Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房静脉用药配制的可变性

Variability of intravenous medication preparation in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units.

作者信息

Levkovich Bianca J, Bui Thuy, Bovell Alastair, Watterson Jason, Egan Annette, Poole Susan G, Dooley Michael J

机构信息

Lead Clinical Pharmacist Intensive Care Pharmacy Department, Alfred Health; Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Perioperative Medicine, Pharmacy Department, Alfred Health; Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Dec;22(6):965-970. doi: 10.1111/jep.12574. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIM AND OBJECTIVE: In Australia and New Zealand, there are no established standards for the final presentations of prepared intravenous medications in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). Variability has the potential to contribute to deficiencies in safety, efficiency and cost effectiveness. This study aimed to examine the variability in the preparation of intravenous medications in ICUs.

METHODS

An electronic survey was distributed to critical care pharmacists in Australia and New Zealand via an established email group. The preparation of vasopressors, inotropes, sedation, analgesia, heparin, insulin and neuromuscular blockers were examined. Respondents were asked about initial presentation, final concentration prepared, who prepared and current safety practices used. Questions also addressed opinions and attitudes to safety practices and responsibility for leading change.

RESULTS

Forty responses to the survey were received, representing 17% of ICUs in Australia and New Zealand. Significant variation in final concentration was observed for all infusions except insulin and esmolol. The final volumes varied significantly for all drugs. The majority of infusions were prepared by nursing staff with only a small number of pre-prepared presentations currently in use. Labelling was usually hand-written with some colour-coding. Most respondents identified safety and efficiency but not cost effectiveness as likely to be improved by the use of pre-prepared infusions. Most respondents felt 'government' or peak clinical bodies should lead practice standardization.

CONCLUSION

Significant variation exists in the preparation of intravenous medications across ICUs in Australia and New Zealand. Nationally or regionally coordinated rationalization and standardization could improve safety and efficiency and potentially reduce the barrier of cost.

摘要

原理、目的与目标:在澳大利亚和新西兰,重症监护病房(ICU)中静脉内用药的最终调配尚无既定标准。这种变异性有可能导致安全性、效率和成本效益方面的缺陷。本研究旨在调查ICU中静脉内用药调配的变异性。

方法

通过一个既定的电子邮件群组向澳大利亚和新西兰的重症监护药剂师发放了一份电子调查问卷。对血管加压药、强心药、镇静药、镇痛药、肝素、胰岛素和神经肌肉阻滞剂的调配情况进行了调查。受访者被问及初始调配形式、最终调配浓度、调配人员以及当前使用的安全措施。问题还涉及对安全措施的意见和态度以及引领变革的责任。

结果

共收到40份调查问卷回复,占澳大利亚和新西兰ICU总数的17%。除胰岛素和艾司洛尔外,所有输注药物的最终浓度均存在显著差异。所有药物的最终体积差异显著。大多数输注药物由护理人员调配,目前仅有少量预先调配好的制剂在使用。标签通常为手写,有一些颜色编码。大多数受访者认为使用预先调配好的输注药物可能会提高安全性和效率,但不会提高成本效益。大多数受访者认为“政府”或主要临床机构应引领实践标准化。

结论

澳大利亚和新西兰的ICU在静脉内用药的调配方面存在显著差异。全国性或地区性协调的合理化和标准化可提高安全性和效率,并有可能降低成本障碍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验