Nash Robert, Majithia Anooj, Singh Arvind
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Northwick Park Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
J Int Adv Otol. 2016 Apr;12(1):98-100. doi: 10.5152/iao.2016.1581.
There are a number of published criteria for the investigation of asymmetrical audiovestibular symptoms. Our aim was to determine the agreement between these protocols when determining whether to investigate a group of patients treated at our institution.
Retrospective audit of the indications for arranging 854 consecutive magnetic resonance imaging scans of the internal auditory meatus. These indications were compared to the Oxford, Northern, Charing Cross, and Nashville guidelines on the investigation of asymmetrical audiovestibular symptoms.
The level of agreement was low, with kappa values ranging between 0.15 and 0.58 between the four selected protocols.
While these criteria seem very similar in nature, due to the number of patients with mild asymmetry and subtle distinctions such as the inclusion or exclusion of tinnitus, there are low levels of agreement between protocols. This study highlights another area of difficulty when determining which patients to investigate.
有许多已发表的用于调查不对称性听觉前庭症状的标准。我们的目的是确定在判定是否对我院治疗的一组患者进行调查时,这些方案之间的一致性。
对连续854例内耳道磁共振成像扫描的安排指征进行回顾性审核。将这些指征与牛津、北部、查令十字和纳什维尔关于不对称性听觉前庭症状调查的指南进行比较。
一致性水平较低,所选的四个方案之间的kappa值在0.15至0.58之间。
虽然这些标准在本质上似乎非常相似,但由于轻度不对称患者的数量以及诸如耳鸣的纳入或排除等细微差别,各方案之间的一致性水平较低。这项研究突出了在确定调查哪些患者时的另一个困难领域。