Kiss Nicole, Isenring Elisabeth, Gough Karla, Wheeler Greg, Wirth Andrew, Campbell Belinda A, Krishnasamy Meinir
a Department of Cancer Experiences Research , Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre , East Melbourne , Victoria , Australia.
b Faculty of Medicine , Dentistry and Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Victoria , Australia.
Nutr Cancer. 2016 Aug-Sep;68(6):958-67. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2016.1188972. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
Malnutrition is prevalent in patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy (RT) for lung cancer. This pilot study tested the feasibility and acceptability of delivering an intensive nutrition intervention for lung cancer patients receiving RT. Twenty-four patients with lung cancer were randomized to receive the intervention which employed a care pathway to guide intensive dietary counseling from pretreatment until 6-wk posttreatment or usual care. Nutritional, fatigue, and functional outcomes were assessed using valid and reliable questionnaires before randomization, at the start and end of RT and 1- and 3-mo post-RT. Consent rate was 57% with an overall attrition of 37%. Subject compliance with the completion of study questionnaires was 100%. A clinically important mean difference indicated greater overall satisfaction with nutritional care in the intervention group (5.00, interquartile range [IQR] 4.50-5.00; 4.00, IQR 4.00-4.00). Clinically important differences favoring the intervention were observed for weight (3.0 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.8, 6.8), fat-free mass (0.6 kg; 95% CI -2.1, 3.3), physical well-being (2.1; 95% CI -2.3, 6.5), and functional well-being (5.1; 95% CI 1.6, 8.6), but all 95% CIs were wide and most included zero. Recruitment feasibility and acceptability of the intervention were demonstrated, which suggest larger trials using an intensive nutrition intervention would be achievable.
营养不良在接受肺癌(化疗)放疗(RT)的患者中很普遍。这项初步研究测试了为接受放疗的肺癌患者提供强化营养干预的可行性和可接受性。24例肺癌患者被随机分组,接受采用护理路径的干预措施,该护理路径从治疗前到治疗后6周指导强化饮食咨询,或接受常规护理。在随机分组前、放疗开始和结束时以及放疗后1个月和3个月,使用有效且可靠的问卷评估营养、疲劳和功能结局。同意率为57%,总体损耗率为37%。受试者完成研究问卷的依从性为100%。临床重要的平均差异表明,干预组对营养护理的总体满意度更高(5.00,四分位间距[IQR]4.50 - 5.00;4.00,IQR 4.00 - 4.00)。在体重(3.0 kg;95%置信区间[CI] -0.8,6.8)、去脂体重(0.6 kg;95% CI -2.1,3.3)、身体幸福感(2.1;95% CI -2.3,6.5)和功能幸福感(5.1;95% CI 1.6,8.6)方面观察到有利于干预的临床重要差异,但所有95% CI都很宽,且大多数包含零。证明了干预措施的招募可行性和可接受性,这表明使用强化营养干预进行更大规模的试验是可行的。