Lebar Tina, Jerala Roman
Department of Synthetic Biology and Immunology, National Institute of Chemistry , 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
EN-FIST Centre of Excellence , 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
ACS Synth Biol. 2016 Oct 21;5(10):1050-1058. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00259. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
Transcriptional activator-like effector (TALE)- and CRISPR/Cas9-based designable recognition domains represent a technological breakthrough not only for genome editing but also for building designed genetic circuits. Both platforms are able to target rarely occurring DNA segments, even within complex genomes. TALE and dCas9 domains, genetically fused to transcriptional regulatory domains, can be used for the construction of engineered logic circuits. Here we benchmarked the performance of the two platforms, targeting the same DNA sequences, to compare their advantages for the construction of designed circuits in mammalian cells. Optimal targeting strands for repression and activation of dCas9-based designed transcription factors were identified; both platforms exhibited good orthogonality and were used to construct functionally complete NOR gates. Although the CRISPR/dCas9 system is clearly easier to construct, TALE-based activators were significantly stronger, and the TALE-based platform performed better, especially for the construction of layered circuits.
基于转录激活样效应因子(TALE)和CRISPR/Cas9的可设计识别结构域不仅是基因组编辑技术的一项突破,也是构建设计遗传电路的一项突破。这两个平台都能够靶向罕见的DNA片段,即使是在复杂的基因组中。与转录调控结构域基因融合的TALE和dCas9结构域可用于构建工程逻辑电路。在这里,我们对靶向相同DNA序列的这两个平台的性能进行了基准测试,以比较它们在构建哺乳动物细胞中设计电路方面的优势。确定了用于抑制和激活基于dCas9的设计转录因子的最佳靶向链;这两个平台都表现出良好的正交性,并被用于构建功能完整的或非门。虽然CRISPR/dCas9系统显然更容易构建,但基于TALE的激活剂要强得多,基于TALE的平台表现更好,特别是在构建分层电路方面。