMID:27339485
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Emergency department team members frequently need to interact with each other, a circumstance causing multiple interruptions. However, information is lacking about the motives underlying these interruptions and this study aimed to explore clinicians' reasons to interrupt colleagues during emergency department work.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews with 10 physicians and 10 registered nurses at two Swedish emergency departments. The interviews were analyzed inductively using content analysis.

RESULTS

The working conditions to some extent sustained the clinicians' need to interrupt, for example different routines. Another reason to interrupt was to improve the initiator's work process, such as when the initiators perceived that the interruption had high clinical relevance. The third reason concerns the desire to influence the work process of colleagues in order to prevent mistakes and provide information for the person being interrupted to improve patient care.

CONCLUSION

The three identified categories for why emergency department clinicians interrupt their colleagues were related to working conditions and a wish to improve/influence the work processes for both initiators and recipients. Several of the reasons given for interrupting colleagues were done in order to improve patient care. Interruptions perceived as negative to the recipient were mostly related to the working conditions.

摘要

目的

急诊科团队成员经常需要相互交流,这种情况会导致多次打断。然而,关于这些打断背后的动机的信息却很缺乏,本研究旨在探讨临床医生在急诊科工作期间打断同事的原因。

方法

对瑞典两家急诊科的10名医生和10名注册护士进行半结构化访谈。采用内容分析法对访谈进行归纳分析。

结果

工作条件在一定程度上满足了临床医生打断他人的需求,例如不同的工作流程。打断的另一个原因是为了改进发起者的工作流程,比如当发起者认为打断具有高度临床相关性时。第三个原因是希望影响同事的工作流程,以防止出错,并为被打断者提供信息以改善患者护理。

结论

确定的急诊科临床医生打断同事的三类原因与工作条件以及改善/影响发起者和接受者工作流程的愿望有关。给出的几个打断同事的原因是为了改善患者护理。被认为对接受者有负面影响的打断大多与工作条件有关。

相似文献

1
Reasons for interrupting colleagues during emergency department work - A qualitative study.急诊科工作期间打断同事的原因——一项定性研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2016 Nov;29:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
2
Factors influencing clinicians' perceptions of interruptions as disturbing or non-disturbing: A qualitative study.影响临床医生将干扰视为令人不安或不令人不安的因素:一项定性研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2016 Jul;27:11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
3
Interruptions in emergency department work: an observational and interview study.急诊科工作中断:一项观察和访谈研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Aug;22(8):656-63. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001967. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
4
Physicians' and nurses' perceptions of patient safety risks in the emergency department.医生和护士对急诊科患者安全风险的认知。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2017 Jul;33:14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
5
National targets, process transformation and local consequences in an NHS emergency department (ED): a qualitative study.国家目标、流程转型与英国国家医疗服务体系急诊部的地方后果:一项定性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2014 Jun 13;14:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-14-12.
6
Perceptions of urgency: defining the gap between what physicians and nurses perceive to be an urgent issue.对紧迫性的认知:定义医生和护士所认为的紧急问题之间的差距。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):378-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.11.010. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
7
Patients' perceptions of quality of care at an emergency department and identification of areas for quality improvement.患者对急诊科护理质量的认知以及质量改进领域的确定。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Aug;15(8):1045-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01368.x.
8
Complexities of emergency communication: clinicians' perceptions of communication challenges in a trilingual emergency department.急诊沟通的复杂性:临床医生对三语急诊科沟通挑战的认知
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Nov;26(21-22):3396-3407. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13699. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
9
Emergency Physician Use of Cognitive Strategies to Manage Interruptions.急诊医生运用认知策略应对干扰。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;70(5):683-687. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.036.
10
Nurses' perceptions of multitasking in the emergency department: effective, fun and unproblematic (at least for me) – a qualitative study.护士对急诊科多任务处理的认知:有效、有趣且毫无问题(至少对我来说)——一项定性研究
Int Emerg Nurs. 2015 Apr;23(2):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The scope of emergency nursing viewed through the lens of complex adaptive systems: A discussion paper.从复杂适应系统视角审视的急诊护理范畴:一篇讨论文章。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Nov 26;8:100270. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100270. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Mapping registered nurse anaesthetists' intraoperative work: tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes, and interactions: a prospective observational study.注册护士麻醉师术中工作的映射:任务、多任务处理、中断及其原因以及交互作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 19;12(1):e052283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052283.
3
Reaching people soon after a traumatic event: an exploratory observational feasibility study of recruitment in the emergency department to deliver a brief behavioral intervention via smartphone to prevent intrusive memories of trauma.
在创伤事件发生后尽快接触人群:一项关于在急诊科招募人员以通过智能手机提供简短行为干预来预防创伤性侵入性记忆的探索性观察性可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Oct 7;7(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00916-x.