Schaafs Lars-Arne, Lenk Julian, Hamm Bernd, Niehues Stefan Markus
Department of Radiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(7):20160127. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160127. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
To evaluate the feasibility and image quality of low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses using iterative reconstruction with adaptive-iterative dose reduction in three dimensions (AIDR 3D) in comparison with conventional image protocols of older scanner generations.
Sinus CT scans of 136 patients were assessed retrospectively. Patients underwent CT either with low-dose settings (Protocol A: 80 kV, 30 mA s; Protocol B: 120 kV, 15 mA s or C: 80 kV, 90 mA s) reconstructed using AIDR 3D (Protocols A and B) or filtered back projection (FBP) (Protocol C) or with standard dose (Protocol D: 120 kV, 80 mA s) and FBP. Image quality was assessed in consensus by two blinded readers scoring the diagnostic image quality (from 1 = excellent to 5 = non-diagnostic) and conspicuity of important anatomic landmarks (from 0 = not visible to 2 = completely visible; maximum score of 16 points) as well as osseous structures (maximum score of 12 points). Dose-length product, effective dose (ED), CT dose index and scan length were retrieved for each scan and compared.
Mean ED could be lowered by 82% when using Protocol A. The best image quality was found using Protocol B (mean score = 2.1 ± 0.51). Conspicuity of relevant anatomic landmarks was best with Protocol A (mean score = 11.97 ± 1.88). Protocol B provided the highest conspicuity of osseous structures (mean score = 8.27 ± 1.58). Image noise was highest in images obtained using Protocol A.
AIDR 3D allows a significant dose reduction while maintaining a good diagnostic image quality and conspicuity of relevant anatomic structures.
与旧一代扫描仪的传统成像协议相比,评估采用三维自适应迭代剂量降低技术(AIDR 3D)的迭代重建技术进行鼻窦低剂量CT扫描的可行性和图像质量。
对136例患者的鼻窦CT扫描进行回顾性评估。患者分别接受低剂量扫描(方案A:80 kV,30 mAs;方案B:120 kV,15 mAs或C:80 kV,90 mAs),采用AIDR 3D重建(方案A和B)或滤波反投影(FBP)(方案C),或接受标准剂量扫描(方案D:120 kV,80 mAs)并采用FBP。由两名不知情的阅片者共同评估图像质量,对诊断图像质量(从1=优秀到5=非诊断性)、重要解剖标志的清晰度(从0=不可见到2=完全可见;最高分为16分)以及骨质结构(最高分为12分)进行评分。记录每次扫描的剂量长度乘积、有效剂量(ED)、CT剂量指数和扫描长度并进行比较。
使用方案A时,平均有效剂量可降低82%。使用方案B时图像质量最佳(平均评分=2.1±0.51)。方案A对相关解剖标志的清晰度最佳(平均评分=11.97±1.88)。方案B对骨质结构的清晰度最高(平均评分=8.27±1.58)。使用方案A获得的图像噪声最高。
AIDR 3D在显著降低剂量的同时,能够保持良好的诊断图像质量和相关解剖结构的清晰度。